May I use Fah logo???

[cpu-rip.com]

Hi,
I would like to use few folding@home logos on my web,
and use (edit-recompose) logo to create my own logo (banner).
Am I alowed to do that?
thanks

namely:
fah logo from client folder
stanford university logo from client folder (no editing - compsing)
big protein logo from download page

[7im]

I don't know for sure, but it might help them forumlate an answer if they knew how your web page would be used.

[cpu-rip.com]

thanks for reply

web is about personal museum of processor take a look se prepare for intel 286 monster PPD attack !
But seriously, we have growing comunity so we are folding.
I hope, there is no problem with logo, every biger web is using fah logo. (f.e. evga ?)

[bruce]

web is about personal museum of processor take a look se prepare for intel 286 monster PPD attack !

Sorry, but a 286 cannot fold unless you also have a 287 installed.

[cpu-rip.com]

oh sure, so i pick mighty C80287XL hmm or CYRIX 82S87-NP-SV....so new thread - which one has best PPD

so what about my main question please ?

[bruce]

so what about my main question please ?

Sorry . . . I was still searching for the answer. I knew the topic had come up before but I didn't remember where.
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=5321&p=53248#p53248

[cpu-rip.com]

I am able to minimize my needs, so I would use only red protein logo from download page, this logo is used everywhere publicly on internet
so may I too?

[VijayPande]

The Stanford and Folding@home logos are copyright of Stanford University, so they can't be used w/o permission (and it's a complex legal situation to get permission -- I am not authorized to grant permission). If you make your own logo, I don't see any conflict, although you should make it clear that you are not affiliated with Stanford University.

[cpu-rip.com]

That is a pity.
OK we will try to rig up own logo.
Thanks for final clearing word

[whynot]

I wouldn't say "pity". It's unsurprising. In fact, what we need is a work-around. Is it possible to provide crunchers with an image they could use for "<img>" element? (look, placing buttons around is usual behaviour these days.)