Minimum cores for a7

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Kebast
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:21 pm

Minimum cores for a7

Post by Kebast »

I have a 16 thread Ryzen 3800x that's been running fine on the a7 WUs. I need to remove a few threads from FAH though for other work. What's the minimum number of threads/cores that a7 WUs need? I think it used to be 8, is that still the case?
Image
Ryzen 5900x 12T - RTX 4070 TI
JimboPalmer
Posts: 2522
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:12 am
Location: Greenwood MS USA

Re: Minimum cores for a7

Post by JimboPalmer »

You need at least 1. I have a Core Duo with a GPU, so 2 CPUs but one reserved for the GPU.
Most of my desktops use 3
Tsar of all the Rushers
I tried to remain childlike, all I achieved was childish.
A friend to those who want no friends
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7922
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: Minimum cores for a7

Post by Joe_H »

The 8-core minimum was for the now defunct Bigadv projects using the A5 folding core. At this point all CPU folding cores older than A7 have been retired.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
JimF
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:03 pm

Re: Minimum cores for a7

Post by JimF »

Kebast wrote:I have a 16 thread Ryzen 3800x that's been running fine on the a7 WUs.
The last time I checked, there was a disproportionate drop in output as you remove cores.
I like to keep all of the cores of my Ryzen 3700x on FAH, and use other machines for other work.
JimboPalmer
Posts: 2522
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:12 am
Location: Greenwood MS USA

Re: Minimum cores for a7

Post by JimboPalmer »

Correct, the aptly named Quick Return Bonus gives you more points the quicker you return the Work Unit. This is separate from how many threads you need to fold. More is always better, (at least to 128 threads) but the minimum is 1. Over 128 threads you may need Linux or Windows Enterprise.
Tsar of all the Rushers
I tried to remain childlike, all I achieved was childish.
A friend to those who want no friends
Kebast
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:21 pm

Re: Minimum cores for a7

Post by Kebast »

JimF wrote:
Kebast wrote:I have a 16 thread Ryzen 3800x that's been running fine on the a7 WUs.
The last time I checked, there was a disproportionate drop in output as you remove cores.
I like to keep all of the cores of my Ryzen 3700x on FAH, and use other machines for other work.
Sure, but I need a few free for other things. I've still got the GPU churning out 500k per day anyway.
Image
Ryzen 5900x 12T - RTX 4070 TI
Athlonite
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:52 am
Hardware configuration: Asus Crosshair V Formula
AMD FX8320 @3.8GHz
Mushkin DDR3-2400MHz 8GB (2x4GB)
Sapphire Nitro+ RX580 *GB OC 1375/2000MHz
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB + 11TB's of HDD storage
Silverstone ST75F-P (750W) PSU & Silverstone raVen RV02B-W + USB3 Upgrade case
Location: Napier, NZ

Re: Minimum cores for a7

Post by Athlonite »

The min cores is 1 but I find 12 on my R7 3700X is a good base for throughput vs being able to do other things without interfering with folding
Asus Strix X470F Gaming
AMD R7 3700
16GB GSkill trident Z DDR4-3200
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB SATA SSD
Gigabyte RX580 8GB
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Minimum cores for a7

Post by bruce »

I don't know what you are reserving the cores for so my comment may not apply to you but FAHCore_a7 should be using N cores at a very low OS priority so that foreground activities will automatically receive preferential execution. Task Manager says the base priority for FAHCore* is "low"
Post Reply