FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

A forum for discussing FAH-related hardware choices and info on actual products (not speculation).

Moderator: Site Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
foldy
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by foldy »

FAHbench 2.3.2 for Windows build with OpenMM 7.4.1 Core_22 with mixed precision
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html

So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.
Assimilator1
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB

i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by Assimilator1 »

PantherX
Thanks for the update to the benchmarks :), totally agree about no point in gathering more for now.

So what is the long list of stress tests you use then? ;)
I was thinking of using OCCTs GPU stress test, but I wonder if it's artificially throttled as (IIRC) it's counted as a 'power virus'. As is furmark.
So I would like to know what is a realistic GPU stress test (as in not throttled, or drawing an unrealistic power load) with error reporting?
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
Neil-B
Posts: 1996
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by Neil-B »

You could tape over half the cooling fan slots to simulate animal hair/dust/other detritus that might realistically build up over time? … or put a cardboard box around the back of the case to simulate the tight spaces the kit might be squeezed into in an overcrowded home-office? … or randomly pull out the power lead to simulate spouse/kids wanting to plug in their stuff? … Realistic might vary dependant upon your circumstances … :) :lol:
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6359
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by toTOW »

foldy wrote:FAHbench 2.3.2 for Windows build with OpenMM 7.4.1 Core_22 with mixed precision
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html

So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.
I tested your version, but I'm seeing weird things on DHFR : it's not able to use 100% of my 1070, only 65% ... I can't explain why. GPU load is better on NAV with 95%. :?

There's also a CUDA option in your build, but it doesn't work. :(
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Assimilator1
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB

i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by Assimilator1 »

Neil-B wrote:You could tape over half the cooling fan slots to simulate animal hair/dust/other detritus that might realistically build up over time? … or put a cardboard box around the back of the case to simulate the tight spaces the kit might be squeezed into in an overcrowded home-office? … or randomly pull out the power lead to simulate spouse/kids wanting to plug in their stuff? … Realistic might vary dependant upon your circumstances … :) :lol:
Riiight, something like a stress test which doesn't trigger 'power virus' restrictions along with error reporting is more what I was thinking of :P.

foldy
Only just noticed your FaHbench link! I'll try it now :).
[update]Ok I've tried it now, at 1st I was getting very on/off GPU load, I then paused BOINC (but it had left a CPU core free for normal folding anyway, which works fine there) & I got a consistent GPU load, but it was only at 75-80%.
Here's a screenshot for ya. Main rig spec in sig. Btw, what mix of SP/DP did you go for? Or is that not chosen by the benchmark program?
Image
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by PantherX »

Assimilator1 wrote:...So what is the long list of stress tests you use then? ;)
I was thinking of using OCCTs GPU stress test, but I wonder if it's artificially throttled as (IIRC) it's counted as a 'power virus'. As is furmark.
So I would like to know what is a realistic GPU stress test (as in not throttled, or drawing an unrealistic power load) with error reporting?
This list of mine was last updated in 2016 since that was the last time I assembled by system. I haven't done any research into current stress test software... that might change next year if I decide to get myself a AMD Zen 3 + Nvidia 3000 Ti GPUs :mrgreen:
Catzilla Computer Benchmark: https://www.catzilla.com/download
Cinebench: https://www.maxon.net/en/support/downloads/
FurMark: https://geeks3d.com/furmark/downloads/
Heaven Benchmark: https://benchmark.unigine.com/heaven
IntelBurnTest: https://www.techpowerup.com/download/intelburntest/
Linpack Xtreme: https://www.techpowerup.com/download/linpack-xtreme/
MemTest86: https://www.memtest86.com/download.htm
Superposition Benchmark: https://benchmark.unigine.com/superposition
Tropics Benchmarks: https://benchmark.unigine.com/tropics
Valley Benchmark: https://benchmark.unigine.com/valley
stressapptest: https://github.com/stressapptest/stressapptest
Futuremark 3DMark 11: https://www.techpowerup.com/download/fu ... 3dmark-11/
MSI Kombustor: https://geeks3d.com/furmark/kombustor/downloads/
AIDA64 Extreme: https://www.aida64.com/downloads
Prime95: https://www.mersenne.org/download/
OCCT: https://www.ocbase.com/

I like stressing out CPU/GPU/RAM simultaneously as opposed to individual components. I also ensure that the ambient temperature is as high as possible... including using a heat as I like simulating the worst conditions my system would perform in. However, with what I have been reading about "automatic overclocking" I think in my next build, I will focus on maximum cooling and let the hardware do it's job as opposed to manually overclocking anything :)
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Assimilator1
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB

i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by Assimilator1 »

Thanks :), some I'm familiar with, I use OCCT for CPU testing & it's better than P95, so I don't use that anymore.
Heaven doesn't have error reporting for the free version, so I don't know how you would know when an error occurs? (out right crashes aside).
Furmark is detected by the drivers as a 'power virus' (as is one other I can't remember the name of), and so power is throttled for that test, so I'm not sure how good a test that makes it.
Are their any on your list which are GPU tests, do error testing+reporting & don't apply an 'unrealistic' load? Tall order I know! :D
I remember when ATITool would automatically lower GPU clock speeds on finding an error, magic! (didn't that become Furmark?).

Agreed about CPU overclocking, my Ryzen 3600 is the 1st CPU I haven't manually overclocked in over 20 yrs!
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by PantherX »

Assimilator1 wrote:...Are their any on your list which are GPU tests, do error testing+reporting & don't apply an 'unrealistic' load? Tall order I know! :D...
I never bothered to do reporting... I tend to sit in front my screen while all this runs and make notes on paper with a pencil... talk about old school :lol:
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Assimilator1
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB

i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by Assimilator1 »

Lol, you sit & watch the screen for hours?? :shock: :ewink:
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
Neil-B
Posts: 1996
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by Neil-B »

Hours isn't really old school .. PantherX probably means days :wink: :D :!: … although he is using a pencil not a slate :shock:
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
davidcoton
Posts: 1094
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by davidcoton »

I thought it was a lump of chalk on the cave wall :wink: :lol:
Image
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by PantherX »

Nah... I have upgraded to markings in the sand :mrgreen: Of course, if the wind blows, I have to start all over again :lol:
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
calkapokole
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:03 pm
Hardware configuration: Lenovo IdeaPad Y580: Chipset Intel HM76 | Socket G2 | BIOS 2.07
Display: 15.6" | 1920x1080 | LG LP156WF1-TLC1 | TN LED | glossy
CPU: Intel Core i7-3610QM | 2.3-3.3 GHz | 6 MB L3 | 22 nm | TDP 45 W
iGPU: Intel HD Graphics 4000 (GT2) | 22 nm | 16 Unified Shaders: 1100 Mhz
dGPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M (GK107) | 28 nm:
- 384 Unified Shaders: 835@1215 MHz (45.5% OC)
- 2 GB GDDR5 128 bit: 1000@1250 (5000 effective) MHz (25% OC)
RAM: Patriot | 16 GB | DDR3 1600 MHz | 11-11-11-28-1 | Dual Channel
SSD 1: Crucial MX200 | mSATA | 250 GB | Micron 16 nm 128 Gb MLC NAND
SSD 2: Crucial MX500 | 2.5" | 2 TB | Micron 256 Gb 64L 3D TLC NAND
HDD: WD Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT | 2.5" | 750 GB | 7200 RPM | 16 MB
ODD: Samsung SN-506BB | 4 MB | BD-RE XL
WiFi: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2200
OS: Windows 10 Pro (x64) | ForceWare 425.31 WHQL
Cooler: Zalman ZM-NC2000
Location: Poland

Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)

Post by calkapokole »

foldy wrote:FAHbench 2.3.2 for Windows build with OpenMM 7.4.1 Core_22 with mixed precision
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html

So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.
Just for fun I've benchmarked my GeForce GTX 660M (retired from active FAH duty a few years ago) ;-)

Compute: OpenCL
Precision: mixed
WU: real
Atoms: 64614
Accuracy Check: Enabled
NaN Check: Disabled
Run lenght: 5 mins
Score: 4.52456
Scaled Score: 13.6536
Image
Post Reply