Really un-professional

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
*hondo*
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:50 am
Hardware configuration: Geoforce 250 GTS Active for F@H

4 Core Intel not used at all for F@H
Location: England UK

Really un-professional

Post by *hondo* »

After starting a team = 51078 I'm beginning to wonder why I bother, having lost heaven knows how many points through server problems a couple of weeks ago it's getting to be one problem after another.

What happened to not having to baby sit F@H ?

[23:35:09] + Attempting to send results [March 10 23:35:09 UTC]
[23:35:10] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[23:35:10] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[23:35:10] (171.64.65.71:8080)
[23:35:10] + Retrying using alternative port
[23:35:23] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[23:35:23] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[23:35:23] (171.64.65.71:80)
[23:35:23] - Error: Could not transmit unit 05 (completed March 10) to work server.


============================================

[09:40:29] + Attempting to send results [March 11 09:40:29 UTC]
[09:40:31] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[09:40:31] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[09:40:31] (171.64.65.71:8080)
[09:40:31] + Retrying using alternative port
[09:40:32] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[09:40:32] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[09:40:32] (171.64.65.71:80)
[09:40:32] - Error: Could not transmit unit 05 (completed March 10) to work server.
patonb
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:42 am
Hardware configuration: WooHoo= SR-2 -- L5639 @ ?? -- Evga 560ti FPB -- 12Gig Corsair XMS3 -- Corsair 1050hx -- Blackhawk Ultra

Foldie = @3.2Ghz -- Noctua NH-U12 -- BFG GTX 260-216 -- 6Gig OCZ Gold -- x58a-ud3r -- 6Gig OCZ Gold -- hx520

Re: Really un-professional

Post by patonb »

This seems to possibly be your side issue. The client can't send a http out.

Have you recently updated your firewall, or network settings?
WooHoo = L5639 @ 3.3Ghz Evga SR-2 6x2gb Corsair XMS3 CM 212+ Corsair 1050hx Blackhawk Ultra EVGA 560ti

Foldie = i7 950@ 4.0Ghz x58a-ud3r 216-216 @ 850/2000 3x2gb OCZ Gold NH-u12 Heatsink Corsair hx520 Antec 900
HaloJones
Posts: 906
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:16 am

Re: Really un-professional

Post by HaloJones »

That server is "not accepting" at the moment. And I agree, it's a pain. The servers are unacceptably unreliable and this seems to me to be unnecessary. It is utterly normal in commercial environments to have server uptimes measured in years.
single 1070

Image
*hondo*
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:50 am
Hardware configuration: Geoforce 250 GTS Active for F@H

4 Core Intel not used at all for F@H
Location: England UK

Re: Really un-professional

Post by *hondo* »

patonb wrote:This seems to possibly be your side issue. The client can't send a http out.

Have you recently updated your firewall, or network settings?
Nope, I've even tried unsuccessfully running without the firewall.
patonb
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:42 am
Hardware configuration: WooHoo= SR-2 -- L5639 @ ?? -- Evga 560ti FPB -- 12Gig Corsair XMS3 -- Corsair 1050hx -- Blackhawk Ultra

Foldie = @3.2Ghz -- Noctua NH-U12 -- BFG GTX 260-216 -- 6Gig OCZ Gold -- x58a-ud3r -- 6Gig OCZ Gold -- hx520

Re: Really un-professional

Post by patonb »

HaloJones wrote:That server is "not accepting" at the moment. And I agree, it's a pain. The servers are unacceptably unreliable and this seems to me to be unnecessary. It is utterly normal in commercial environments to have server uptimes measured in years.
thing is, he's not getting the initial request sent out.

Hondo...... Is it all the time or every so often?
WooHoo = L5639 @ 3.3Ghz Evga SR-2 6x2gb Corsair XMS3 CM 212+ Corsair 1050hx Blackhawk Ultra EVGA 560ti

Foldie = i7 950@ 4.0Ghz x58a-ud3r 216-216 @ 850/2000 3x2gb OCZ Gold NH-u12 Heatsink Corsair hx520 Antec 900
*hondo*
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:50 am
Hardware configuration: Geoforce 250 GTS Active for F@H

4 Core Intel not used at all for F@H
Location: England UK

Re: Really un-professional

Post by *hondo* »

Hi patonb :) I'm not sure I know what you mean sori. it's not now happening with all WUs just the odd one. What freaks me out I'd got stacks queued a couple of weeks ago, I then did think the problem was my end & went for a full re-install & obviously therefore lost the lot.

Thanx for the reply :)

----------------------------------------

TBH It's beginning to seem to me like someone just isn't taking ownership for these ongoing problems
pluto7777
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:20 am

Re: Really un-professional

Post by pluto7777 »

Yes it seems to be an ongoing problem. The last four or five months have been truly horrible for smp folding. I can understand if they ran out of units but seeing them fail to transmit is irritating. It wouldn't be so bad if it didn't grind all other Internet activity to a halt.
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Really un-professional

Post by Grandpa_01 »

pluto7777 wrote:Yes it seems to be an ongoing problem. The last four or five months have been truly horrible for smp folding. I can understand if they ran out of units but seeing them fail to transmit is irritating. It wouldn't be so bad if it didn't grind all other Internet activity to a halt.

Just curious but what is happening that is grinding your Internet activity to a halt. What kind of connection do you have?
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
pluto7777
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:20 am

Re: Really un-professional

Post by pluto7777 »

Grandpa_01 wrote:Just curious but what is happening that is grinding your Internet activity to a halt. What kind of connection do you have?
Road Runner cable. According to speedtest.net upload speed is .30mbps which I'm sure is poor. Since ~Nov 09 I usually have one to three finished work units rechecking the work server at any given time.
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: Really un-professional

Post by P5-133XL »

Grandpa_01 wrote:Just curious but what is happening that is grinding your Internet activity to a halt. What kind of connection do you have?
That behavior has always been a problem with folding. I can remember asking for a BW limiter feature added to the uniprocessor client when there was only just the uniprocessor client. The discussion at the time indicated that slowing things down couldn't be done for fear that the number of open sessions would overwhelm the databases. When folding gets or sends data to and from the servers it uses as much of the BW it can and that has nothing to do with the type of connection or the provider. The normal solution, if it is an actual problem (like for real time gaming) for an individual has been to install with QOS either via router or software.
Image
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Really un-professional

Post by bruce »

Is this discussion still on topic? I don't understand how several of the recent questions can be classified as "Really un-professional"

How about starting a new topic when you have an issue that you'd like help with?
Post Reply