Thanks, done.HaloJones wrote:You could merge the results for the "RX 5700XT" and the "RX 5700 XT"
I also deleted a few entries where PPD was way too low compared to average
Moderator: Site Moderators
Thanks, done.HaloJones wrote:You could merge the results for the "RX 5700XT" and the "RX 5700 XT"
Do it old-school like me! Walk to the machines!Endgame124 wrote:If I can figure out remote management, I can provide folding scores for:
APU (both CPU and integrated video)
A10-5800K
A10-7870K
Cpu:
Ryzen 7 2700X
GPU
R250X
Geforce 1080ti.
Is any compelling reason for me to collect any of those? If so, which ones?
+1 for the 1080ti!foldinghomealone wrote:I think 1080ti and R7 2700X are commonly used but under represented in the DB.
I would be happy to see some more data
I think there is a bug in hfm.net. Saw it also on a couple of GPUs where hfm was all over the place...foldinghomealone wrote: I also deleted a few entries where PPD was way too low compared to average
What was wrong? Was having a quick look this afternoon...NoMoreQuarantine wrote:
Edit: Just realized that my analysis was faulty. Deleted the link to the graphs until I can fix them.
The way I had done it was comparing "frame size" in atoms vs time/atoms processed. The problem is that that is not how OpenMM works; OpenMM simulates all of the atoms at once applying an integrator in steps. A frame is a snapshot of 1% of those integrator steps. I misunderstood the process and made charts that were incorrect.NormalDiffusion wrote:What was wrong? Was having a quick look this afternoon...
What's your TPF? I can calculate what your PPD should be.Kebast wrote:HFM is showing project 13872 at 727k PPD for my CPU. Normal range is around 160k.
That an HFM issue?
ProjectID ProjectRun ProjectClone ProjectGen FrameTimeNoMoreQuarantine wrote:What's your TPF? I can calculate what your PPD should be.Kebast wrote:HFM is showing project 13872 at 727k PPD for my CPU. Normal range is around 160k.
That an HFM issue?
That project is 154326 atoms large. I calculate the PPD should be 727378.3 with those TPF numbers for a total credit of 13470. It looks like that lines up with with amount of credits you received.Kebast wrote:ProjectID ProjectRun ProjectClone ProjectGen FrameTime
13872 0 1565 121 00:00:16
13872 0 2370 179 00:00:16
13872 0 3206 137 00:00:16
That's odd for sure. CPU is Ryzen 3800x, 15 threads.NoMoreQuarantine wrote:That project is 154326 atoms large. I calculate the PPD should be 727378.3 with those TPF numbers for a total credit of 13470. It looks like that lines up with with amount of credits you received.Kebast wrote:ProjectID ProjectRun ProjectClone ProjectGen FrameTime
13872 0 1565 121 00:00:16
13872 0 2370 179 00:00:16
13872 0 3206 137 00:00:16
That's pretty crazy. What CPU are you using?
Something must be off...it's only taking 28 minutes to complete.Kebast wrote:That's odd for sure. CPU is Ryzen 3800x, 15 threads.NoMoreQuarantine wrote:That project is 154326 atoms large. I calculate the PPD should be 727378.3 with those TPF numbers for a total credit of 13470. It looks like that lines up with with amount of credits you received.Kebast wrote:ProjectID ProjectRun ProjectClone ProjectGen FrameTime
13872 0 1565 121 00:00:16
13872 0 2370 179 00:00:16
13872 0 3206 137 00:00:16
That's pretty crazy. What CPU are you using?