Question about points - actual and est

If you're new to FAH and need help getting started or you have very basic questions, start here.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
crodgers
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:35 pm

Question about points - actual and est

Post by crodgers »

I am running a CPU wu (PRCG 8582 (0,3,91) ). In the Advanced Console while running on Medium (7/8 cores), I see the following information:
Base Credit: 1665
Estimated Credit: 11709
Estimated PPD: 15358
Estimates TPF: 10 mins 58 secs

If I push the slider up to Full (8/8 cores), I see:
Base Credit: 1665
Estimated Credit: 11669
Estimated PPD: 15304
Estimates TPF: 10 mins 58 secs

Why did my Estimated Credit and Estimated PPD drop when I added the 8th core?
AMD FX 8320 8-core 3.5, 8GB, Nvidia GeForce GT 620, Win7-Ult-64
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Question about points - actual and est

Post by bruce »

All estimates depend on running at a uniform speed for several frames -- long enough to stabilize performance. Do not trust any estimate unless your system has been running at the selected settings for a while. The estimates grow more accurate when the system is left undisturbed.

When you change the slider, the analysis is stopped briefly and restarted with the new settings so immediately there's an interruption in progress during the restart process.
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7937
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: Question about points - actual and est

Post by Joe_H »

It can take a frame or two before the estimated figures will settle down and factor in the change as well as the pause and restart used to change the number of cores assigned. In addition WU's from some projects are known to not get consistent estimates from the client. The figures are only estimates, not instantaneously correct numbers.

If you want to get more exact figures you need to examine the log over several frames to get an average TPF. There are a number of bonus point calculators you can then use to get a more reliable figure for PPD based on that TPF.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: Question about points - actual and est

Post by P5-133XL »

In addition to the above, when you add the last CPU core you eliminate any spare CPU capability for your own use. That means that any non-folding CPU usage will now causes a folding thread to suspend and because of the synchronized nature of the SMP cores the other folding threads just sit in an idle-loop waiting for the suspended thread to come back. The end result is that even small amounts of non-folding CPU usage can cause significant drops in TPF, PPD, and estimated credit that were not likely with a surplus CPU core available for the non-folding CPU usage.

My point is that adding a CPU core to folding is not inherently beneficial. Your mileage may vary depending upon your own personal computer usage and that is in addition to the above 3-frame median-average calculations that the client does to estimate those numbers
Image
crodgers
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:35 pm

Re: Question about points - actual and est

Post by crodgers »

Thanks for the insight.

So I recently switched teams. I have completed over 1700 wus on my old team, but I am brand new to my new team. I started fresh with a new PC, new install of v7, etc, just a couple of days ago. When I installed v7, I also set up the passkey into my client. Someone mentioned that you will not receive bonus until you have at least 10 WUs and maintain 80% completion rate. So, when you switch teams, it starts you back at 0, right? So it is a min requirement per user/team pair? Then I will really get 11,000 points instead of 1,600 points for this wu in the future? That is a huge multiplier just for having passkey... or a huge hit for switching teams...
AMD FX 8320 8-core 3.5, 8GB, Nvidia GeForce GT 620, Win7-Ult-64
bollix47
Posts: 2958
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: Question about points - actual and est

Post by bollix47 »

As long as the user name and passkey combination are qualified for QRB it should not matter what team # you are using. You should still get your bonus.

Your statistics show only 7 work units completed so far with your user name and passkey combination:

http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=641697

It would appear that your 1774 work units done for your previous team were processed before the passkey requirement existed and have no effect on your current QRB qualification.

Keep in mind that core_15 GPU work units do not receive a bonus and do not count towards the 10 work units needed to qualify your passkey. Also, any work units using the a4 core are currently receiving a 10% bonus regardless of QRB status.
crodgers
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:35 pm

Re: Question about points - actual and est

Post by crodgers »

good to know, thanks. So the 10 minimum is 10 new ones under the passkey system. I did have a GPU wu for something like +3000 points. If that does not count, then I am only at 6 wu's for bonus. I just finished another one for 1600+ points. If I keep getting those, then it will be 4 more days until I fulfill the bonus requirement. I think i did notice the 10% on some smaller WUs.
AMD FX 8320 8-core 3.5, 8GB, Nvidia GeForce GT 620, Win7-Ult-64
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Question about points - actual and est

Post by PantherX »

The bonus applies to the Projects using the following FahCore:
CPU -> FahCore_a3, FahCore_a4, FahCore_a5
GPU -> FahCore_17

Completing WUs from those Project will count towards your 10 WUs requirement.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
crodgers
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:35 pm

Re: Question about points - actual and est

Post by crodgers »

Thanks! The GPU i did must have been FahCore_17, because I started receiving bonus points on my 11th WU. The GPU was a bit too much heat for my room, so I shut it down after the first WU. But running 7/8 CPU cores is now getting me about 11,000 PPD. I am now up to page 6 of my team and in the top 10% of the FaH project.
AMD FX 8320 8-core 3.5, 8GB, Nvidia GeForce GT 620, Win7-Ult-64
Post Reply