Do Stanford have a system in place that counts the number of each WU project that's been sent out in a day?
Like how many Project 6012 WUs, or Project 5745 WUs were given out, successfully returned, not returned, failed each day?
And if not, is it a possibility?
Work Unit Statistics from Stanford
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford
It's certainly POSSIBLE to design a system that would count WUs like that but
1) If there is a system such as that in place, I don't know about it and I don't have access to the data.
2) If there is no such system, I doubt that there will be one added. A simple cost-benefit analysis says that there probably is no scientific benefit of such a system and there would be a cost to build such a system and to gather the data and report the totals.
Personally, I like the idea, but item 2 overrules my preferences.
1) If there is a system such as that in place, I don't know about it and I don't have access to the data.
2) If there is no such system, I doubt that there will be one added. A simple cost-benefit analysis says that there probably is no scientific benefit of such a system and there would be a cost to build such a system and to gather the data and report the totals.
Personally, I like the idea, but item 2 overrules my preferences.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford
But would it be that difficult to implement? The already have the number of WUs in each serve on the server page; it wouldn't take much for them to count them all up.
Then a site like EOC could take those stats and jazz them up a bit.
Then a site like EOC could take those stats and jazz them up a bit.
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:29 am
- Hardware configuration: 1. C2Q 8200@2880 / W7Pro64 / SMP2 / 2 GPU - GTS250/GTS450
2. C2D 6300@3600 / XPsp3 / SMP2 / 1 GPU - GT240 - Location: Florida
Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford
With the old PG stats pages, I would think that would be fairly easy to do. As it did count each WU type done
per folder. But since they have stopped it, don't know if it can be brought back up, or if its compatiable with
the new software.
per folder. But since they have stopped it, don't know if it can be brought back up, or if its compatiable with
the new software.
Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford
So, this forum is the best place to make suggestions, right?
Or should I try and get in contact some other way? I'd quite like to see this happen. It surely can't be as difficult as coding the new clients.
Or should I try and get in contact some other way? I'd quite like to see this happen. It surely can't be as difficult as coding the new clients.
-
- Posts: 10179
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford
Yes, this is the right place.
However, as mentioned above, difficulty is not the hurdle here. Cost/Benefit analysis puts something like this somewhat lower on the priority list, than say, coding new clients.
However, as mentioned above, difficulty is not the hurdle here. Cost/Benefit analysis puts something like this somewhat lower on the priority list, than say, coding new clients.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
-
- Pande Group Member
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
- Location: Stanford
Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford
Sorry, this one is low on the priority list, esp since we are in the midst of a complete code overhaul (new WS, new client in the works).
Prof. Vijay Pande, PhD
Departments of Chemistry, Structural Biology, and Computer Science
Chair, Biophysics
Director, Folding@home Distributed Computing Project
Stanford University
Departments of Chemistry, Structural Biology, and Computer Science
Chair, Biophysics
Director, Folding@home Distributed Computing Project
Stanford University
Re: Work Unit Statistics from Stanford
Alright, now that i know that it is actually on the list, I can sleep sound.
Thanks.
Thanks.