Search found 19 matches
- Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:47 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 5767 Multiple run clone gen's
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1016
Re: Project 5767 Multiple run clone gen's
EUE on Project: 5768 (Run 8, Clone 9, Gen 9) running Vista32, 181.00 drivers, 8800 GTS (G92) 512mb (very stable). [00:38:40] *------------------------------* [00:38:40] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta [00:38:40] Version 1.19 (Mon Nov 3 09:34:13 PST 2008) [00:38:40] [00:38:40] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 3...
- Wed Dec 24, 2008 9:59 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 5767 Multiple run clone gen's
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1016
Re: Project 5767 Multiple run clone gen's
Just had this on Vista64 with 181.00 drivers GTX 260. [21:27:39] [21:27:39] *------------------------------* [21:27:39] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta [21:27:39] Version 1.19 (Mon Nov 3 09:34:13 PST 2008) [21:27:39] [21:27:39] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.507...
- Wed Dec 24, 2008 4:21 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 5767 Multiple run clone gen's
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1016
Re: Project 5767 Multiple run clone gen's
After the error, GPU2 client just stops so I exit and delete the log's and que files and restart it to get it running again. So atm I dont have the others. The next batch I get I'll copy up to the forum. So far this last error was on Vista32, 178.24 drivers, 8800 GTS (G92) 512mb that has folded over...
- Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:18 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.25 Server has no record?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1377
Re: 171.67.108.25 Server has no record?
I know what it means: More Stanford Server Problems!toTOW wrote:Fahwiki entry about this error : http://fahwiki.net/index.php/Common_Err ... _this_unit
We have just about had our fill of them lately. I'm thinking they need to put an end to these problems or continue to loose doners.
- Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:51 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.25 Server has no record?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1377
171.67.108.25 Server has no record?
Give me a break! We starting this load of BS again? [02:44:27] Connecting to http://171.67.108.25:8080/ [02:44:27] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server [02:44:27] (Got status 503) [02:44:27] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) [02:44:27] (171.67.108.25:8080) [02:44:27] + Retrying using al...
- Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:14 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.25 - cannot upload work unit
- Replies: 22
- Views: 8149
Re: 171.67.108.25 - cannot upload work unit
Lots of work to turn in. Anyone looking into this or are we on our own again?
- Mon Oct 27, 2008 5:32 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Server 171.67.108.25:8080 503 errors
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5002
Re: Server 171.67.108.25:8080 503 errors
Still can't upload to this server. Please fix...
- Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:52 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.20 in Reject
- Replies: 54
- Views: 11795
Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject
Good decision on the thread anko1, I really couldn't bear to relive the nightmare of the previous like thread.
...and yes it's still down.
...and yes it's still down.
- Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:48 pm
- Forum: Issues with this forum
- Topic: Trouble makers upsetting Forum
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2375
Re: Trouble makers upsetting Forum
Thank you Roger for that post and and I thank you for your encouragement for others to play nice. If I may - I did not intend to call out an individual nor am I saying that there should not be any healthy disagreement among subscribers. As for sdack I do appreciate most of his comments and idea's bu...
- Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:08 pm
- Forum: Issues with this forum
- Topic: Trouble makers upsetting Forum
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2375
Trouble makers upsetting Forum
Is there nothing to be done with trouble makers that are upsetting a large majority of the forum's subscribers? Whole threads on specific topics are being derailed by arguing by users like sdack. I would think that if it is apparent the a subscriber is intentionally derailing threads and upsetting o...
- Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:43 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT
- Replies: 112
- Views: 25038
Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT
Still getting sent to that server and not getting work...
- Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:34 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: No Credit for 2665 (Run 2, Clone 612, Gen 51)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1057
Re: No Credit for 2665 (Run 2, Clone 612, Gen 51)
Thanks. That was I'm sure what happend. I'll have to watch for that in the future.
Thanks again for the help.
Thanks again for the help.
- Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:58 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: No Credit for 2665 (Run 2, Clone 612, Gen 51)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1057
Re: No Credit for 2665 (Run 2, Clone 612, Gen 51)
I see..Ok then. Would you say this was just fluke (getting the wu again when I sent in the partial yesterday)? Is there something I can do to minimize this in the future? I usually dont have problems with getting the (deleteing wu) but I forgot to make a back up before shutting down the SMP yesterda...
- Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:44 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: No Credit for 2665 (Run 2, Clone 612, Gen 51)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1057
Re: No Credit for 2665 (Run 2, Clone 612, Gen 51)
Don't understand why it says that I sent it in again (today) with 0 complete when I have monitored the unit all day and it did complete and was sent in with 100% done.
I watched it get sent in and my log clearly states that it did go in 100% complete.
I watched it get sent in and my log clearly states that it did go in 100% complete.
- Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:40 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: No Credit for 2665 (Run 2, Clone 612, Gen 51)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1057
Re: No Credit for 2665 (Run 2, Clone 612, Gen 51)
I checked the log further back and you are right that I did send in that unit partially completed due to: [15:12:05] Folding@home Core Shutdown: MISSING_WORK_FILES [15:12:05] Finalizing output [15:12:08] CoreStatus = 1 (1) [15:12:08] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0x1 [15:12:08] Deleting cu...