PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) PPD?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Breach
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) PPD?

Post by Breach »

Hi,

I'm currently folding PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) on 3770K at 4.6Ghz. My PPD is 4278 with TPF 10 min 14 secs.As I'm still new to FAH not sure whether normal or not, but it does seem low to me? Using 7.3.6, CPU is at 100% load (all 8 threads). Also doing GPU folding in parallel.

Code: Select all

*********************** Log Started 2013-04-06T22:32:01Z ***********************
22:32:01:************************* Folding@home Client *************************
22:32:01:      Website: http://folding.stanford.edu/
22:32:01:    Copyright: (c) 2009-2013 Stanford University
22:32:01:       Author: Joseph Coffland <joseph@cauldrondevelopment.com>
22:32:01:         Args: --open-web-control
22:32:01:       Config: C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/config.xml
22:32:01:******************************** Build ********************************
22:32:01:      Version: 7.3.6
22:32:01:         Date: Feb 18 2013
22:32:01:         Time: 15:25:17
22:32:01:      SVN Rev: 3923
22:32:01:       Branch: fah/trunk/client
22:32:01:     Compiler: Intel(R) C++ MSVC 1500 mode 1200
22:32:01:      Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /Qdiag-disable:4297,4103,1786,279 /Ox -arch:SSE
22:32:01:               /QaxSSE2,SSE3,SSSE3,SSE4.1,SSE4.2 /Qopenmp /Qrestrict /MT /Qmkl
22:32:01:     Platform: win32 XP
22:32:01:         Bits: 32
22:32:01:         Mode: Release
22:32:01:******************************* System ********************************
22:32:01:          CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
22:32:01:       CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9
22:32:01:         CPUs: 8
22:32:01:       Memory: 7.88GiB
22:32:01:  Free Memory: 6.63GiB
22:32:01:      Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
22:32:01:  Has Battery: false
22:32:01:   On Battery: false
22:32:01:   UTC offset: 2
22:32:01:          PID: 4308
22:32:01:          CWD: C:/ProgramData/FAHClient
22:32:01:           OS: Windows 8 Pro with Media Center
22:32:01:      OS Arch: AMD64
22:32:01:         GPUs: 1
22:32:01:        GPU 0: NVIDIA:3 GK104 [GeForce GTX 670]
22:32:01:         CUDA: 3.0
22:32:01:  CUDA Driver: 5000
22:32:01:Win32 Service: false
22:32:01:***********************************************************************
22:32:01:<config>
22:32:01:  <!-- Folding Core -->
22:32:01:  <checkpoint v='10'/>
22:32:01:
22:32:01:  <!-- Folding Slot Configuration -->
22:32:01:  <power v='full'/>
22:32:01:
22:32:01:  <!-- Network -->
22:32:01:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
22:32:01:
22:32:01:  <!-- Slot Control -->
22:32:01:  <pause-on-battery v='false'/>
22:32:01:
22:32:01:  <!-- User Information -->
22:32:01:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
22:32:01:  <team v='845'/>
22:32:01:  <user v='Alexander_Ivanchev'/>
22:32:01:
22:32:01:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
22:32:01:  <slot id='0' type='GPU'/>
22:32:01:  <slot id='2' type='CPU'/>
22:32:01:</config>
22:32:01:Trying to access database...
22:32:01:Successfully acquired database lock
22:32:01:Enabled folding slot 00: READY gpu:0:GK104 [GeForce GTX 670]
22:32:01:Enabled folding slot 02: READY cpu:8
22:32:01:WU02:FS00:Starting
22:32:01:WU02:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/NVIDIA/Fermi/Core_15.fah/FahCore_15.exe -dir 02 -suffix 01 -version 703 -lifeline 4308 -checkpoint 10 -gpu 0 -gpu-vendor nvidia
22:32:01:WU02:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 3236
22:32:01:WU02:FS00:Core PID:1728
22:32:01:WU02:FS00:FahCore 0x15 started
22:32:01:WU01:FS02:Starting
22:32:01:WU01:FS02:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 703 -lifeline 4308 -checkpoint 10 -np 8
22:32:01:WU01:FS02:Started FahCore on PID 2128
22:32:01:WU01:FS02:Core PID:3564
22:32:01:WU01:FS02:FahCore 0xa4 started
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:*------------------------------*
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:Folding@Home GPU Core
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:Version                2.25 (Wed May 9 17:03:01 EDT 2012)
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:Build host             AmoebaRemote
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:Board Type             NVIDIA/CUDA
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:Core                   15
22:32:02:WU01:FS02:0xa4:
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:
22:32:02:WU01:FS02:0xa4:*------------------------------*
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:Window's signal control handler registered.
22:32:02:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:Preparing to commence simulation
22:32:02:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
22:32:02:WU02:FS00:0x15:- Ensuring status. Please wait.
22:32:02:WU01:FS02:0xa4:
22:32:02:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
22:32:02:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Ensuring status. Please wait.
22:32:03:3:127.0.0.1:New Web connection
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:- Looking at optimizations...
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:- Working with standard loops on this execution.
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:- Previous termination of core was improper.
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:- Files status OK
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:sizeof(CORE_PACKET_HDR) = 512 file=<>
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:- Expanded 58324 -> 257358 (decompressed 441.2 percent)
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=58324 data_size=257358, decompressed_data_size=257358 diff=0
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:- Digital signature verified
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:Project: 8070 (Run 43, Clone 8, Gen 7)
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:
22:32:11:WU02:FS00:0x15:Entering M.D.
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Working with standard loops on this execution.
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Previous termination of core was improper.
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Files status OK
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Expanded 108998 -> 443200 (decompressed 406.6 percent)
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=108998 data_size=443200, decompressed_data_size=443200 diff=0
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Project: 7085 (Run 0, Clone 891, Gen 9)
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:
22:32:11:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Entering M.D.
22:32:13:WU02:FS00:0x15:Tpr hash 02/wudata_01.tpr:  2115211127 3947659710 2124516579 1129211837 175691432
22:32:13:WU02:FS00:0x15:GPU device id=0
22:32:13:WU02:FS00:0x15:Working on Gallium Rubidium Oxygen Manganese Argon Carbon Silicon t=  43.00000
22:32:13:WU02:FS00:0x15:Client config unavailable.
22:32:13:WU02:FS00:0x15:Starting GUI Server
22:32:17:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Using Gromacs checkpoints
22:32:17:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Mapping NT from 8 to 8 
22:32:17:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Resuming from checkpoint
22:32:17:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.log
22:32:17:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.trr
22:32:17:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.xtc
22:32:17:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Verified 01/wudata_01.edr
22:32:17:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Completed 3000001 out of 10000000 steps  (30%)
22:33:14:WU02:FS00:0x15:Setting checkpoint frequency: 500000
22:33:14:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed         3 out of 50000000 steps (0%).
22:33:15:WARNING:WU02:FS00:Detected clock skew (1 mins 04 secs), adjusting time estimates
22:35:20:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed    500000 out of 50000000 steps (1%).
22:37:15:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   1000000 out of 50000000 steps (2%).
22:39:12:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   1500000 out of 50000000 steps (3%).
22:41:08:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   2000000 out of 50000000 steps (4%).
22:43:00:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Completed 3100000 out of 10000000 steps  (31%)
22:43:03:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   2500000 out of 50000000 steps (5%).
22:44:58:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   3000000 out of 50000000 steps (6%).
22:46:52:WARNING:WU02:FS00:Detected clock skew (1 mins 37 secs), adjusting time estimates
22:46:52:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   3500000 out of 50000000 steps (7%).
22:46:52:WARNING:WU01:FS02:Detected clock skew (1 mins 37 secs), adjusting time estimates
22:48:47:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   4000000 out of 50000000 steps (8%).
22:50:45:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   4500000 out of 50000000 steps (9%).
22:52:39:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   5000000 out of 50000000 steps (10%).
22:53:35:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Completed 3200000 out of 10000000 steps  (32%)
22:54:35:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   5500000 out of 50000000 steps (11%).
22:56:31:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   6000000 out of 50000000 steps (12%).
22:58:28:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   6500000 out of 50000000 steps (13%).
23:00:23:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   7000000 out of 50000000 steps (14%).
23:02:17:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   7500000 out of 50000000 steps (15%).
23:02:17:WARNING:WU02:FS00:Detected clock skew (1 mins 51 secs), adjusting time estimates
23:02:17:WARNING:WU01:FS02:Detected clock skew (1 mins 51 secs), adjusting time estimates
23:03:58:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Completed 3300000 out of 10000000 steps  (33%)
23:04:14:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   8000000 out of 50000000 steps (16%).
23:06:10:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   8500000 out of 50000000 steps (17%).
23:08:05:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   9000000 out of 50000000 steps (18%).
23:10:01:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed   9500000 out of 50000000 steps (19%).
23:11:56:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed  10000000 out of 50000000 steps (20%).
23:13:51:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed  10500000 out of 50000000 steps (21%).
23:14:12:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Completed 3400000 out of 10000000 steps  (34%)
23:15:47:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed  11000000 out of 50000000 steps (22%).
23:17:42:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed  11500000 out of 50000000 steps (23%).
23:19:38:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed  12000000 out of 50000000 steps (24%).
23:21:34:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed  12500000 out of 50000000 steps (25%).
23:23:29:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed  13000000 out of 50000000 steps (26%).
23:24:22:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Completed 3500000 out of 10000000 steps  (35%)
23:25:25:WU02:FS00:0x15:Completed  13500000 out of 50000000 steps (27%).
Thanks
Windows 11 x64 / 9800X3D PBO / 32GB DDR5 6400 1:1 / 5090 FE / Sennheiser 650 / PSU Corsair AX1600i
Top
jimerickson
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Hardware configuration: Parts:
Asus H370 Mining Master motherboard (X2)
Patriot Viper DDR4 memory 16gb stick (X4)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 gpu (X16)
Intel Core i7 8700 cpu (X2)
Silverstone 1000 watt psu (X4)
Veddha 8 gpu miner case (X2)
Thermaltake hsf (X2)
Ubit riser card (X16)
Location: ames, iowa

Re: PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) PPD?

Post by jimerickson »

both your cpu and gpu are starved for bandwidth. try reducing to smp 6 to free up a core for the gpu. i skipped smp 7 because it is problematic for some work units.
Top
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Contact PantherX

Re: PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) PPD?

Post by PantherX »

Here's my data from one of my CPUs from HFM.NET:

Min. Time / Frame : 00:09:32 - 12,028.87 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:09:43 - 11,690.05 PPD

If the system isn't dedicated, I would suggest that you run either SMP:7 or SMP:6. The reason is that any interruptions in the SMP folding, it will increase the TPF in a non-linear manner which will have a negative impact on the system. Also not that it may take sometime for PPD to be correctly calculated by FAHControl/Web Control.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Top
Breach
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Re: PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) PPD?

Post by Breach »

Okay, I switched to 6 CPU threads for good. How long should I wait before rechecking the PPD? Thanks.
Windows 11 x64 / 9800X3D PBO / 32GB DDR5 6400 1:1 / 5090 FE / Sennheiser 650 / PSU Corsair AX1600i
Top
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Contact PantherX

Re: PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) PPD?

Post by PantherX »

Tricky question... I would say 5 frames at least. Can be earlier though
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Top
Breach
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Re: PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) PPD?

Post by Breach »

My CPU PPD is still 4923, TPF 8 min 35 sec. Any other ideas?
Windows 11 x64 / 9800X3D PBO / 32GB DDR5 6400 1:1 / 5090 FE / Sennheiser 650 / PSU Corsair AX1600i
Top
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) PPD?

Post by P5-133XL »

Check your task manager: What is the amount of CPU being used and by what? It should be running under 100% because you are using 7 out of 8 cores for folding (6 for SMP and 1 for GPU). Is FAHControl using up a full core?
Image
Top
Breach
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Re: PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) PPD?

Post by Breach »

Thanks. In Task Manager FAH Core A4 uses about 95%. Here's the usage from PE:

Image
Windows 11 x64 / 9800X3D PBO / 32GB DDR5 6400 1:1 / 5090 FE / Sennheiser 650 / PSU Corsair AX1600i
Top
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: PRCG 7085 (0, 891, 9) PPD?

Post by P5-133XL »

I'd say it is running just fine. I don't see anything wrong other than you do not like the PPD you are getting. You can, if you want show the new log and it can be analyzed for a problem. Are you running something else like gaming while it is folding? Are you shutting down the computer or letting it go to sleep?
Image
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Issues with a specific WU”