Search found 362 matches
- Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:53 am
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: quick question re: GTX 690
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5515
Re: quick question re: GTX 690
As I said, 1096 is already in there, which you could have looked up yourself, originally, instead of afterwards. If you want the typo fixed, ask one of the mods to open a ticket for you. But it already folds as is... Tell you what - you tell me which line you find "C2075" and I'll go look...
- Fri Jan 11, 2013 4:46 am
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: quick question re: GTX 690
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5515
Re: quick question re: GTX 690
Already in there. 0x10de:0x1096:2:2:GF110 [Tesla M2075 Dual-Slot Computing Processor Module] C/M are considered the same thing. Then why would they have two listings for C2070/M2070 if they're the same thing? And if they ARE the same thing, then shouldn't they have ONE PCI devID? ;) Think about it....
- Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:02 pm
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: quick question re: GTX 690
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5515
Re: quick question re: GTX 690
The problem is that I don't have the Tesla C2075 yet. So it's kind of hard to add the PCI device info without it (unless that info's posted elsewhere on the net - which I haven't checked yet). It's up for debate right now for acquisition (because I CAN run SOME FEA on the same card), but I probably ...
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 10:50 am
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: quick question re: GTX 690
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5515
Re: quick question re: GTX 690
That thread is locked. What'st he URL for the ticket submission/management system?
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:14 am
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: quick question re: GTX 690
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5515
Re: quick question re: GTX 690
Hmmm...good to know.
What's the process required to add a GPU to the GPU.txt file? (Tesla C2075/K10 isn't listed in there, but M2075 is listed twice).
What's the process required to add a GPU to the GPU.txt file? (Tesla C2075/K10 isn't listed in there, but M2075 is listed twice).
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:04 am
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: quick question re: GTX 690
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5515
Re: quick question re: GTX 690
Is F@H single or double precision FP?
- Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:49 pm
- Forum: New GPUs (whitelist)
- Topic: quick question re: GTX 690
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5515
quick question re: GTX 690
Since that's considered a dual GPU card, does that mean that two clients are required to engage both GPUs or will one suffice?
Thanks. (Tried looking for info about that on here and it doesn't really say).
Thanks. (Tried looking for info about that on here and it doesn't really say).
- Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:54 pm
- Forum: Scientific discussions (Non-FAH)
- Topic: I'm kinda back...again.
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1347
I'm kinda back...again.
It appears that the F@H forums were being bot-attacked, so it didn't really seem to matter how complex I made the password. After multiple attempts, my account would get locked out anyways. But in any case, my account seems to be mine...once again. Latest news. Not much. Nothing running F@H yet. 27 ...
- Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:30 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: best ppd i can expect ??
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2942
Re: best ppd i can expect ??
Has anyone ever tried to run the GPU client within a VM in a Linux host/Windows guest?
- Thu Jun 11, 2009 4:12 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2671 (Run 3, Clone 82, Gen 42) WMCNBS 100% reprod.
- Replies: 25
- Views: 2892
Re: Project: 2671 (Run 3, Clone 82, Gen 42) seg fault
No matter how many times I restart the client, I get the same error.
Deleted queue.dat to move the client along.
Deleted queue.dat to move the client along.
- Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:55 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2671 (Run 3, Clone 82, Gen 42) WMCNBS 100% reprod.
- Replies: 25
- Views: 2892
Project: 2671 (Run 3, Clone 82, Gen 42) seg fault
seg fault on a different comp; dual AMD Opteron 2220 on Tyan S2915WA2NRF. log: [01:12:34] [01:12:34] *------------------------------* [01:12:34] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core [01:12:34] Version 2.07 (Sun Apr 19 14:51:09 PDT 2009) [01:12:34] [01:12:34] Preparing to commence simulation [01:12:34] - En...
- Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:11 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2671 (Run 43, Clone 46, Gen 43) seg fault
- Replies: 2
- Views: 581
Re: Project: 2671 (Run 43, Clone 46, Gen 43) seg fault
WU completed on second attempt.susato wrote:Let us know how it turns out - Thanks.
Code: Select all
[23:41:55] Project: 2671 (Run 43, Clone 46, Gen 43)
[23:41:55] + Attempting to send results [June 7 23:41:55 UTC]
- Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:09 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2676 (Run 3, Clone 134, Gen 157) error
- Replies: 2
- Views: 703
Re: Project: 2676 (Run 3, Clone 134, Gen 157) error
Thanks "Al" - I trust this WU finished properly the second time through? At your < 5 minute frame time it should have finished off several hours ago. Please let us know if it failed again. Yes, it appears that the WU finished successfully on the second try. [08:20:22] Project: 2676 (Run 3...
- Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:09 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2671 (Run 43, Clone 46, Gen 43) seg fault
- Replies: 2
- Views: 581
Project: 2671 (Run 43, Clone 46, Gen 43) seg fault
log: [16:09:04] [16:09:04] *------------------------------* [16:09:04] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core [16:09:04] Version 2.07 (Sun Apr 19 14:51:09 PDT 2009) [16:09:04] [16:09:04] Preparing to commence simulation [16:09:04] - Ensuring status. Please wait. [16:09:05] Called DecompressByteArray: compres...
- Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:51 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2676 (Run 3, Clone 134, Gen 157) error
- Replies: 2
- Views: 703
Project: 2676 (Run 3, Clone 134, Gen 157) error
log: [23:40:59] [23:40:59] *------------------------------* [23:40:59] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core [23:40:59] Version 2.07 (Sun Apr 19 14:51:09 PDT 2009) [23:40:59] [23:40:59] Preparing to commence simulation [23:40:59] - Ensuring status. Please wait. [23:41:00] Called DecompressByteArray: compres...