Project: 4596 (Run 25, Clone 150, Gen 27)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
anko1
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Location: SF Peninsula

Project: 4596 (Run 25, Clone 150, Gen 27)

Post by anko1 »

Maybe another bad WU?

Code: Select all

[05:35:59] + Closed connections
[05:35:59] 
[05:35:59] + Processing work unit
[05:35:59] Core required: FahCore_82.exe
[05:35:59] Core found.
[05:35:59] Working on Unit 08 [August 26 05:35:59]
[05:35:59] + Working ...
[05:35:59] - Calling 'FahCore_82.exe -dir work/ -suffix 08 -checkpoint 15 -verbose -lifeline 3368 -version 503'

[05:35:59] 
[05:35:59] *------------------------------*
[05:35:59] Folding@Home PMD Core
[05:35:59] Version 1.03 (September 7, 2005)
[05:35:59] 
[05:35:59] Preparing to commence simulation
[05:35:59] - Looking at optimizations...
[05:35:59] - Created dyn
[05:35:59] - Files status OK
[05:35:59] - Expanded 15746 -> 107612 (decompressed 683.4 percent)
[05:35:59] 
[05:35:59] Project: 4596 (Run 25, Clone 150, Gen 27)
[05:35:59] 
[05:35:59] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[05:35:59] Entering M.D.
[05:36:04] + New frame time estimate; Working...
[05:36:06] Going to send back what have done.
[05:36:06] logfile size: 5649
[05:36:06] - Writing 6169 bytes of core data to disk...
[05:36:06]   ... Done.
[05:36:06] 
[05:36:06] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[05:36:09] + New frame time estimate; Working...
[05:36:10] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[05:36:10] Sending work to server


[05:36:10] + Attempting to send results
[05:36:10] - Reading file work/wuresults_08.dat from core
[05:36:10]   (Read 6169 bytes from disk)
[05:36:10] Connecting to http://169.230.26.30:8080/
[05:36:10] Posted data.
[05:36:10] Initial: 0000; Conversation time very short, giving reduced weight in bandwidth avg
[05:36:10] - Uploaded at ~14 kB/s
[05:36:10] - Averaged speed for that direction ~44 kB/s
[05:36:10] + Results successfully sent
[05:36:10] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6359
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 4596 (Run 25, Clone 150, Gen 27)

Post by toTOW »

Yes :( (6 other similar reports)
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
anko1
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Location: SF Peninsula

Re: Project: 4596 (Run 25, Clone 150, Gen 27)

Post by anko1 »

Thanks, toTOW, for your responses. I'm reporting these under the assumption that it's helpful to the project. If not, let me know and I'll stop bothering everyone. ;-)

Edit - PS - I'm hoping the the other reports were found with your special mod tool. I tried searching for these units in this forum using the project as copied from the logs.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6359
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 4596 (Run 25, Clone 150, Gen 27)

Post by toTOW »

Yes of course I was using my (magic ?) tool ;)

Your reports are useful : as soon as Vince will see them, he'll manually remove the WU and see what's going wrong with it :)
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
anko1
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Location: SF Peninsula

Re: Project: 4596 (Run 25, Clone 150, Gen 27)

Post by anko1 »

Thanks, toTow. I meant "mod" as in moderator tool, but magic works for me, too!
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project: 4596 (Run 25, Clone 150, Gen 27)

Post by bruce »

toTOW wrote:Yes of course I was using my (magic ?) tool ;)

Your reports are useful : as soon as Vince will see them, he'll manually remove the WU and see what's going wrong with it :)
Some WUs need to be manually removed and others are processed automatically. Getting all the servers to handle them the same way is on the list of desired enhancements. The reports are good, in either case, especially when other donors can search for them and add their comment to the same thread.
nwkelley
Pande Group Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 9:43 pm

Re: Project: 4596 (Run 25, Clone 150, Gen 27)

Post by nwkelley »

thanks guys i'll make sure vince see's this one ;)

(if by chance he hasn't already)
Post Reply