FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Moderator: Site Moderators
Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Please read the forum rules before posting.
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
FAHbench 2.3.2 for Windows build with OpenMM 7.4.1 Core_22 with mixed precision
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html
So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html
So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
PantherX
Thanks for the update to the benchmarks
, totally agree about no point in gathering more for now.
So what is the long list of stress tests you use then?
I was thinking of using OCCTs GPU stress test, but I wonder if it's artificially throttled as (IIRC) it's counted as a 'power virus'. As is furmark.
So I would like to know what is a realistic GPU stress test (as in not throttled, or drawing an unrealistic power load) with error reporting?
Thanks for the update to the benchmarks

So what is the long list of stress tests you use then?

I was thinking of using OCCTs GPU stress test, but I wonder if it's artificially throttled as (IIRC) it's counted as a 'power virus'. As is furmark.
So I would like to know what is a realistic GPU stress test (as in not throttled, or drawing an unrealistic power load) with error reporting?
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
- Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21 - Location: UK
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
You could tape over half the cooling fan slots to simulate animal hair/dust/other detritus that might realistically build up over time? … or put a cardboard box around the back of the case to simulate the tight spaces the kit might be squeezed into in an overcrowded home-office? … or randomly pull out the power lead to simulate spouse/kids wanting to plug in their stuff? … Realistic might vary dependant upon your circumstances …



2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6411
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
I tested your version, but I'm seeing weird things on DHFR : it's not able to use 100% of my 1070, only 65% ... I can't explain why. GPU load is better on NAV with 95%.foldy wrote:FAHbench 2.3.2 for Windows build with OpenMM 7.4.1 Core_22 with mixed precision
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html
So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.

There's also a CUDA option in your build, but it doesn't work.

-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Riiight, something like a stress test which doesn't trigger 'power virus' restrictions along with error reporting is more what I was thinking ofNeil-B wrote:You could tape over half the cooling fan slots to simulate animal hair/dust/other detritus that might realistically build up over time? … or put a cardboard box around the back of the case to simulate the tight spaces the kit might be squeezed into in an overcrowded home-office? … or randomly pull out the power lead to simulate spouse/kids wanting to plug in their stuff? … Realistic might vary dependant upon your circumstances …![]()

foldy
Only just noticed your FaHbench link! I'll try it now

[update]Ok I've tried it now, at 1st I was getting very on/off GPU load, I then paused BOINC (but it had left a CPU core free for normal folding anyway, which works fine there) & I got a consistent GPU load, but it was only at 75-80%.
Here's a screenshot for ya. Main rig spec in sig. Btw, what mix of SP/DP did you go for? Or is that not chosen by the benchmark program?

Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
This list of mine was last updated in 2016 since that was the last time I assembled by system. I haven't done any research into current stress test software... that might change next year if I decide to get myself a AMD Zen 3 + Nvidia 3000 Ti GPUsAssimilator1 wrote:...So what is the long list of stress tests you use then?
I was thinking of using OCCTs GPU stress test, but I wonder if it's artificially throttled as (IIRC) it's counted as a 'power virus'. As is furmark.
So I would like to know what is a realistic GPU stress test (as in not throttled, or drawing an unrealistic power load) with error reporting?

Catzilla Computer Benchmark: https://www.catzilla.com/download
Cinebench: https://www.maxon.net/en/support/downloads/
FurMark: https://geeks3d.com/furmark/downloads/
Heaven Benchmark: https://benchmark.unigine.com/heaven
IntelBurnTest: https://www.techpowerup.com/download/intelburntest/
Linpack Xtreme: https://www.techpowerup.com/download/linpack-xtreme/
MemTest86: https://www.memtest86.com/download.htm
Superposition Benchmark: https://benchmark.unigine.com/superposition
Tropics Benchmarks: https://benchmark.unigine.com/tropics
Valley Benchmark: https://benchmark.unigine.com/valley
stressapptest: https://github.com/stressapptest/stressapptest
Futuremark 3DMark 11: https://www.techpowerup.com/download/fu ... 3dmark-11/
MSI Kombustor: https://geeks3d.com/furmark/kombustor/downloads/
AIDA64 Extreme: https://www.aida64.com/downloads
Prime95: https://www.mersenne.org/download/
OCCT: https://www.ocbase.com/
I like stressing out CPU/GPU/RAM simultaneously as opposed to individual components. I also ensure that the ambient temperature is as high as possible... including using a heat as I like simulating the worst conditions my system would perform in. However, with what I have been reading about "automatic overclocking" I think in my next build, I will focus on maximum cooling and let the hardware do it's job as opposed to manually overclocking anything

ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Thanks
, some I'm familiar with, I use OCCT for CPU testing & it's better than P95, so I don't use that anymore.
Heaven doesn't have error reporting for the free version, so I don't know how you would know when an error occurs? (out right crashes aside).
Furmark is detected by the drivers as a 'power virus' (as is one other I can't remember the name of), and so power is throttled for that test, so I'm not sure how good a test that makes it.
Are their any on your list which are GPU tests, do error testing+reporting & don't apply an 'unrealistic' load? Tall order I know!
I remember when ATITool would automatically lower GPU clock speeds on finding an error, magic! (didn't that become Furmark?).
Agreed about CPU overclocking, my Ryzen 3600 is the 1st CPU I haven't manually overclocked in over 20 yrs!

Heaven doesn't have error reporting for the free version, so I don't know how you would know when an error occurs? (out right crashes aside).
Furmark is detected by the drivers as a 'power virus' (as is one other I can't remember the name of), and so power is throttled for that test, so I'm not sure how good a test that makes it.
Are their any on your list which are GPU tests, do error testing+reporting & don't apply an 'unrealistic' load? Tall order I know!

I remember when ATITool would automatically lower GPU clock speeds on finding an error, magic! (didn't that become Furmark?).
Agreed about CPU overclocking, my Ryzen 3600 is the 1st CPU I haven't manually overclocked in over 20 yrs!
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
I never bothered to do reporting... I tend to sit in front my screen while all this runs and make notes on paper with a pencil... talk about old schoolAssimilator1 wrote:...Are their any on your list which are GPU tests, do error testing+reporting & don't apply an 'unrealistic' load? Tall order I know!...

ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Lol, you sit & watch the screen for hours??



Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
- Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21 - Location: UK
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Hours isn't really old school .. PantherX probably means days
… although he is using a pencil not a slate 




2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)
-
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:19 pm
- Location: Cambridge, UK
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Nah... I have upgraded to markings in the sand
Of course, if the wind blows, I have to start all over again 


ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:03 pm
- Hardware configuration: Lenovo IdeaPad Y580: Chipset Intel HM76 | Socket G2 | BIOS 2.07
Display: 15.6" | 1920x1080 | LG LP156WF1-TLC1 | TN LED | glossy
CPU: Intel Core i7-3610QM | 2.3-3.3 GHz | 6 MB L3 | 22 nm | TDP 45 W
iGPU: Intel HD Graphics 4000 (GT2) | 22 nm | 16 Unified Shaders: 1100 Mhz
dGPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M (GK107) | 28 nm:
- 384 Unified Shaders: 835@1215 MHz (45.5% OC)
- 2 GB GDDR5 128 bit: 1000@1250 (5000 effective) MHz (25% OC)
RAM: Patriot | 16 GB | DDR3 1600 MHz | 11-11-11-28-1 | Dual Channel
SSD 1: Crucial MX200 | mSATA | 250 GB | Micron 16 nm 128 Gb MLC NAND
SSD 2: Crucial MX500 | 2.5" | 2 TB | Micron 256 Gb 64L 3D TLC NAND
HDD: WD Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT | 2.5" | 750 GB | 7200 RPM | 16 MB
ODD: Samsung SN-506BB | 4 MB | BD-RE XL
WiFi: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2200
OS: Windows 10 Pro (x64) | ForceWare 425.31 WHQL
Cooler: Zalman ZM-NC2000 - Location: Poland
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Just for fun I've benchmarked my GeForce GTX 660M (retired from active FAH duty a few years ago)foldy wrote:FAHbench 2.3.2 for Windows build with OpenMM 7.4.1 Core_22 with mixed precision
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html
So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.

Compute: OpenCL
Precision: mixed
WU: real
Atoms: 64614
Accuracy Check: Enabled
NaN Check: Disabled
Run lenght: 5 mins
Score: 4.52456
Scaled Score: 13.6536