It seems to me that this run got to 94%, shut down as it was running on batteries
and got wiped. Is this correct?
[07:30:35] Folding@Home Gromacs Core
[07:30:35] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[07:30:35]
[07:30:35] Preparing to commence simulation
[07:30:35] - Looking at optimizations...
[07:30:35] - Created dyn
[07:30:35] - Files status OK
[07:30:36] - Expanded 238702 -> 1166721 (decompressed 488.7 percent)
[07:30:36] - Starting from initial work packet
[07:30:36]
[07:30:36] Project: 4458 (Run 169, Clone 0, Gen 1)
[07:30:36]
[07:30:36] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[07:30:36] Entering M.D.
[07:30:42] Protein: p4458_Seq51_Amber03
[07:30:42]
[07:30:42] Writing local files
[07:31:57] Extra SSE boost OK.
[07:31:58] Writing local files
[07:31:58] Completed 0 out of 1500000 steps (0%)
[07:56:40] Writing local files
[07:56:40] Completed 15000 out of 1500000 steps (1%)
[08:21:36] Writing local files
[08:21:36] Completed 30000 out of 1500000 steps (2%)
[08:46:46] Writing local files
[08:46:46] Completed 45000 out of 1500000 steps (3%)
[09:19:00] + Paused
[09:19:00] + Running on battery power. Pausing work until computer is plugged in.
[20:04:58] + Working ...
[20:04:58] + Off battery, restarting core.
[20:04:58] Suspending work thread...
[20:04:58] Resuming work thread...
[20:15:30] Writing local files
[20:15:30] Completed 60000 out of 1500000 steps (4%)
[20:41:09] Writing local files
[20:41:09] Completed 75000 out of 1500000 steps (5%)
[21:06:20] Writing local files
[21:06:20] Completed 90000 out of 1500000 steps (6%)
...............
[08:30:51] Writing local files
[08:30:51] Completed 1395000 out of 1500000 steps (93%)
[08:55:31] Writing local files
[08:55:31] Completed 1410000 out of 1500000 steps (94%)
[09:12:39] + Paused
[09:12:39] + Running on battery power. Pausing work until computer is plugged in.
--- Opening Log file [January 9 21:00:01 UTC]
# Windows CPU Systray Edition #################################################
###############################################################################
Folding@Home Client Version 6.23
http://folding.stanford.edu
###############################################################################
###############################################################################
Launch directory: C:\Users\Nicholas\AppData\Roaming\Folding@home-x86
[21:00:01] - Ask before connecting: No
[21:00:01] - User name: silas_the_monk (Team 82447)
[21:00:01] - User ID: 28DEBC280E99DAA6
[21:00:01] - Machine ID: 1
[21:00:01]
[21:00:01] Loaded queue successfully.
[21:00:01] Initialization complete
[21:00:01]
[21:00:01] + Processing work unit
[21:00:01] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
[21:00:01] Core found.
[21:00:01] Working on queue slot 07 [January 9 21:00:01 UTC]
[21:00:01] + Working ...
[21:00:02]
[21:00:02] *------------------------------*
[21:00:02] Folding@Home Gromacs Core
[21:00:02] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[21:00:02]
Project: 4458 (Run 169, Clone 0, Gen 1)
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:49 pm
- Hardware configuration: 1. EEE PC (Linux)
2. HP Windows Vista - Contact:
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6394
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Project: 4458 (Run 169, Clone 0, Gen 1)
What happen to the computer while you where running on battery
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:49 pm
- Hardware configuration: 1. EEE PC (Linux)
2. HP Windows Vista - Contact:
Re: Project: 4458 (Run 169, Clone 0, Gen 1)
Nothing special. IS there a way of checking centrally what happened to this WU?toTOW wrote:What happen to the computer while you where running on battery
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6394
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Project: 4458 (Run 169, Clone 0, Gen 1)
No we can't.
But it will help if you post more of the FAHlog ... in your previous one, we don't see if the WU resumed fine or not ...
But it will help if you post more of the FAHlog ... in your previous one, we don't see if the WU resumed fine or not ...
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:49 pm
- Hardware configuration: 1. EEE PC (Linux)
2. HP Windows Vista - Contact:
Re: Project: 4458 (Run 169, Clone 0, Gen 1)
This is the relevant portion. Actually I remember now that I when I plugged the computer back in the Folding at home did not start automatically.
So I started it. That is the gap between 09:12:39 and 21:00:01.
Looking again I found this:
So I started it. That is the gap between 09:12:39 and 21:00:01.
Code: Select all
[08:55:31] Completed 1410000 out of 1500000 steps (94%)
[09:12:39] + Paused
[09:12:39] + Running on battery power. Pausing work until computer is plugged in.
--- Opening Log file [January 9 21:00:01 UTC]
# Windows CPU Systray Edition #################################################
###############################################################################
Folding@Home Client Version 6.23
http://folding.stanford.edu
###############################################################################
###############################################################################
Launch directory: C:\Users\Nicholas\AppData\Roaming\Folding@home-x86
[21:00:01] - Ask before connecting: No
Code: Select all
[21:00:02] Folding@Home Gromacs Core
[21:00:02] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[21:00:02]
[21:00:02] Preparing to commence simulation
[21:00:02] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
[21:00:19] - Looking at optimizations...
[21:00:19] - Working with standard loops on this execution.
[21:00:19] - Previous termination of core was improper.
[21:00:19] - Files status OK
[21:00:19] - Expanded 238702 -> 1166721 (decompressed 488.7 percent)
[21:00:19] - Checksums don't match (work/wudata_07.xtc)
[21:00:19] - Starting from initial work packet
[21:00:19]
[21:00:19] Project: 4458 (Run 169, Clone 0, Gen 1)
[21:00:19]
[21:00:19] Entering M.D.
[21:00:26] Protein: p4458_Seq51_Amber03
[21:00:26]
[21:00:26] Writing local files
[21:01:42] Writing local files
[21:01:42] Completed 0 out of 1500000 steps (0%)
[21:57:38] Writing local files
[21:57:38] Completed 15000 out of 1500000 steps (1%)
[22:53:44] Writing local files
[22:53:44] Completed 30000 out of 1500000 steps (2%)
[23:45:56] + Paused
[23:45:56] + Running on battery power. Pausing work until computer is plugged in.
[23:46:56] + Working ...
[23:46:56] + Off battery, restarting core.
[23:46:56] Suspending work thread...
[23:46:56] Resuming work thread...
[23:50:38] Writing local files
[23:50:38] Completed 45000 out of 1500000 steps (3%)
[00:49:11] Writing local files
[00:49:12] Completed 60000 out of 1500000 steps (4%)
[01:13:55] Opening C:\Users\Nicholas\AppData\Roaming\Folding@home-x86\MyFolding.html...
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6394
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Project: 4458 (Run 169, Clone 0, Gen 1)
The client didn't close in a nice way :
In the process, the checkpoint file has been corrupted :
Do you know why ?[21:00:02] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
[21:00:19] - Looking at optimizations...
[21:00:19] - Working with standard loops on this execution.
[21:00:19] - Previous termination of core was improper.
In the process, the checkpoint file has been corrupted :
[21:00:19] - Checksums don't match (work/wudata_07.xtc)
[21:00:19] - Starting from initial work packet
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:49 pm
- Hardware configuration: 1. EEE PC (Linux)
2. HP Windows Vista - Contact:
Re: Project: 4458 (Run 169, Clone 0, Gen 1)
Hmm. The machine did hang once recently, maybe then. In fact I can see that now it is working on the same WU and at 27%.
-
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
- Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional - Location: SF Peninsula
Re: Project: 4458 (Run 169, Clone 0, Gen 1)
Is this similar to the issue of pausing the client and then shutting down the computer w/o stopping the client? Iirc, that's known to trash the unit (at least it worked that way for me, when my son did that. ).