project:10503 run:308 clone:0 gen:594

[MtM]

Not sure where to post this, as the wu did not fail but something strange did take place as the server responded WORK_QUIT as I did not complete the unit.

Code: Select all

23:18:20:Unit 24:Completed 100%
23:18:22:Unit 24:Successful run
23:18:22:Unit 24:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
23:18:32:Unit 24:Reserved 108896 bytes for xtc file; Cosm status=0
23:18:32:Unit 24:Allocated 108896 bytes for xtc file
23:18:32:Unit 24:- Reading up to 108896 from "24/wudata_01.xtc": Read 108896
23:18:32:Unit 24:Read 108896 bytes from xtc file; available packet space=786321568
23:18:32:Unit 24:xtc file hash check passed.
23:18:32:Unit 24:Reserved 21912 21912 786321568 bytes for arc file=<24/wudata_01.trr> Cosm status=0
23:18:32:Unit 24:Allocated 21912 bytes for arc file
23:18:32:Unit 24:- Reading up to 21912 from "24/wudata_01.trr": Read 21912
23:18:32:Unit 24:Read 21912 bytes from arc file; available packet space=786299656
23:18:32:Unit 24:trr file hash check passed.
23:18:32:Unit 24:Allocated 560 bytes for edr file
23:18:32:Unit 24:Read bedfile
23:18:32:Unit 24:edr file hash check passed.
23:18:32:Unit 24:Logfile not read.
23:18:32:Unit 24:GuardedRun: success in DynamicWrapper
23:18:32:Unit 24:GuardedRun: done
23:18:32:Unit 24:Run: GuardedRun completed.
23:18:35:Unit 24:+ Opened results file
23:18:35:Unit 24:- Writing 131880 bytes of core data to disk...
23:18:35:Unit 24:Done: 131368 -> 130355 (compressed to 99.2 percent)
23:18:35:Unit 24:  ... Done.
23:18:35:Unit 24:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=24/wudata_01.ckp
23:18:35:Unit 24:Shutting down core 
23:18:35:Unit 24:
23:18:35:Unit 24:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
23:18:35:FahCore, running Unit 24, returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100)
23:18:36:Sending unit results: id:24 state:SEND project:10503 run:308 clone:0 gen:594 core:0x11 unit:0x000005de6652eda54b716c1e00007859
23:18:36:Unit 24: Uploading 127.80KiB
23:18:36:Starting Unit 23
23:18:36:Connecting to 171.67.108.21:8080
23:18:36:Running core: C:/Users/Marvin/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/x86/NVIDIA/G80/Core_11.fah/FahCore_11.exe -dir 23 -suffix 01 -lifeline 4788 -version 701 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 0
23:18:36:Started core on PID 5856
23:18:36:FahCore 0x11 started
23:18:36:Unit 23:
23:18:36:Unit 23:*------------------------------*
23:18:36:Unit 23:Folding@Home GPU Core
23:18:36:Unit 23:Version 1.31 (Tue Sep 15 10:57:42 PDT 2009)
23:18:37:Unit 23:
23:18:37:Unit 23:Compiler  : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86 
23:18:37:Unit 23:Build host: amoeba
23:18:37:Unit 23:Board Type: Nvidia
23:18:37:Unit 23:Core      : 
23:18:37:Unit 23:Preparing to commence simulation
23:18:37:Unit 23:- Looking at optimizations...
23:18:37:Unit 23:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=23/wudata_01.ckp
23:18:37:Unit 23:- Created dyn
23:18:37:Unit 23:- Files status OK
23:18:37:Unit 23:- Expanded 73832 -> 383588 (decompressed 519.5 percent)
23:18:37:Unit 23:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=73832 data_size=383588, decompressed_data_size=383588 diff=0
23:18:37:Unit 23:- Digital signature verified
23:18:37:Unit 23:
23:18:37:Unit 23:Project: 6600 (Run 9, Clone 48, Gen 416)
23:18:37:Unit 23:
23:18:37:Unit 23:Assembly optimizations on if available.
23:18:37:Unit 23:Entering M.D.
23:18:40:Unit 24: Upload complete
23:18:40:Server responded WORK_QUIT (404)
23:18:40:WARNING: Server did not like results, dumping
23:18:40:Cleaning up Unit 24

Computation went to 100%, I don't need the credit but I want to know what happened to cause the server to reject the upload with this message?

[Jorge1950]

Two possible situations lead to this result:

1.Accelerated too processor and produces errors.
2.Distinctly have on the "Phisic", this sometimes causes errors in the processor.

They are generally small errors; undetected; to be analyzed it becomes the unit of work is rejected.

[7im]

Expired work unit can cause this error message.

Server responded WORK_QUIT (404)
WARNING: Server did not like results, dumping

[MtM]

I don't think it expired ->



Also, shouldn't V7 by default dump units which are past their deadline? ( edit: not withstanding the fact that this unit had not expired )

[bruce]

I don't think it expired ->



Also, shouldn't V7 by default dump units which are past their deadline? ( edit: not withstanding the fact that this unit had not expired )

SHOULD? Yes, but we're still in beta.

There are/were still open tickets associated with 7.1.24 on that topic.

[7im]

IMO, an expired deadline was the most likely cause, based on the limited information in the opening post. Other things "can" cause this error as well. If and when there is more information to evaluate, another likely cause might become apparent.

[MtM]

The additional 'data' you seek was given ->

viewtopic.php?p=194142#p194142

It was quoted even in the subsequent post ->

viewtopic.php?p=194161#p194161

And if you need anything else, all you need to do is be more specific so the information can be provided.

That is if the information you seek is something which is logged.