Another Low PPD Thread

It seems that a lot of GPU problems revolve around specific versions of drivers. Though AMD has their own support structure, you can often learn from information reported by others who fold.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
nrobidoux
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:22 pm

Another Low PPD Thread

Post by nrobidoux »

Code: Select all

*********************** Log Started 2014-11-27T20:30:49Z ***********************
20:30:49:************************* Folding@home Client *************************
20:30:49:    Website: http://folding.stanford.edu/
20:30:49:  Copyright: (c) 2009-2014 Stanford University
20:30:49:     Author: Joseph Coffland <joseph@cauldrondevelopment.com>
20:30:49:       Args: --child --lifeline 2800 /etc/fahclient/config.xml --run-as
20:30:49:             fahclient --pid-file=/var/run/fahclient.pid --daemon
20:30:49:     Config: /etc/fahclient/config.xml
20:30:49:******************************** Build ********************************
20:30:49:    Version: 7.4.4
20:30:49:       Date: Mar 4 2014
20:30:49:       Time: 12:02:38
20:30:49:    SVN Rev: 4130
20:30:49:     Branch: fah/trunk/client
20:30:49:   Compiler: GNU 4.4.7
20:30:49:    Options: -std=gnu++98 -O3 -funroll-loops -mfpmath=sse -ffast-math
20:30:49:             -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations -msse2
20:30:49:   Platform: linux2 3.2.0-1-amd64
20:30:49:       Bits: 64
20:30:49:       Mode: Release
20:30:49:******************************* System ********************************
20:30:49:        CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 v2 @ 1.80GHz
20:30:49:     CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4
20:30:49:       CPUs: 8
20:30:49:     Memory: 31.37GiB
20:30:49:Free Memory: 30.29GiB
20:30:49:    Threads: POSIX_THREADS
20:30:49: OS Version: 3.2
20:30:49:Has Battery: false
20:30:49: On Battery: false
20:30:49: UTC Offset: -5
20:30:49:        PID: 2802
20:30:49:        CWD: /var/lib/fahclient
20:30:49:         OS: Linux 3.2.0-52-generic x86_64
20:30:49:    OS Arch: AMD64
20:30:49:       GPUs: 1
20:30:49:      GPU 0: ATI:5 Tahiti PRO [Radeon HD 7950]
20:30:49:       CUDA: Not detected
20:30:49:***********************************************************************
20:30:49:<config>
20:30:49:  <!-- Client Control -->
20:30:49:  <fold-anon v='true'/>
20:30:49:
20:30:49:  <!-- Folding Slot Configuration -->
20:30:49:  <gpu v='false'/>
20:30:49:
20:30:49:  <!-- Network -->
20:30:49:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
20:30:49:
20:30:49:  <!-- User Information -->
20:30:49:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
20:30:49:  <user v='Nolan_Robidoux'/>
20:30:49:
20:30:49:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
20:30:49:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'/>
20:30:49:  <slot id='1' type='GPU'>
20:30:49:    <opencl-index v='0'/>
20:30:49:  </slot>
20:30:49:</config>
20:30:49:Switching to user fahclient
20:30:49:Trying to access database...
20:30:49:Successfully acquired database lock
20:30:49:Enabled folding slot 00: READY cpu:6
20:30:49:Enabled folding slot 01: READY gpu:0:Tahiti PRO [Radeon HD 7950]
20:30:49:WU02:FS01:Starting
20:30:49:WU02:FS01:Running FahCore: /usr/bin/FAHCoreWrapper /var/lib/fahclient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Linux/AMD64/ATI/R600/Core_17.fah/FahCore_17 -dir 02 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 2802 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 0 -gpu-vendor ati
20:30:49:WU02:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 2811
20:30:49:WU02:FS01:Core PID:2815
20:30:49:WU02:FS01:FahCore 0x17 started
20:30:49:WU01:FS00:Starting
20:30:49:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: /usr/bin/FAHCoreWrapper /var/lib/fahclient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Linux/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4 -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 2802 -checkpoint 15 -np 6
20:30:49:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 2818
20:30:49:WU01:FS00:Core PID:2822
20:30:49:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
20:30:50:WU02:FS01:0x17:*********************** Log Started 2014-11-27T20:30:49Z ***********************
20:30:50:WU02:FS01:0x17:Project: 13000 (Run 784, Clone 0, Gen 101)
20:30:50:WU02:FS01:0x17:Unit: 0x000000b2538b3db7531078e36a7032f9
20:30:50:WU02:FS01:0x17:CPU: 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
20:30:50:WU02:FS01:0x17:Machine: 1
20:30:50:WU02:FS01:0x17:Digital signatures verified
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 932292 -> 1546812 (decompressed 165.9 percent)
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=932292 data_size=1546812, decompressed_data_size=1546812 diff=0
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9013 (Run 689, Clone 1, Gen 73)
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
20:30:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
20:30:56:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Using Gromacs checkpoints
20:30:56:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Resuming from checkpoint
20:30:56:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.log
20:30:56:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.trr
20:30:56:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.xtc
20:30:56:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.edr
20:30:56:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 33675 out of 250000 steps  (13%)
20:31:59:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 35000 out of 250000 steps  (14%)
20:34:04:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 37500 out of 250000 steps  (15%)
20:34:10:WU02:FS01:0x17:Completed 0 out of 5000000 steps (0%)
20:38:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 40000 out of 250000 steps  (16%)
20:42:06:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 42500 out of 250000 steps  (17%)
20:46:11:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 45000 out of 250000 steps  (18%)
I have two computers. I do understand the reason for low folding on one may not be the other. I'm converting my mining rig to a folding rid. To do so I needed a new notherboard. With that came new CPUs, a case, RAM, etc. For those that don't know about mining, it's kinda barebones... except the GPUs.

My system is now:
  • OS: Xubuntu 12.04
  • Storage:
    • Marvell RAID 0 (4x Muskin 120GB Chronos SSDs)
    • WD Blue 250GB 5400 rpm SATA II (swap/scratch)
  • CPU: 2 x Xeon E5-2603v2
  • RAM: 8 x G. Skill DDR3-1066 4GB
  • Motherboard: ASUS Z9PE WS
  • PSU: 2 x Lepa G1200W
  • Driver: Catalyst 14.9
  • GFX: HSI 7950 IceQ Boost
I have 4 more 7950s (same model) and 2 7970s IceQ Boosts. But I wanted to get this up and running before I added them in.

Problems: Low PPD. I have a Kill-A-Watt (well two... one per PSU, but only have one active now). I reads 118W on idle. It reads 139W on medium.

Code: Select all

aticonfig --odgc
indicates 0% GPU usage. It's ticking along very slowly. Deadline ~3 days... expected finish ~10. No problem with CPU. Says CPU:6 I'm assuming that's 7 cores. My CPUs do not have hyperthreading. I have 8 cores total. I've used -1 in the GPU settings.... no change.

I've used these mining, same OS no problem. Furmark and other GPU benchmarks on Linux... no problem. What can I do?

On my laptop I have an AMD A10 APU and a R290X. CPU does fine. R290X does fine. Integrated GPU... 8850 I think... same thing as my 7950. :? Finish far past deadline. This one is Win8 though.
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by 7im »

nrobidoux wrote:.snip.

I reads 118W on idle. It reads 139W on medium.

On my laptop I have an AMD A10 APU and a R290X. CPU does fine. R290X does fine. Integrated GPU... 8850 I think... same thing as my 7950. :? Finish far past deadline. This one is Win8 though.
Welcome to the forum, nrobidoux.

It reads how many watts on full? If you want to get the best PPD, the Power slider needs to be at full. That is the first step.

IIRC, folding performance went up after Cat 14.13. Upgrade the driver to latest for your OS.

But in the end, you might still have better luck with Windows for GPU folding. Try the above first.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
ChristianVirtual
Posts: 1576
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 12:14 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by ChristianVirtual »

Hard to tell based on the log you provided. You need to wait a number to frames to give the PPD prediction enough data points. Based on you log there is just the first frame in process on core 17. And at that point in time the CPU is more busy in preparation and transfer data to the GPU.

On my GTX 780 one frame from project 13000 take more the. 7 min; waiting for let say 5 frames gives you at least half an hour to get a stable prediction.

Assuming that there is some time between your first post and now: how is the PPD right now ?

Of course there could be a driver issue, but others would need to jump in as I dont know AMD setups (I'm from the "green" side)

Another thing: did you recently started the the passkey/donor name combination ? Because you need 10 finished/transferred/accepted WU before the quick return bonus generate higher PPD; if you are below that initial 10 WU limit (or below continued 80% rate) Points will be only the lower base points.
ImageImage
Please contribute your logs to http://ppd.fahmm.net
ChristianVirtual
Posts: 1576
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 12:14 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by ChristianVirtual »

When did you started folding ? When I look on your donor ID I see 1000 finished WU with 900000 points. A bit unusual for today's setups
Reason 1: started many years ago with much lower points
Reason 2: started with NaCL client
Reason 3: something wrong with your passkey (typo ?)
ImageImage
Please contribute your logs to http://ppd.fahmm.net
nrobidoux
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:22 pm

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by nrobidoux »

General reply to each is, I know my subject line says PPD. But PPD is related to speed of work being completed. I got no speed because my GPU is not working hard. My Kill-A-Watt should be over 350W. From my understanding reading a few posts and your replies... if I just started and was cruising along with 350+W on my meter I would be getting low PPD anyway. I believe I'm getting it because my GPU isn't doing anything. :(
7im wrote: It reads how many watts on full? If you want to get the best PPD, the Power slider needs to be at full. That is the first step.

IIRC, folding performance went up after Cat 14.13. Upgrade the driver to latest for your OS....
Funny you say this. I've read some posts that say go to previous drivers... I just tried Catalyst 12.4. Slider to full... Gives me cpu:7 instead of cpu:6. (Both 14.9 and 12.4) I don't have my laptop with me to compare (~2000 miles from here folding away) but my gpu line in FAHControl says gpu:0: Tahiti Pro [Radeon HD 7950] I believed on medium and full GPU is at 100% usage. Light, GPU is disabled. Medium/Full doesn't change GPU speed for me. I haven't timed it but saying >5 minutes per 0.01% ... I would be comfortable with that statement.
ChristianVirtual wrote:Assuming that there is some time between your first post and now: how is the PPD right now ?

Another thing: did you recently started the the passkey/donor name combination ? Because you need 10 finished/transferred/accepted WU...
Not enough for the ETA to change. Keep changing things and it keeps restarting from 0.00%
ChristianVirtual wrote:When did you started folding ? When I look on your donor ID I see 1000 finished WU with 900000 points. A bit unusual for today's setups
Reason 1: started many years ago with much lower points
Reason 2: started with NaCL client
Reason 3: something wrong with your passkey (typo ?)
I started many years ago and got to 3xxK. I really can't remember the exact number but it was below 400k. Then several year break. I can't remember when I started again.... I think 2 months ago? That was with my R290X laptop. The APU has always been too slow. The R290X and CPU have been good.

I literally just got my server / workstation up and running and am trying to get that going. I've done a few with the NaCL client. But most have been with the desktop client.

My passkey I got... September 20th. I copy paste it. My laptop has basically been running 24/7 when it can. 95++% of my points from 3xxK -> 900K is my laptop. I probably have finished the 10 WUs required. :)

Someone mentioned going "green"... it'd be a tough move. Lots of time, effort and cost getting my mining rig up. More to convert this to folding... Purchase 7 NV GPUs... hard on the wallet.
nrobidoux
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:22 pm

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by nrobidoux »

Did some timing while I started "Once Upon a Time"...

CPU Slot - Project 9013 (323,1,30) 00:01:28 / 0.29%
GPU Slot - Project 13000 (784,0,101) 00:01:28 / 0.01% ... I was a little off. :)

Waited two cycles just to make sure I counted for the 0.01% correctly from 1.64% - 1.66%
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by 7im »

The posts about older AMD drivers working better were likely for folding older work units, and not for Linux.

CV wasn't suggesting you change to the green team, just that he was green and didn't have personal experience on the red team. Please post more of your log when you get a chance.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
nrobidoux
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:22 pm

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by nrobidoux »

Code: Select all

*********************** Log Started 2014-11-28T00:46:02Z ***********************
00:46:02:************************* Folding@home Client *************************
00:46:02:    Website: http://folding.stanford.edu/
00:46:02:  Copyright: (c) 2009-2014 Stanford University
00:46:02:     Author: Joseph Coffland <joseph@cauldrondevelopment.com>
00:46:02:       Args: --child --lifeline 1238 /etc/fahclient/config.xml --run-as
00:46:02:             fahclient --pid-file=/var/run/fahclient.pid --daemon
00:46:02:     Config: /etc/fahclient/config.xml
00:46:02:******************************** Build ********************************
00:46:02:    Version: 7.4.4
00:46:02:       Date: Mar 4 2014
00:46:02:       Time: 12:02:38
00:46:02:    SVN Rev: 4130
00:46:02:     Branch: fah/trunk/client
00:46:02:   Compiler: GNU 4.4.7
00:46:02:    Options: -std=gnu++98 -O3 -funroll-loops -mfpmath=sse -ffast-math
00:46:02:             -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations -msse2
00:46:02:   Platform: linux2 3.2.0-1-amd64
00:46:02:       Bits: 64
00:46:02:       Mode: Release
00:46:02:******************************* System ********************************
00:46:02:        CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 v2 @ 1.80GHz
00:46:02:     CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4
00:46:02:       CPUs: 8
00:46:02:     Memory: 31.37GiB
00:46:02:Free Memory: 30.66GiB
00:46:02:    Threads: POSIX_THREADS
00:46:02: OS Version: 3.2
00:46:02:Has Battery: false
00:46:02: On Battery: false
00:46:02: UTC Offset: -5
00:46:02:        PID: 1241
00:46:02:        CWD: /var/lib/fahclient
00:46:02:         OS: Linux 3.2.0-52-generic x86_64
00:46:02:    OS Arch: AMD64
00:46:02:       GPUs: 1
00:46:02:      GPU 0: ATI:5 Tahiti PRO [Radeon HD 7950]
00:46:02:       CUDA: Not detected
00:46:02:***********************************************************************
00:46:02:<config>
00:46:02:  <!-- Network -->
00:46:02:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
00:46:02:
00:46:02:  <!-- User Information -->
00:46:02:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
00:46:02:  <user v='Nolan_Robidoux'/>
00:46:02:
00:46:02:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
00:46:02:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'/>
00:46:02:  <slot id='1' type='GPU'>
00:46:02:    <opencl-index v='0'/>
00:46:02:  </slot>
00:46:02:</config>
00:46:02:Switching to user fahclient
00:46:02:Connecting to assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80
00:46:02:WARNING:Attempting to update GPUs.txt from assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80: Could not get IP address for assign-GPU.stanford.edu: No address associated with hostname
00:46:02:Connecting to assign-GPU2.stanford.edu:80
00:46:02:WARNING:Attempting to update GPUs.txt from assign-GPU2.stanford.edu:80: Could not get IP address for assign-GPU2.stanford.edu: No address associated with hostname
00:46:02:Trying to access database...
00:46:02:Successfully acquired database lock
00:46:02:Enabled folding slot 00: READY cpu:6
00:46:02:Enabled folding slot 01: READY gpu:0:Tahiti PRO [Radeon HD 7950]
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:Starting
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:Running FahCore: /usr/bin/FAHCoreWrapper /var/lib/fahclient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Linux/AMD64/ATI/R600/Core_17.fah/FahCore_17 -dir 02 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 1241 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 0 -gpu-vendor ati
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 1256
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:Core PID:1279
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:FahCore 0x17 started
00:46:02:WU01:FS00:Starting
00:46:02:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: /usr/bin/FAHCoreWrapper /var/lib/fahclient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Linux/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4 -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 1241 -checkpoint 15 -np 6
00:46:02:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 1289
00:46:02:WU01:FS00:Core PID:1294
00:46:02:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:0x17:*********************** Log Started 2014-11-28T00:46:02Z ***********************
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:0x17:Project: 13000 (Run 784, Clone 0, Gen 101)
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:0x17:Unit: 0x000000b2538b3db7531078e36a7032f9
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:0x17:CPU: 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:0x17:Machine: 1
00:46:02:WU02:FS01:0x17:Digital signatures verified
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 932292 -> 1546812 (decompressed 165.9 percent)
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=932292 data_size=1546812, decompressed_data_size=1546812 diff=0
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9013 (Run 689, Clone 1, Gen 73)
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
00:46:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
00:46:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Using Gromacs checkpoints
00:46:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Resuming from checkpoint
00:46:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.log
00:46:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.trr
00:46:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.xtc
00:46:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.edr
00:46:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 181220 out of 250000 steps  (72%)
00:47:10:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 182500 out of 250000 steps  (73%)
00:49:11:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 185000 out of 250000 steps  (74%)
00:49:27:WU02:FS01:0x17:Completed 0 out of 5000000 steps (0%)
00:51:02:Connecting to assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80
00:51:12:Updated GPUs.txt
00:53:16:FS00:Shutting core down
00:53:18:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Client no longer detected. Shutting down core.
00:53:18:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
00:53:18:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: CLIENT_DIED
00:53:18:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: INTERRUPTED (102 = 0x66)
00:53:18:WU01:FS00:Starting
00:53:18:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Changed SMP threads from 6 to 7 this can cause some work units to fail
00:53:18:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: /usr/bin/FAHCoreWrapper /var/lib/fahclient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Linux/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4 -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 1241 -checkpoint 15 -np 7
00:53:18:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 2652
00:53:18:WU01:FS00:Core PID:2656
00:53:18:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 932292 -> 1546812 (decompressed 165.9 percent)
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=932292 data_size=1546812, decompressed_data_size=1546812 diff=0
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9013 (Run 689, Clone 1, Gen 73)
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
00:53:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
00:53:25:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Using Gromacs checkpoints
00:53:26:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Resuming from checkpoint
00:53:26:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.log
00:53:26:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.trr
00:53:26:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.xtc
00:53:26:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.edr
00:53:27:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 181220 out of 250000 steps  (72%)
00:54:15:Removing old file 'configs/config-20141127-075645.xml'
00:54:15:Saving configuration to /etc/fahclient/config.xml
00:54:15:<config>
00:54:15:  <!-- Network -->
00:54:15:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
00:54:15:
00:54:15:  <!-- Slot Control -->
00:54:15:  <power v='full'/>
00:54:15:
00:54:15:  <!-- User Information -->
00:54:15:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
00:54:15:  <user v='Nolan_Robidoux'/>
00:54:15:
00:54:15:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
00:54:15:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'/>
00:54:15:  <slot id='1' type='GPU'>
00:54:15:    <opencl-index v='0'/>
00:54:15:  </slot>
00:54:15:</config>
00:55:57:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 182500 out of 250000 steps  (73%)
01:00:53:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 185000 out of 250000 steps  (74%)
01:05:48:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 187500 out of 250000 steps  (75%)
01:10:46:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 190000 out of 250000 steps  (76%)
01:15:39:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 192500 out of 250000 steps  (77%)
01:20:35:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 195000 out of 250000 steps  (78%)
01:25:31:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 197500 out of 250000 steps  (79%)
01:30:29:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 200000 out of 250000 steps  (80%)
01:35:22:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 202500 out of 250000 steps  (81%)
01:40:17:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 205000 out of 250000 steps  (82%)
01:45:10:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 207500 out of 250000 steps  (83%)
01:50:05:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 210000 out of 250000 steps  (84%)
01:55:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 212500 out of 250000 steps  (85%)
01:59:55:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 215000 out of 250000 steps  (86%)
02:04:49:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 217500 out of 250000 steps  (87%)
02:09:44:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 220000 out of 250000 steps  (88%)
02:14:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 222500 out of 250000 steps  (89%)
02:19:32:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 225000 out of 250000 steps  (90%)
02:24:28:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 227500 out of 250000 steps  (91%)
02:29:21:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 230000 out of 250000 steps  (92%)
02:34:15:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 232500 out of 250000 steps  (93%)
02:39:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 235000 out of 250000 steps  (94%)
02:44:02:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 237500 out of 250000 steps  (95%)
02:48:55:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 240000 out of 250000 steps  (96%)
02:53:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 242500 out of 250000 steps  (97%)
02:58:43:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 245000 out of 250000 steps  (98%)
03:03:35:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 247500 out of 250000 steps  (99%)
03:03:36:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
03:03:36:WU00:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.124
03:03:37:WU00:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: RUNNING cpu:7 from 171.64.65.124
03:03:37:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.124:8080
03:03:37:WU00:FS00:Downloading 910.26KiB
03:03:39:WU00:FS00:Download complete
03:03:39:WU00:FS00:Received Unit: id:00 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:9013 run:323 clone:1 gen:30 core:0xa4 unit:0x00000029664f2de453e55410a5cee0f7
03:08:29:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 250000 out of 250000 steps  (100%)
03:08:30:WU01:FS00:0xa4:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
03:08:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
03:08:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Finished Work Unit:
03:08:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Reading up to 922512 from "01/wudata_01.trr": Read 922512
03:08:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:trr file hash check passed.
03:08:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Reading up to 845604 from "01/wudata_01.xtc": Read 845604
03:08:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:xtc file hash check passed.
03:08:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:edr file hash check passed.
03:08:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:logfile size: 26303
03:08:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Leaving Run
03:08:42:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Writing 1796907 bytes of core data to disk...
03:08:43:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Done: 1796395 -> 1733991 (compressed to 96.5 percent)
03:08:43:WU01:FS00:0xa4:  ... Done.
03:10:18:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Shutting down core
03:10:18:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
03:10:18:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
03:10:31:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
03:10:31:WU01:FS00:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:9013 run:689 clone:1 gen:73 core:0xa4 unit:0x00000051664f2de453e55626d9ab1329
03:10:31:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.65MiB to 171.64.65.124
03:10:31:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.124:8080
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:Starting
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: /usr/bin/FAHCoreWrapper /var/lib/fahclient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Linux/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4 -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 1241 -checkpoint 15 -np 7
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 2723
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:Core PID:2727
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Created dyn
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 931597 -> 1546812 (decompressed 166.0 percent)
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=931597 data_size=1546812, decompressed_data_size=1546812 diff=0
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9013 (Run 323, Clone 1, Gen 30)
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
03:10:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
03:10:39:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 0 out of 250000 steps  (0%)
03:11:39:WU01:FS00:Upload 3.78%
03:11:39:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Exception: Failed to send results to work server: Transfer failed
03:11:39:WU01:FS00:Trying to send results to collection server
03:11:39:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.65MiB to 171.65.103.160
03:11:39:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.65.103.160:8080
03:11:45:WU01:FS00:Upload complete
03:11:45:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
03:11:45:WU01:FS00:Final credit estimate, 991.00 points
03:11:45:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up
03:15:37:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps  (1%)
03:20:34:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps  (2%)
03:25:30:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps  (3%)
03:30:29:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps  (4%)
03:35:26:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps  (5%)
03:40:23:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 15000 out of 250000 steps  (6%)
03:45:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 17500 out of 250000 steps  (7%)
03:50:15:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 20000 out of 250000 steps  (8%)
03:55:13:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 22500 out of 250000 steps  (9%)
04:00:14:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 25000 out of 250000 steps  (10%)
04:05:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 27500 out of 250000 steps  (11%)
04:10:06:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 30000 out of 250000 steps  (12%)
04:15:04:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 32500 out of 250000 steps  (13%)
04:20:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 35000 out of 250000 steps  (14%)
04:25:03:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 37500 out of 250000 steps  (15%)
04:30:03:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 40000 out of 250000 steps  (16%)
04:35:04:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 42500 out of 250000 steps  (17%)
04:40:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 45000 out of 250000 steps  (18%)
04:41:08:Removing old file 'configs/config-20141127-082251.xml'
04:41:08:Saving configuration to /etc/fahclient/config.xml
04:41:08:<config>
04:41:08:  <!-- Network -->
04:41:08:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
04:41:08:
04:41:08:  <!-- Slot Control -->
04:41:08:  <power v='full'/>
04:41:08:
04:41:08:  <!-- User Information -->
04:41:08:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
04:41:08:  <user v='Nolan_Robidoux'/>
04:41:08:
04:41:08:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
04:41:08:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'/>
04:41:08:  <slot id='1' type='GPU'/>
04:41:08:</config>
04:41:59:Removing old file 'configs/config-20141127-082311.xml'
04:41:59:Saving configuration to /etc/fahclient/config.xml
04:41:59:<config>
04:41:59:  <!-- Network -->
04:41:59:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
04:41:59:
04:41:59:  <!-- Slot Control -->
04:41:59:  <power v='full'/>
04:41:59:
04:41:59:  <!-- User Information -->
04:41:59:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
04:41:59:  <user v='Nolan_Robidoux'/>
04:41:59:
04:41:59:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
04:41:59:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'/>
04:41:59:  <slot id='1' type='GPU'/>
04:41:59:</config>
04:45:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 47500 out of 250000 steps  (19%)
04:50:01:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 50000 out of 250000 steps  (20%)
04:54:58:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 52500 out of 250000 steps  (21%)
04:59:53:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 55000 out of 250000 steps  (22%)
05:04:49:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 57500 out of 250000 steps  (23%)
05:09:45:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 60000 out of 250000 steps  (24%)
05:14:43:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 62500 out of 250000 steps  (25%)
05:19:41:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 65000 out of 250000 steps  (26%)
05:24:35:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 67500 out of 250000 steps  (27%)
05:29:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 70000 out of 250000 steps  (28%)
05:34:26:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 72500 out of 250000 steps  (29%)
05:39:20:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 75000 out of 250000 steps  (30%)
05:44:18:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 77500 out of 250000 steps  (31%)
05:49:15:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 80000 out of 250000 steps  (32%)
05:54:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 82500 out of 250000 steps  (33%)
05:59:06:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 85000 out of 250000 steps  (34%)
06:04:01:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 87500 out of 250000 steps  (35%)
06:09:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 90000 out of 250000 steps  (36%)
06:14:01:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 92500 out of 250000 steps  (37%)
06:18:58:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 95000 out of 250000 steps  (38%)
06:23:51:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 97500 out of 250000 steps  (39%)
06:28:47:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 100000 out of 250000 steps  (40%)
06:33:43:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 102500 out of 250000 steps  (41%)
06:38:39:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 105000 out of 250000 steps  (42%)
06:43:35:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 107500 out of 250000 steps  (43%)
******************************* Date: 2014-11-28 *******************************
06:48:30:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 110000 out of 250000 steps  (44%)
06:53:25:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 112500 out of 250000 steps  (45%)
06:58:20:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 115000 out of 250000 steps  (46%)
07:03:15:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 117500 out of 250000 steps  (47%)
07:08:09:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 120000 out of 250000 steps  (48%)
07:13:07:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 122500 out of 250000 steps  (49%)
07:18:03:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 125000 out of 250000 steps  (50%)
07:22:58:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 127500 out of 250000 steps  (51%)
07:27:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 130000 out of 250000 steps  (52%)
07:32:50:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 132500 out of 250000 steps  (53%)
07:37:47:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 135000 out of 250000 steps  (54%)
07:42:44:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 137500 out of 250000 steps  (55%)
07:47:39:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 140000 out of 250000 steps  (56%)
07:52:35:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 142500 out of 250000 steps  (57%)
07:57:30:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 145000 out of 250000 steps  (58%)
08:02:25:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 147500 out of 250000 steps  (59%)
08:07:20:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 150000 out of 250000 steps  (60%)
08:12:15:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 152500 out of 250000 steps  (61%)
08:17:15:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 155000 out of 250000 steps  (62%)
08:22:13:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 157500 out of 250000 steps  (63%)
08:27:10:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 160000 out of 250000 steps  (64%)
08:32:07:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 162500 out of 250000 steps  (65%)
08:37:03:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 165000 out of 250000 steps  (66%)
08:41:59:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 167500 out of 250000 steps  (67%)
08:46:57:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 170000 out of 250000 steps  (68%)
08:51:54:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 172500 out of 250000 steps  (69%)
08:56:53:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 175000 out of 250000 steps  (70%)
09:01:53:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 177500 out of 250000 steps  (71%)
09:06:53:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 180000 out of 250000 steps  (72%)
09:11:53:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 182500 out of 250000 steps  (73%)
09:16:51:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 185000 out of 250000 steps  (74%)
09:21:50:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 187500 out of 250000 steps  (75%)
09:26:51:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 190000 out of 250000 steps  (76%)
09:31:47:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 192500 out of 250000 steps  (77%)
09:36:46:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 195000 out of 250000 steps  (78%)
09:41:44:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 197500 out of 250000 steps  (79%)
09:46:42:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 200000 out of 250000 steps  (80%)
09:51:39:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 202500 out of 250000 steps  (81%)
09:56:40:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 205000 out of 250000 steps  (82%)
10:01:42:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 207500 out of 250000 steps  (83%)
10:06:41:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 210000 out of 250000 steps  (84%)
10:11:38:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 212500 out of 250000 steps  (85%)
10:16:36:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 215000 out of 250000 steps  (86%)
10:21:35:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 217500 out of 250000 steps  (87%)
10:26:35:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 220000 out of 250000 steps  (88%)
10:31:34:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 222500 out of 250000 steps  (89%)
10:36:32:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 225000 out of 250000 steps  (90%)
10:41:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 227500 out of 250000 steps  (91%)
10:46:27:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 230000 out of 250000 steps  (92%)
10:51:24:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 232500 out of 250000 steps  (93%)
10:56:20:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 235000 out of 250000 steps  (94%)
11:01:14:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 237500 out of 250000 steps  (95%)
11:06:11:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 240000 out of 250000 steps  (96%)
11:11:07:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 242500 out of 250000 steps  (97%)
11:16:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 245000 out of 250000 steps  (98%)
11:20:57:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 247500 out of 250000 steps  (99%)
11:21:17:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Exception: Could not get IP address for assign3.stanford.edu: No address associated with hostname
11:21:17:ERROR:WU01:FS00:Exception: Could not get an assignment
11:21:37:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Exception: Could not get IP address for assign3.stanford.edu: No address associated with hostname
11:21:37:ERROR:WU01:FS00:Exception: Could not get an assignment
11:22:37:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Exception: Could not get IP address for assign3.stanford.edu: No address associated with hostname
11:22:37:ERROR:WU01:FS00:Exception: Could not get an assignment
11:24:14:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Exception: Could not get IP address for assign3.stanford.edu: No address associated with hostname
11:24:14:ERROR:WU01:FS00:Exception: Could not get an assignment
11:25:50:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 250000 out of 250000 steps  (100%)
11:25:50:WU00:FS00:0xa4:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
11:26:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
11:26:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Finished Work Unit:
11:26:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Reading up to 922512 from "00/wudata_01.trr": Read 922512
11:26:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:trr file hash check passed.
11:26:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Reading up to 845240 from "00/wudata_01.xtc": Read 845240
11:26:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:xtc file hash check passed.
11:26:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:edr file hash check passed.
11:26:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:logfile size: 25408
11:26:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Leaving Run
11:26:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Writing 1795648 bytes of core data to disk...
11:26:03:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Done: 1795136 -> 1733247 (compressed to 96.5 percent)
11:26:03:WU00:FS00:0xa4:  ... Done.
11:26:51:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Exception: Could not get IP address for assign3.stanford.edu: No address associated with hostname
11:26:51:ERROR:WU01:FS00:Exception: Could not get an assignment
11:27:38:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Shutting down core
11:27:38:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
11:27:38:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
11:27:51:WU00:FS00:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
11:27:51:WU00:FS00:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:9013 run:323 clone:1 gen:30 core:0xa4 unit:0x00000029664f2de453e55410a5cee0f7
11:27:51:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.65MiB to 171.64.65.124
11:27:51:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.124:8080
11:29:09:WU00:FS00:Upload 3.78%
11:29:09:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Exception: Failed to send results to work server: Transfer failed
11:29:09:WU00:FS00:Trying to send results to collection server
11:29:09:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.65MiB to 171.65.103.160
11:29:09:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.65.103.160:8080
11:29:13:WU00:FS00:Upload complete
11:29:13:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
11:29:13:WU00:FS00:Final credit estimate, 950.00 points
11:29:13:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up
11:30:56:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
11:30:57:WU01:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.124
11:30:57:WU01:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY cpu:7 from 171.64.65.124
11:30:57:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.124:8080
11:30:58:WU01:FS00:Downloading 902.71KiB
11:30:59:WU01:FS00:Download complete
11:30:59:WU01:FS00:Received Unit: id:01 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:9011 run:445 clone:1 gen:34 core:0xa4 unit:0x0000002b664f2de453c878ae3aab0b78
11:30:59:WU01:FS00:Starting
11:30:59:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: /usr/bin/FAHCoreWrapper /var/lib/fahclient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Linux/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4 -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 1241 -checkpoint 15 -np 7
11:30:59:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 2976
11:30:59:WU01:FS00:Core PID:2980
11:30:59:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Created dyn
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 923862 -> 1527780 (decompressed 165.3 percent)
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=923862 data_size=1527780, decompressed_data_size=1527780 diff=0
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9011 (Run 445, Clone 1, Gen 34)
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
11:31:00:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
11:31:07:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 0 out of 250000 steps  (0%)
11:36:04:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps  (1%)
11:40:59:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps  (2%)
11:45:56:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps  (3%)
11:50:52:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps  (4%)
11:55:45:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps  (5%)
12:00:41:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 15000 out of 250000 steps  (6%)
12:05:37:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 17500 out of 250000 steps  (7%)
12:10:33:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 20000 out of 250000 steps  (8%)
12:15:32:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 22500 out of 250000 steps  (9%)
12:20:31:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 25000 out of 250000 steps  (10%)
12:25:32:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 27500 out of 250000 steps  (11%)
12:30:30:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 30000 out of 250000 steps  (12%)
12:35:27:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 32500 out of 250000 steps  (13%)
12:40:26:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 35000 out of 250000 steps  (14%)
12:45:24:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 37500 out of 250000 steps  (15%)
******************************* Date: 2014-11-28 *******************************
12:50:20:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 40000 out of 250000 steps  (16%)
12:55:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 42500 out of 250000 steps  (17%)
13:00:17:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 45000 out of 250000 steps  (18%)
13:05:18:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 47500 out of 250000 steps  (19%)
13:10:16:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 50000 out of 250000 steps  (20%)
13:15:13:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 52500 out of 250000 steps  (21%)
13:20:11:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 55000 out of 250000 steps  (22%)
13:25:07:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 57500 out of 250000 steps  (23%)
13:30:02:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 60000 out of 250000 steps  (24%)
13:34:58:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 62500 out of 250000 steps  (25%)
13:39:55:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 65000 out of 250000 steps  (26%)
13:44:54:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 67500 out of 250000 steps  (27%)
13:49:50:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 70000 out of 250000 steps  (28%)
13:54:47:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 72500 out of 250000 steps  (29%)
13:59:46:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 75000 out of 250000 steps  (30%)
14:04:43:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 77500 out of 250000 steps  (31%)
14:09:38:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 80000 out of 250000 steps  (32%)
14:14:34:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 82500 out of 250000 steps  (33%)
14:19:30:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 85000 out of 250000 steps  (34%)
14:24:29:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 87500 out of 250000 steps  (35%)
14:29:28:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 90000 out of 250000 steps  (36%)
14:34:26:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 92500 out of 250000 steps  (37%)
14:39:24:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 95000 out of 250000 steps  (38%)
14:44:23:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 97500 out of 250000 steps  (39%)
14:49:20:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 100000 out of 250000 steps  (40%)
14:54:17:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 102500 out of 250000 steps  (41%)
14:59:15:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 105000 out of 250000 steps  (42%)
15:04:10:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 107500 out of 250000 steps  (43%)
15:09:07:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 110000 out of 250000 steps  (44%)
15:14:02:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 112500 out of 250000 steps  (45%)
15:18:55:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 115000 out of 250000 steps  (46%)
15:23:49:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 117500 out of 250000 steps  (47%)
15:28:45:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 120000 out of 250000 steps  (48%)
Mod Edit: Added code tags
nrobidoux
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:22 pm

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by nrobidoux »

7im wrote:CV wasn't suggesting you change to the green team, just that he was green and didn't have personal experience on the red team...
We're going to head down the spiral of over niceness but I'm stopping it here. :) I read some things too fast. I think I might have added that on my own... just because I know it would work, lol. Okay, I guess I didn't stop it. :)

Going to try the beta drivers. 14.9 is coming up as the most recent for me.
nrobidoux
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:22 pm

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by nrobidoux »

I guess versions above 14.9 are for Windows only. :/ I've commented out the "fold-anon" and "gpu" tags in my original xml file. Their original values were 'true' and 'false' respectively. I read that since values are defined further down with other tags, those values were overwritten anyway. I'll try whatever. Tried installing the 'fglrx' and 'fglrx-amdcccle' packages from the repository. No change.

I then removed (hopefully) all acpi packages and sane (as I was getting some crashes on boot). Fixed that. Sane caused the crashing. Tired of my computer sleeping so no acpi. Removed the fglrx packages I installed above. Turns out they seem to be Catalyst 12.4. Was going to reinstall 14.9. Instead of "installing" the fglrx drivers I "generated" the package when the choice was presented in the dialog box. (Ubuntu/precise option)

.... I have not seen much of a change. The only thing that it is apparent is that the GPU line changed slightly. It now reads:

Code: Select all

GPU:0:TAHITI PRO [RADEON R9 280/HD 7900/8950]
ETA: 10.2 days
Deadline: 12.03 days

... is that normal for project 13000 on a 7950 / R9 280? Have I been chasing a ghost? My watt meter reads 148W. Instead of 0% usage from "aticonfig --odgc" it says 4%.... progress. :)

To remove the driver when I was changing them around to test versions I used:

Code: Select all

sudo /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
Is that correct? .... maybe because I used dpkg to install and generated the packages I'm not seeing it anymore and have to use apt-get for the uninstall. 3 packages were generated: fglrx, fglrx-amdcccle, fglrx-dev. Saw the shell script anytime I used the *.run file for install and chose to 'install' instead of 'generate.'
nrobidoux
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:22 pm

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by nrobidoux »

I came across something in my searches....
https://folding.stanford.edu/home/guide/linux-install-guide/ wrote:
  • Folding on AMD GPUs is problematic in linux due to poor OpenCL driver suppport from AMD. Linux GPU folding is still in beta testing.
I switched to Windows 7 Home for testing. Not exactly apples to apples as it only supports 1 CPU but wattage is reading 249W (+~80W TDP for 2nd CPU if it could work would be about where I thought), CCC is indicating 100% GPU usage, ~2.2 seconds / 0.01%... I'll be buying 7 Pro to dual boot..... maybe to replace Win8 on my laptops! :D
JimF
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:03 pm

Re: Another Low PPD Thread

Post by JimF »

nrobidoux wrote: ETA: 10.2 days
Deadline: 12.03 days

... is that normal for project 13000 on a 7950 / R9 280? Have I been chasing a ghost? My watt meter reads 148W. Instead of 0% usage from "aticonfig --odgc" it says 4%.... progress. :)
On a P13001, I am getting an ETA of 20 1/2 hours and 68k PPD (12:16 TPF) on a HD 7870 with the 14.4 drivers (Win7 64-bit). It draws around 105 watts from the wall; with a 90% efficient power supply that is around 95 watts net power to the card.
Post Reply