171.67.108.22 (bigadv) Missing credits?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

orion
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:45 pm
Hardware configuration: 4p/4 MC ES @ 3.0GHz/32GB
4p/4x6128 @ 2.47GHz/32GB
2p/2 IL ES @ 2.7GHz/16GB
1p/8150/8GB
1p/1090T/4GB
Location: neither here nor there

Re: Project: 2681 (Run 3, Clone 3, Gen 89)

Post by orion »

Odd, a team M8 of mine had the same thing happen to him yesterday also.

P2861 (0,18,87)

brackney
36837
iustus quia...
Karamiekos
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:27 am

Re: Project: 2681 (Run 3, Clone 3, Gen 89)

Post by Karamiekos »

I seem to have taken a hit too. I did not receive points for this work unit.

Code: Select all

[05:27:58] Sending work to server
[05:27:58] Project: 2681 (Run 0, Clone 4, Gen 91)
[05:27:58] + Attempting to send results [March 21 05:27:58 UTC]
[05:27:58] - Reading file work/wuresults_03.dat from core
[05:27:58]   (Read 100186002 bytes from disk)
[05:27:58] Connecting to http://171.67.108.22:8080/
[05:28:35] Posted data.
[05:28:36] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~2574 kB/s
[05:28:36] - Averaged speed for that direction ~1706 kB/s
[05:28:36] + Results successfully sent
Zakk Wylde, "Then you start firing back some cocktails."
Rigs
Phenom II 965 With 2 4850s Running BOINC
Quad 8356s Running BOINC
Punchy
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:49 am

Re: Project: 2681 (Run 3, Clone 3, Gen 89)

Post by Punchy »

Wow Karamiekos, did you really upload 100MB in 38 seconds?
Karamiekos
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:27 am

Re: Project: 2681 (Run 3, Clone 3, Gen 89)

Post by Karamiekos »

Fiber optics baby. Hot fresh light. :)
Zakk Wylde, "Then you start firing back some cocktails."
Rigs
Phenom II 965 With 2 4850s Running BOINC
Quad 8356s Running BOINC
ChelseaOilman
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: Colorado @ 10,000 feet

171.67.108.22 (bigadv) Missing credits?

Post by ChelseaOilman »

From this thread people are reporting missing credit for bigadv WUs.
Edit by Mod: Threads Merged.

Project: 2681 (Run 3, Clone 3, Gen 89) Donor: orion Team: 36837
Project: 2681 (Run 0, Clone 18, Gen 87) Donor: brackney Team: 36837
Project: 2681 (Run 0, Clone 4, Gen 91) Donor: Karamiekos Team: 36837

I'm seem to be missing credit for one of My WUs from this server as well.

Project: 2681 (Run 8, Clone 15, Gen 67)

Code: Select all

[07:08:07] Completed 250000 out of 250000 steps  (100%)
[07:08:16] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
[07:08:26] 
[07:08:26] Finished Work Unit:
[07:08:26] - Reading up to 52713120 from "work/wudata_09.trr": Read 52713120
[07:08:27] trr file hash check passed.
[07:08:27] - Reading up to 42831784 from "work/wudata_09.xtc": Read 42831784
[07:08:27] xtc file hash check passed.
[07:08:27] edr file hash check passed.
[07:08:27] logfile size: 208407
[07:08:27] Leaving Run
[07:08:31] - Writing 95918227 bytes of core data to disk...
[07:08:34]   ... Done.
[07:08:51] - Shutting down core
[07:08:51] 
[07:08:51] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[07:11:51] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[07:11:51] Unit 9 finished with 59 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[07:11:51] Updated performance fraction: 0.635444
[07:11:51] Sending work to server
[07:11:51] Project: 2681 (Run 8, Clone 15, Gen 67)


[07:11:51] + Attempting to send results [March 21 07:11:51 UTC]
[07:11:51] - Reading file work/wuresults_09.dat from core
[07:11:51]   (Read 95918227 bytes from disk)
[07:11:51] Connecting to http://171.67.108.22:8080/
[07:28:41] Posted data.
[07:28:41] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~92 kB/s
[07:28:42] - Averaged speed for that direction ~60 kB/s
[07:28:42] + Results successfully sent
[07:28:42] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
DrSpalding
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 4:48 pm
Hardware configuration: Dell Studio 425 MTS-Core i7-920 c0 stock
evga SLI 3x o/c Core i7-920 d0 @ 3.9GHz + nVidia GTX275
Dell 5150 + nVidia 9800GT

Re: 171.67.108.22 Missing credits?

Post by DrSpalding »

I too have a possibly disappeared bigadv WU. It has not shown up in the stats yet but successfully uploaded at approximately 07:45 PDT today:
Project: 2681 (Run 3, Clone 4, Gen 83)

Code: Select all

[14:40:51] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
[14:41:01]
[14:41:01] Finished Work Unit:
[14:41:01] - Reading up to 52713120 from "work/wudata_07.trr": Read 52713120
[14:41:01] trr file hash check passed.
[14:41:01] - Reading up to 47028360 from "work/wudata_07.xtc": Read 47028360
[14:41:03] xtc file hash check passed.
[14:41:03] edr file hash check passed.
[14:41:03] logfile size: 206829
[14:41:03] Leaving Run
[14:41:04] - Writing 100113225 bytes of core data to disk...
[14:41:08]   ... Done.
[14:44:22] - Shutting down core
[14:44:22]
[14:44:22] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[14:44:38] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[14:44:38] Sending work to server
[14:44:38] Project: 2681 (Run 3, Clone 4, Gen 83)


[14:44:38] + Attempting to send results [March 21 14:44:38 UTC]
[14:50:53] + Results successfully sent
[14:50:53] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[14:50:53] + Number of Units Completed: 43
Is there a problem with the work server 171.67.108.22 or collection server 171.67.108.25 that is keeping it from promoting the stats to the database? The server status page doesn't seem to indicate anything wrong at a glance.
Not a real doctor, I just play one on the 'net!
Image
ChelseaOilman
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: Colorado @ 10,000 feet

Re: 171.67.108.22 Missing credits?

Post by ChelseaOilman »

DrSpalding wrote:I too have a possibly disappeared bigadv WU. It has not shown up in the stats yet but successfully uploaded at approximately 07:45 PDT today:
Project: 2681 (Run 3, Clone 4, Gen 83)
It didn't receive credit yet.
Project 2681, Run 3, Clone 4, Gen 83
No data back from query
ChelseaOilman
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: Colorado @ 10,000 feet

Re: 171.67.108.22 Missing credits?

Post by ChelseaOilman »

Here's another missing WU from donor musky.

Project: 2681 (Run 4, Clone 4, Gen 77)

Code: Select all

[09:39:40] Finished Work Unit:
[09:39:40] - Reading up to 52713120 from "work/wudata_04.trr": Read 52713120
[09:39:41] trr file hash check passed.
[09:39:41] - Reading up to 42794636 from "work/wudata_04.xtc": Read 42794636
[09:39:41] xtc file hash check passed.
[09:39:41] edr file hash check passed.
[09:39:41] logfile size: 208908
[09:39:41] Leaving Run
[09:39:41] - Writing 95881972 bytes of core data to disk...
[09:39:46]   ... Done.
[09:40:53] - Shutting down core
[09:40:53] 
[09:40:53] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[09:43:05] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[09:43:05] Unit 4 finished with 56 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[09:43:05] Updated performance fraction: 0.612017
[09:43:05] Sending work to server
[09:43:05] Project: 2681 (Run 4, Clone 4, Gen 77)


[09:43:05] + Attempting to send results [March 21 09:43:05 UTC]
[09:43:05] - Reading file work/wuresults_04.dat from core
[09:43:05]   (Read 95881972 bytes from disk)
[09:43:05] Connecting to http://171.67.108.22:8080/
[09:55:09] Posted data.
[09:55:09] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~129 kB/s
[09:55:10] - Averaged speed for that direction ~120 kB/s
[09:55:10] + Results successfully sent
[09:55:10] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
bollix47
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: 171.67.108.22 Missing credits?

Post by bollix47 »

FWIW

Two bigadv WUs uploaded here today and both resulted in their appropriate credits .... so the 'problem' is not universal.

Is there a chance the same WU was assigned twice resulting in no credit for the second one? If you're using HFM it stores all WUs processed in a file called CompletedUnits.csv which can be imported into a spreadsheet and sorted by project to easily identify duplicates. It also shows the current queue. Also, qd might show a duplicate if one occurred recently.

Just grasping at straws. :?
Image
ChelseaOilman
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: Colorado @ 10,000 feet

Re: 171.67.108.22 Missing credits?

Post by ChelseaOilman »

bollix47 wrote:Two bigadv WUs uploaded here today and both resulted in their appropriate credits .... so the 'problem' is not universal.
The problem may be "universal", it's just not currently happening. This seems to affect WUs uploaded during the night. I uploaded a bigadv WU this morning and got credit for it.
bollix47 wrote:Is there a chance the same WU was assigned twice resulting in no credit for the second one?
That didn't happen in my case. I checked before posting.
bollix47
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: 171.67.108.22 Missing credits?

Post by bollix47 »

One of the two uploaded around midnight and the other around noon .... both eastern time.
That didn't happen in my case. I checked before posting.
Sorry, of course, you have access to the db. :oops:
Image
ChelseaOilman
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: Colorado @ 10,000 feet

Re: 171.67.108.22 (bigadv) Missing credits?

Post by ChelseaOilman »

here's another missing WU from donor Axdrenalin.

Project: 2681 (Run 3, Clone 3, Gen 89)

Code: Select all

[16:16:57] Completed 250000 out of 250000 steps  (100%)
[16:17:07] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
[16:17:17] 
[16:17:17] Finished Work Unit:
[16:17:17] - Reading up to 52713120 from "work/wudata_09.trr": Read 52713120
[16:17:17] trr file hash check passed.
[16:17:17] - Reading up to 47025772 from "work/wudata_09.xtc": Read 47025772
[16:17:18] xtc file hash check passed.
[16:17:18] edr file hash check passed.
[16:17:18] logfile size: 207899
[16:17:18] Leaving Run
[16:17:18] - Writing 100111707 bytes of core data to disk...
[16:17:23]   ... Done.
[16:17:43] - Shutting down core
[16:17:43] 
[16:17:43] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[16:20:39] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[16:20:39] Unit 9 finished with 35 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[16:20:39] Updated performance fraction: 0.545244
[16:20:39] Sending work to server
[16:20:39] Project: 2681 (Run 3, Clone 3, Gen 89)


[16:20:39] + Attempting to send results [March 21 16:20:39 UTC]
[16:20:39] - Reading file work/wuresults_09.dat from core
[16:20:39]   (Read 100111707 bytes from disk)
[16:20:39] Connecting to http://171.67.108.22:8080/
[16:38:29] Posted data.
[16:38:30] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~91 kB/s
[16:38:30] - Averaged speed for that direction ~77 kB/s
[16:38:30] + Results successfully sent
[16:38:30] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
Edit: Just noticed this is the same WU orion posted was missing from his stats in the other thread I linked to in the first post here. That makes two people who did the same WU and neither one received credit for it.
Horvat
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:07 am
Hardware configuration: Rig1: Asus Z8PE-D12X/Dual Xeon X5675 3.06 Ghz
Rig2: Asus Z8NA-D6/Dual Xeon E5620 2.4 Ghz
Rig3: Asus Z8NA-D6C/Dual Xeon X5670 2.93 Ghz
Rig4: Asus Z8NA-D6C/Dual Xeon E5649 2.53 Ghz

Did not get credit for completed -bigadv

Post by Horvat »

I completed a -bigadv WU dated 3/20 at 4:10pm(that's my local time) that I did not get credit for at all. I checked the configuration and it is correct. It has completed several WU and had the points credited. The log file shows it was completed and results sent successfully but still no points credited. It was WU P2681 R1 C10 G82 sent to server 171.67.108.22 at 20:31:17 on 3/20/2010. I also seem to be having problems getting full credit on the whole for all the WU's I am completing. There is a 70,000 PPD difference between what I am actually getitng credit for and what the monitoring software is reporting. Of course my actual PPD is less than what the monitoring software is showing. I am using HFM.NET. Other than an occasional failed gpu WU all log files are showing successfully completed and transmitted WU's. Some help please? And no excuses will be appreciated.
capreppy
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 3:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel Core i7 @ 3.89 | eVGA X58 | 3x eVGA GTX285SC (760/1742/1385)
AMD PII 940BE @ 3.8 | MSI K9A2 | 3x eVGA 9800GX2 (500/1750/800)
Intel Q6600 @ 3.2 | Gigabyte EP43-UD3L | eVGA 8800GTX

Re: 171.67.108.22 (bigadv) Missing credits?

Post by capreppy »

this is one that was submitted this morning.

Code: Select all

[15:24:53] Completed 249998 out of 249998 steps  (100%)
[15:25:14] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
[15:25:24] 
[15:25:24] Finished Work Unit:
[15:25:24] - Reading up to 26356560 from "work/wudata_05.trr": Read 26356560
[15:25:25] trr file hash check passed.
[15:25:25] - Reading up to 42754328 from "work/wudata_05.xtc": Read 42754328
[15:25:26] xtc file hash check passed.
[15:25:26] edr file hash check passed.
[15:25:26] logfile size: 210044
[15:25:26] Leaving Run
[15:25:31] - Writing 69485588 bytes of core data to disk...
[15:25:46]   ... Done.
[15:26:23] - Shutting down core
[15:26:23] 
[15:26:23] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[15:28:51] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[15:28:51] Unit 5 finished with 53 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[15:28:51] Updated performance fraction: 0.512683
[15:28:51] Sending work to server
[15:28:51] Project: 2681 (Run 4, Clone 1, Gen 81)


[15:28:51] + Attempting to send results [March 20 15:28:51 UTC]
[15:28:51] - Reading file work/wuresults_05.dat from core
[15:28:54]   (Read 69485588 bytes from disk)
[15:28:54] Connecting to http://171.67.108.22:8080/
[15:43:11] Posted data.
[15:43:11] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~57 kB/s
[15:48:39] - Averaged speed for that direction ~66 kB/s
[15:48:39] + Results successfully sent
[15:48:39] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[15:48:39] + Number of Units Completed: 44
Intel Core i7 @ 3.89 | eVGA X58 | 3x eVGA GTX285SC (760/1742/1385)
AMD PII 940BE @ 3.8 | MSI K9A2 | 3x eVGA 9800GX2 (500/1750/800)
Intel Q6600 @ 3.2 | Gigabyte EP43-UD3L | eVGA 8800GTX

Image
orion
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:45 pm
Hardware configuration: 4p/4 MC ES @ 3.0GHz/32GB
4p/4x6128 @ 2.47GHz/32GB
2p/2 IL ES @ 2.7GHz/16GB
1p/8150/8GB
1p/1090T/4GB
Location: neither here nor there

Re: Did not get credit for completed -bigadv

Post by orion »

At least three from my team, including myself have the same problem.

Edit by Mod: Threads Merged.
iustus quia...
Post Reply