Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
It does not make suggestions, but it will tell you if the current clocks are working or show an error if not. Raise the clocks until it fails. That will give you an idea of what the real client and work units will handle. Ymmv.alicea wrote:I've seen Windows more than 10 years ago for the last time. There's no problem to compile the application myself, you mean this one https://github.com/pandegroup/fahbench?
But... benchmarks usually only measure the computation power, does this one suggest best clocks settings, too?
Yeah, Im trying this way, but without errors shown, the GPU freezes after several hours7im wrote:but it will tell you if the current clocks are working or show an error if not. Raise the clocks until it fails. That will give you an idea of what the real client and work units will handle. Ymmv.
for example yesterday evening I've set 750,1100 and it worked perfectly until today 9:30 morning. Now I've lowered to 700,1100 and is working without any problems for over 12hrs.And that's why there's not much sense to manipulate with memory, but rather with core, isn't it?bruce wrote:Normally, the FahCore does adjust memory clock down during computation (saving thermal headroom) and up when it's primarily moving data between RAM and VRAM does mean that Stanford has done some performance tradeoffs.