Search found 20 matches
- Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:45 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: problem with 6099, run 0, clone 46, gen 82
- Replies: 3
- Views: 653
Re: problem with 6099, run 0, clone 46, gen 82
step 41000000: Water molecule starting at atom 93408 can not be settled. Check for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep if appropriate. [14:16:34] CoreStatus = 0 (0) This is what I got the first time I downloaded this unit and I tried it again just to be sure it wasn't something in the transmissi...
- Fri Nov 18, 2011 8:37 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 128.143.199.97/ Reject Status [Some WUs MIA]
- Replies: 35
- Views: 7204
Re: 128.143.199.97:8080/ Reject Status [resolving]
Sorry for the delay, but I've been busy upgrading Fedora to F16 and folding (additional 14 since this began). Parallel run - timing based on wallclock. NODE (s) Real (s) (%) Time: 35576.400 35576.400 100.0 9h52:56 (Mnbf/s) (GFlops) (ns/day) (hour/ns) Performance: 345.542 17.778 4.857 4.941 Thanx for...
- Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:46 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Bonus Points Allocation Please
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1225
Re: Bonus Points Allocation Please
I finished 6012/2/150/20 yesterday at 01:04:40 UTC and started another project 6012/1/36/21 four minutes later. I received 2301 points for the first one, and 470 points for the second one. My passkey was found at the start of the second one. It took 11 hours and 45 minutes to complete the second one...
- Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:07 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 3064 (Run 2, Clone 362, Gen 32) Segmentation fault
- Replies: 1
- Views: 381
Project: 3064 (Run 2, Clone 362, Gen 32) Segmentation fault
This is the second time I have received this exact project. It failed the second time just as it did the first time. Obviously, if I receive it again, I will just eliminate it. [01:49:51] Completed 4900000 out of 5000000 steps (98 percent) [01:53:30] Warning: long 1-4 interactions [01:53:30] [01:53:...
- Tue Nov 24, 2009 12:56 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Is it just me or are the Stats not updating?[Nov 12 problem]
- Replies: 175
- Views: 50489
Re: Is it just me or are the Stats not updating?
Progress is definitely being made. I stopped folding 4 days ago when I had completed, by my log, 2906 and as of last night I was still at 2899. This morning @ 6:48 am Chicago time I am at 2902. I guess I can start folding again. If I don't get the other four I won't be too unhappy. Computers do mess...
- Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:17 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1924
Re: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
I believe the complaint would be relating to the extremely high failure rate of the 2665 class WU's, whether under VM or SMP folding. They are very problematic and will even crash a system. I have less than 15% success with these on 3 different machines. Sometimes it just feels good to complain abo...
- Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:10 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1924
Re: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
I agree, WUs that fail, whatever the core version, are a waste of resources in some regard. But a few bad WUs are always expected with any core type. Part of the game. On the bright side, you probably moved on to some A2 work units after these A1s failed, and you're machines are back to using 100% ...
- Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:10 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1924
Re: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
Nothing fah related is a waste of computer time. A1's came first, and still need to be completed to finish the scientific work. A2s are an improvement. Instead of bashing A1s for going slower, you should, IMO, be thanking the project for making improvements in the A2 to better use your computing re...
- Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:58 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1924
Re: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
The A1 core really sucks. :shock: After spending 1 day 0 hours 39 minutes and 17 seconds on one 2665 unit and 21 hours 57 minutes 52 seconds on the other, both of them aborted in writing the file to disk. [12:38:17] Leaving Run [12:38:21] - Writing 22081679 bytes of core data to disk... [12:38:21] ....
- Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:48 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1924
Re: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
Thanks for your advice on doing a search. I did search and didn't find anything that confirmed the poor performance of the A1 core in a manner similar to what I find on my machines. The A1 core really sucks.toTOW wrote:Search on the forum ... it's a normal behavior for the A1 core.
- Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:06 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: 2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1924
2665 units drastically underutilizing my cpu's
I have two AMD 4-core processors running @ 2.9 and 3.2 Ghz. When they are processing 2671 and 2677 units they are close to 100% usage on all four cores. Under FAHcore_a1 with a project 2665 unit they have one core at 20-30%, one near 50%, one in the 70% range and one near 90+%. The performance on th...
- Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:46 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 785 run 28 clone 2 gen 2
- Replies: 4
- Views: 644
Re: Project 785 run 28 clone 2 gen 2
Both units were returned on the 29th and both got credit. They were downloaded on 26 Jan @ 23:30 and 23:33 UTC. Guess I was worried about nothing.
- Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:54 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 785 run 28 clone 2 gen 2
- Replies: 4
- Views: 644
Project 785 run 28 clone 2 gen 2
I just downloaded this project to one of my computers and then three minutes later I received the same project/run/clone/gen on the same computer but in a different directory with a different user id and a different machine id. The computer is a four core processor running Linux Fedora 10. If I comp...
- Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:05 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: 1st WU, no credit - P2620 (R76, C13, G33) [CS 171.64.122.76]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1128
Re: 1st WU, no credit - Project: 2620 (Run 76, Clone 13, Gen 33)
I have a similar problem concerning a 2620 WU. It is Project 2620 Run 21 Clone 10 Gen 36. It was returned, but the fahlog does not show which server received it. I would love to know if it was actually received and if I will get credit. I can show the part of the log that records the successful tran...
- Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:16 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: WU 4513, 4514
- Replies: 20
- Views: 5948
Re: WU 4513, 4514
I found a reference to bigpackets=big in the wiki and that is what is in my client.cfg . I will look up the BigWU parameter. bigpackets=big is what Folders call BigWU. They the same critter. If your faster computer has this in its client.cfg, you're good. Do note that BigWU is an indication that yo...