FAHControl not woring, but web control does. How to fix?
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:31 pm
FAHControl not woring, but web control does. How to fix?
I have a new issue here. It seems like FAHControl is just stuck at "updating", but the GPUs are folding, and show up in web control. Any clue on how to fix this? Win10 64bit, 460.xx driver if it matters.
-
- Posts: 2522
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:12 am
- Location: Greenwood MS USA
Re: FAHControl not woring, but web control does. How to fix?
If I had to guess, your firewall is not allowing FAHcontrol out of your pc
Tsar of all the Rushers
I tried to remain childlike, all I achieved was childish.
A friend to those who want no friends
I tried to remain childlike, all I achieved was childish.
A friend to those who want no friends
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7937
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2 - Location: W. MA
Re: FAHControl not woring, but web control does. How to fix?
FAHControl should not need an external network connection, but it does need an internal connection. It uses port 36330 on the local IP 127.0.0.1 to connect with the FAHClient process. That does need to be allowed, check firewall or security settings to see if that is being blocked or not listed as "Private".
iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:31 pm
Re: FAHControl not woring, but web control does. How to fix?
I have disabled the firewall completely, still the same. Anything else I can try? This is a dedicated machine.
Re: FAHControl not woring, but web control does. How to fix?
This might be worth a look viewtopic.php?f=108&t=35474
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:31 pm
Re: FAHControl not woring, but web control does. How to fix?
I reinstalled a few times and it seems like it was something I did to the config, as it's working now. But not sure what, the only difference (I think?) was not setting 0.0.0.0/0 x2 for remote access.