New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6334
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by toTOW »

It's exactly the same as it doesn't change anything to the cores.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
ArVee
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:25 am

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by ArVee »

OK, but there's a radical difference in speed between SMP 5.91 and 5.92. Isn't this the same thing, or does the SMP variable change the equation?
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6334
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by toTOW »

There are more fluctuations in the SMP clients has they don't use the same MPI implementation, nor the same Fahcores.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by 7im »

ArVee wrote:How do the v6 versions compare to the 5.04 version speedwise? I'm asking specifically with regard to the new Amber units but observations in general are welcome too.

The client's don't do any folding. The Fahcores do all the folding. Upgrading a client typcially does not change folding speed. And with SMP v5.92, the client change didn't change the speed, but the new fahcore that came with the client version may have changed the speed. ;)
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
John_Weatherman
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:31 am
Location: Carrizo Plain National Monument, California
Contact:

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by John_Weatherman »

Project 4555 WUs really wiz by - and 500 PPD too - whoopee! :D
sneakers55
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by sneakers55 »

John_Weatherman wrote:Project 4555 WUs really wiz by - and 500 PPD too - whoopee!
You must be using an AMD chip, on AMBER calculations my one AMD (which is the slowest of the three on GROMACS) takes off.

So does the CPU cooling fan. When only one core is folding, you can tell because there is a strange silence in the room.
AMD Athlon X2 Dual Core 4200+ (2.2 GHz)
Intel C2D 6400 (2.13 GHz)
Intel C2D T7800 (2.6 GHz)
PS3
martiou
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 12:13 pm
Location: France

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by martiou »

Why can't we have these WU's when port 8080 is blocked and assignment server is assign2.stanford.edu:80 ?

At home, I have these WU's on my AMD 2000+ because assignment serveur is assign.stanford.edu:8080
But at work I only have p2170 on all clients (AMD 3000+, Celeron 2000,...) configured with -advmethods because port 8080 is blocked and assignment server is assign2.stanford.edu:80.

When I see all these WU's my AMD 2000+ calculate (minimum 2-3 per day) I could calculate more and more with clients at work.
[Ars] For Caitlin
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:06 pm
Hardware configuration: Two homebuilt rigs. Radeon 6900XT. Nvidia 2060 Super.

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by [Ars] For Caitlin »

sneakers55 wrote:
John_Weatherman wrote:Project 4555 WUs really wiz by - and 500 PPD too - whoopee!
You must be using an AMD chip, on AMBER calculations my one AMD (which is the slowest of the three on GROMACS) takes off.

So does the CPU cooling fan. When only one core is folding, you can tell because there is a strange silence in the room.
My old, tired, Athlon XP at 1600 MHz is doing 200 PPD! These Ambers love AMD, too bad that's my only AMD box. Runs rather warm at 60C, but it always has.
vvoelz
Pande Group Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Temple University, Philadelphia PA

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by vvoelz »

Even more -advmethods Amber WUs. Three more to be exact. 4558, 4559, and 4560 will go online later today.
(see http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/fahproject?p=4558 for points: )
--Vince
p.s. (There are three more coming too, in a bit.)
anko1
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Location: SF Peninsula

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by anko1 »

I've noticed (or at least it appears to me) that the projects seem to come out in groups of 119.30, 84.70 and 47.00 points. Is this coincidence or a function of different experiments for a larger project?

Are these projects using fewer runs or are they just getting finished sooner? So far the "furthest (?)," "oldest (?)" run I've seen on a 45xx is a run 17.

Also, I know within a group of WUs, each gen for a particular run and clone is dependent on the prior generation being finished, but is one clone dependent on a prior clone being finished?

Thanks,


Angela
vvoelz
Pande Group Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Temple University, Philadelphia PA

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by vvoelz »

anko1 wrote:I've noticed (or at least it appears to me) that the projects seem to come out in groups of 119.30, 84.70 and 47.00 points. Is this coincidence or a function of different experiments for a larger project?
These are different experiments for a larger project. We are investigating the role of local structuring in protein folding, simulating 8-, 12- and 16-residue fragments of a larger protein sequence.
anko1 wrote:Are these projects using fewer runs or are they just getting finished sooner? So far the "furthest (?)," "oldest (?)" run I've seen on a 45xx is a run 17.
We and our collaborators are participating in a "blind" assessment, in which a third party selects protein sequences, and we have a limited time to simulate them. This is why you will see projects coming online, and later going away.
anko1 wrote:Also, I know within a group of WUs, each gen for a particular run and clone is dependent on the prior generation being finished, but is one clone dependent on a prior clone being finished?
No. The clones are designed to be statistically independent simulations, the data from which can be combined when we analyze the results.

Vince
vvoelz
Pande Group Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Temple University, Philadelphia PA

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by vvoelz »

As promised, three more of these are coming online soon. Expect 4561, 4562, and 4563 by later today.
(again, see http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/fahproject?p=4561 for points)
anko1
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Location: SF Peninsula

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by anko1 »

Thanks for the answers to my questions, Vince.

Angela
vvoelz
Pande Group Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Temple University, Philadelphia PA

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by vvoelz »

Heads up for new AMBER -advmethods targets 4564, 4565, and 4566 going online.
(as always, see http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/fahproject?p=4564 for points)
--Vince
vvoelz
Pande Group Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Temple University, Philadelphia PA

Re: New Bonus Amber Core WU's [-advmethods option]

Post by vvoelz »

At the risk of sounding repetitive: heads up for new AMBER -advmethods targets 4567, 4568, and 4569 going online soon.
(as always, see http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/fahproject?p=4567 for points)
--Vince
Post Reply