155.247.166.219 rejecting

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Nekolepsy
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:50 pm

155.247.166.219 rejecting

Post by Nekolepsy »

155.247.166.219 has been rejecting connections since earlier today. All but two of my nodes configured with >24 cpus have stopped folding. Somehow those two got assigned to 134.139.52.2 and 134.139.52.3 which I don't even see on the server status list. Do I just have to reconfigure my big nodes to use be cpus=24 every time this occurs now or is there another solution?
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: 155.247.166.219 rejecting

Post by bruce »

I'll notify those who can fix 155.247.166.219

FAH's projects vary in size and some cannot fully utilize 24 CPUs without crashing. If you're using th released FAHClient v7.4.4, it will ONLY accept projects that meet your request for using 24 cores. If you're using the beta v7.4.15 or .16 it will negotiate with the servers and find the largest project that's available that uses <=24 rather than remaining idle.

Both servers 134.139.52.2 and 134.139.52.3 are on-line at csulb.edu. They're shown in the beta version of serverstat.html ... which hopefully will soon replace the public version.

If you posted your log, we could probably help you better.
Nekolepsy
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:50 pm

Re: 155.247.166.219 rejecting

Post by Nekolepsy »

Thanks for the tip about the beta version, Bruce. I'll give that a try.
fluke76
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:33 am

Re: 155.247.166.219 rejecting

Post by fluke76 »

Looks like 155.247.166.219 started accepting requests yesterday afternoon. I am able to get work units and upload them without errors. However, it appears that am not getting credit for those completed work units. It looks like I have completed about 17 WUs since the server came back online, but have not received any credit for them.

Should I create a new post for this, or is this related to the server rejecting from yesterday?

Thanks!
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: 155.247.166.219 rejecting

Post by bruce »

I've notified the stats team of the problem.
fluke76
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:33 am

Re: 155.247.166.219 rejecting

Post by fluke76 »

bruce wrote:I've notified the stats team of the problem.
Thanks Bruce!
DrBB1
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:30 am
Location: SE PA

Re: 155.247.166.219 rejecting

Post by DrBB1 »

I completed one to this server and the points had been posted when I checked at 1PM (EST) today (about 6 hours ago). Anyone having a problem getting credit since then?
========
DrBB1
fluke76
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:33 am

Re: 155.247.166.219 rejecting

Post by fluke76 »

DrBB1 wrote:I completed one to this server and the points had been posted when I checked at 1PM (EST) today (about 6 hours ago). Anyone having a problem getting credit since then?
I just went through my logs and I have not received credit for 21 WUs that were uploaded between 12/19/17 @ 21:36:05 and 12/21/17 @ 00:26:19.

And I just realized what happened. Someone had commented above about trying out the Beta client, which ended up crashing on my computer. So I uninstalled it and re-installed the stable client. When I reinstalled, I forgot to put my username in. STUPID me!!
DrBB1
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:30 am
Location: SE PA

Re: 155.247.166.219 rejecting

Post by DrBB1 »

fluke76 wrote:And I just realized what happened. Someone had commented above about trying out the Beta client, which ended up crashing on my computer. So I uninstalled it and re-installed the stable client. When I reinstalled, I forgot to put my username in. STUPID me!!
Join the crowd.... :ewink:
========
DrBB1
Post Reply