Work Unit Statistics from Stanford

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
zodac
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:17 pm

Work Unit Statistics from Stanford

Post by zodac »

Do Stanford have a system in place that counts the number of each WU project that's been sent out in a day?

Like how many Project 6012 WUs, or Project 5745 WUs were given out, successfully returned, not returned, failed each day?

And if not, is it a possibility?
Image
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford

Post by bruce »

It's certainly POSSIBLE to design a system that would count WUs like that but
1) If there is a system such as that in place, I don't know about it and I don't have access to the data.
2) If there is no such system, I doubt that there will be one added. A simple cost-benefit analysis says that there probably is no scientific benefit of such a system and there would be a cost to build such a system and to gather the data and report the totals.

Personally, I like the idea, but item 2 overrules my preferences.
zodac
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:17 pm

Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford

Post by zodac »

But would it be that difficult to implement? The already have the number of WUs in each serve on the server page; it wouldn't take much for them to count them all up.

Then a site like EOC could take those stats and jazz them up a bit.
Image
RAH
Posts: 131
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:29 am
Hardware configuration: 1. C2Q 8200@2880 / W7Pro64 / SMP2 / 2 GPU - GTS250/GTS450
2. C2D 6300@3600 / XPsp3 / SMP2 / 1 GPU - GT240
Location: Florida

Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford

Post by RAH »

With the old PG stats pages, I would think that would be fairly easy to do. As it did count each WU type done
per folder. But since they have stopped it, don't know if it can be brought back up, or if its compatiable with
the new software.
Image
zodac
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:17 pm

Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford

Post by zodac »

So, this forum is the best place to make suggestions, right?

Or should I try and get in contact some other way? I'd quite like to see this happen. It surely can't be as difficult as coding the new clients. ;)
Image
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford

Post by 7im »

Yes, this is the right place.

However, as mentioned above, difficulty is not the hurdle here. Cost/Benefit analysis puts something like this somewhat lower on the priority list, than say, coding new clients. ;)
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford

Post by VijayPande »

Sorry, this one is low on the priority list, esp since we are in the midst of a complete code overhaul (new WS, new client in the works).
Prof. Vijay Pande, PhD
Departments of Chemistry, Structural Biology, and Computer Science
Chair, Biophysics
Director, Folding@home Distributed Computing Project
Stanford University
zodac
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:17 pm

Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford

Post by zodac »

Alright, now that i know that it is actually on the list, I can sleep sound. :D

Thanks.
Image
Post Reply