ubuntu 20.04LTS and RX480

It seems that a lot of GPU problems revolve around specific versions of drivers. Though AMD has their own support structure, you can often learn from information reported by others who fold.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
devpao
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:31 am

ubuntu 20.04LTS and RX480

Post by devpao »

Are there hints of an easier linux support in next coming LTS release?
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6373
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: ubuntu 20.04LTS and RX480

Post by toTOW »

Until we get an update to the folding client, the newer Ubuntu version you try, the more problems you may encounter ...
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
EXT64
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:54 pm

Re: ubuntu 20.04LTS and RX480

Post by EXT64 »

Good question - though that may be more of a question for AMD and Linux than for Folding at home. Half the fun of linux is the victory at the end after hours or days of pain and suffering. Why would you want to take that away?
Darth_Peter_dualxeon
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2020 3:13 am
Hardware configuration: EVGA SR-2 motherboard
2x Xeon x5670 CPU
64 GB ECC DDR3
Nvidia RTX 2070

Re: ubuntu 20.04LTS and RX480

Post by Darth_Peter_dualxeon »

Hi, just saying, here in this topic viewtopic.php?f=61&t=33364 I wrote some of my experience so far. Mint is not very different from Ubuntu.
Rainmaker
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:59 pm
Hardware configuration: AMD Threadripper 3960X underclocked/undervolted to 3.7GHz 1.0125v
Asus RoG Strix TRX40-E Gaming motherboard
32GB DDR4 3600MHz 16,16,16,36 (Samsung B-Die)
Sapphire Vega 56 overclocked/undervolted to 1662MHz 1070mV
Samsung Evo Plus 1TB NVMe SSD
Linux FTW

Re: ubuntu 20.04LTS and RX480

Post by Rainmaker »

EXT64 wrote:Good question - though that may be more of a question for AMD and Linux than for Folding at home. Half the fun of linux is the victory at the end after hours or days of pain and suffering. Why would you want to take that away?
It's more a question for FaH really. Ubuntu 20.04 changes from 18.04 include removing python2.7, and some of the libraries FaH depends on have been renamed or removed. It'll need a client update to function in the new LTS release (or even install). AMD have already released a driver for 20.04 so their GPUs are covered at least.
ipkh
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 2:03 pm

Re: ubuntu 20.04LTS and RX480

Post by ipkh »

It's likely the fahclient will be fine. I haven't tested it yet but generally only the fahcontrol program has broken dependency problems. Work is underway to fix it up to modern libraries.
Rainmaker
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:59 pm
Hardware configuration: AMD Threadripper 3960X underclocked/undervolted to 3.7GHz 1.0125v
Asus RoG Strix TRX40-E Gaming motherboard
32GB DDR4 3600MHz 16,16,16,36 (Samsung B-Die)
Sapphire Vega 56 overclocked/undervolted to 1662MHz 1070mV
Samsung Evo Plus 1TB NVMe SSD
Linux FTW

Re: ubuntu 20.04LTS and RX480

Post by Rainmaker »

ipkh wrote:It's likely the fahclient will be fine. I haven't tested it yet but generally only the fahcontrol program has broken dependency problems. Work is underway to fix it up to modern libraries.
At the moment fahclient results in a fatal error, but of course 20.04 is still in beta.

Code: Select all

Setting up fahclient (7.5.1) ...
update-rc.d: error: no runlevel symlinks to modify, aborting!
dpkg: error processing package fahclient (--configure):
 installed fahclient package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 fahclient
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
ipkh
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 2:03 pm

Re: ubuntu 20.04LTS and RX480

Post by ipkh »

Ok, that's the script for fahclient to run at startup. They changed init systems since the fahclient package was made. This just means you need to start fahclient manually by using a terminal window.
It does make a little more complicated to add in a username and passkey, but it's not that hard to figure out.
Post Reply