FAH PPD seems low?

Igloo · Post by **Igloo** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:43 am

I have a 9800 GTX XXX - Putting about ~5300 PPD out, Plus a linux box doing ~400 PPD, A PS3 running fah constantly, and 3 more machines computing during the working hours...

Yet my PPD according to my signature seems low?

Any ideas?

Post by **toTOW** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:06 am

Do you run all systems 24/7 ?

Are you sure that you didn't misspell your username and/or team number ?

P5-133XL · Post by **P5-133XL** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:13 am

Check your Stanford stats and see if the listed number of clients (CPU's) that have returned a WU this last week matches the number of clients you are actually running.

Igloo · Post by **Igloo** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:00 pm

I'm sure i've not miss spelled it...

Active processors (within 7 days) 4

which seems to be missing 3...

I wish you could view what was running... I'm running passkeys on my GPU + linux box, So i'd expect them to work... It does appear to be drastically low... My GPU + Linux are 24/7 3 others are 9-5 (only slow systems giving ~110-200 ppd) and the PS3 is 24/7...

Post by **bruce** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:29 pm

Check the UserID on each of your machines to figure out which ones have not uploaded recently. (Multiple clients on the same Windows machine have the same UserID). Here is the last WU uploaded from each client belonging to ^Igloo^

50DCA5EC14XXXXXXXX x86 Intel Win XP 225 2008-11-21 12:38:31 4435 272 2 1
50DCA5EC14XXXXXXXX x86 Intel Win XP 682 2008-11-21 19:25:24 2611 1 838 52
453DE83731XXXXXXXX x86 Intel Win 2000 15 2008-12-01 02:41:44 4425 53 16 73
006816A51CXXXXXXXX GPU Win XP 480 2008-12-16 12:31:09 5014 1 456 273
7DE52AF31AXXXXXXXX x86 AMD Win - 1920 2008-12-30 02:46:46 2665 0 719 79
44186BA604XXXXXXXX x86 Intel Win 2000 225 2009-01-12 03:42:02 4435 298 0 2
71C84D4430XXXXXXXX x86 Intel Win XP 450 2009-01-12 09:02:05 3858 10179 0 16
F17A405451XXXXXXXX x86 - Linux - 225 2009-01-15 12:24:25 4436 19 3 6
7853305154XXXXXXXX x86 - Linux - 225 2009-01-18 06:40:31 4453 439 0 2
5F27E9620CXXXXXXXX PS3 - PS3 - 330 2009-01-21 03:10:30 5308 17 276 116
7DE52AF31AXXXXXXXX GPU AMD Win - 511 2009-01-21 06:40:07 5749 9 368 11

Igloo · Post by **Igloo** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:29 pm

They all seem to be there... How bizzare...

I will look in more detail later

Thankyou

Post by **bruce** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 1:04 am

The issue is that you were looking at a 7 day window which excludes those in red. Note the dates that they last submitted a WU.

7im · Post by **7im** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:43 am

No single point in time will be completely indicative of your folding performance. WUs turned in just before or just after a PPD snapshot from the Stats will push or pull the numbers up or down. A recent problem in the stats server at Stanford can affect what is reported in your stats signature. And the mix of work units varies over time, affecting PPD up or down slightly. It's better to look at the 7 day moving average, or some length of time longer than a single 3 hour update of the Stanford stats, which may or may not have updated correctly.

The line on this chart seems to be headed in the right direction after a recent problem. http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=366503

Igloo · Post by **Igloo** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:47 am

Aha, Thankyou for that

About 9.5k ppd if my chart reading skills are working

Folding Forum

FAH PPD seems low?

FAH PPD seems low?

Re: FAH PPD seems low?

Re: FAH PPD seems low?

Re: FAH PPD seems low?

Re: FAH PPD seems low?

Re: FAH PPD seems low?

Re: FAH PPD seems low?

Re: FAH PPD seems low?

Re: FAH PPD seems low?