Stanford and patents. [URL]

Please confine these topics to things that would be of general interest to those who are interested in FAH which don't fall into any other category.

Moderator: Site Moderators

Post Reply
csvanefalk
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 10:28 am

Re: Stanford and patents. [URL]

Post by csvanefalk »

While I understand that patents could (and probably do) contribute to driving innovation in these fields, it is still disgusting that they can be granted in such a way that they effectively make it more expensive to address crucial human needs.

Further, I don't really see what this has to do with F@H, apart from the fact that some researchers from Stanford are involved. They do not seem to be in any way related to either F@H or the Pande group, and it simply would not be fair to assume (which this post implicitly does) that the Pande group would use data from F@H to win patents for their own profit.
Napoleon
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland

Re: Stanford and patents. [URL]

Post by Napoleon »

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/02/04/15/ ... s-swinging tells you all you need to know about patenting schtuff...
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: Stanford and patents. [URL]

Post by P5-133XL »

Napoleon wrote:http://yro.slashdot.org/story/02/04/15/ ... s-swinging tells you all you need to know about patenting schtuff...
Really, Is that all you need to know? It is only patent pending NOT an actual granted patent. All that means is that someone has applied for a patent. Anyone can apply for anything and until granted or denied it is has patent pending status...
Image
Napoleon
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland

Re: Stanford and patents. [URL]

Post by Napoleon »

Oh, the URL was ...patent-granted..., I didn't investigate any further than that. I've been under the impression that it is a true classic, actually a granted patent somewhere in the world, although probably not in the US. Anyhow, no, it really isn't all you should know or worry about patents, just my misguided attempt at humour.

Anyway, the amazing thing is how far that application actually got. Common sense suggests that such thing should've been laughed off and dismissed right away. I don't have much experience about patents, but I do have my name on one such document. That was a long time ago, but patenting business seemed weird and mysterious to me even then.

Oh well, at least it had corporate backing and I was able to squeeze a tiny (NOT tidy) sum of money out of that experience. Even a granted patent is just for bragging rights unless you can prove an infringement and sue.
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
Post Reply