Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0): Incorrect Points?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
DrBB1
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:30 am
Location: SE PA

Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0): Incorrect Points?

Post by DrBB1 »

I have only recently been getting bonus points (win 6.23 CPU client), so I don't know if points were awarded correctly for completion of this WU. I did receive the nominal 600 points allocated to the WU, but my monitoring app (HFM.NET) suggested that it should have been 1906 points. I have included the log file for that WU below. I simply don't know enough about bonus points to know if the points were correctly credited or not. If not, let me know if the point allocation will be updated; if the points were correctly allocated, I'd appreciate a short explanation of why no bonus was awarded so I will know for the future. Thanks in advance.

Code: Select all

[03:04:26] + Processing work unit
[03:04:26] Core required: FahCore_a4.exe
[03:04:26] Core found.
[03:04:26] Working on queue slot 00 [June 30 03:04:26 UTC]
[03:04:26] + Working ...
[03:04:26] - Calling '.\FahCore_a4.exe -dir work/ -suffix 00 -priority 96 -nocpulock -checkpoint 21 -verbose -lifeline 5484 -version 623'

[03:04:26] 
[03:04:26] *------------------------------*
[03:04:26] Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
[03:04:26] Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
[03:04:26] 
[03:04:26] Preparing to commence simulation
[03:04:26] - Looking at optimizations...
[03:04:26] - Created dyn
[03:04:26] - Files status OK
[03:04:26] - Expanded 45183 -> 204900 (decompressed 453.4 percent)
[03:04:26] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=45183 data_size=204900, decompressed_data_size=204900 diff=0
[03:04:26] - Digital signature verified
[03:04:26] 
[03:04:26] Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0)
[03:04:26] 
[03:04:26] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[03:04:26] Entering M.D.
[03:04:32] Mapping NT from 1 to 1 
[03:04:33] Completed 0 out of 10000000 steps  (0%)
[03:16:20] Completed 100000 out of 10000000 steps  (1%)
[03:28:05] Completed 200000 out of 10000000 steps  (2%)
[03:39:49] Completed 300000 out of 10000000 steps  (3%)
[03:51:33] Completed 400000 out of 10000000 steps  (4%)
[04:03:17] Completed 500000 out of 10000000 steps  (5%)
[04:15:03] Completed 600000 out of 10000000 steps  (6%)
[04:26:50] Completed 700000 out of 10000000 steps  (7%)
[04:38:39] Completed 800000 out of 10000000 steps  (8%)
[04:50:35] Completed 900000 out of 10000000 steps  (9%)
[05:02:34] Completed 1000000 out of 10000000 steps  (10%)
[05:14:27] Completed 1100000 out of 10000000 steps  (11%)
[05:26:21] Completed 1200000 out of 10000000 steps  (12%)
[05:38:23] Completed 1300000 out of 10000000 steps  (13%)
[05:50:33] Completed 1400000 out of 10000000 steps  (14%)
[06:02:25] Completed 1500000 out of 10000000 steps  (15%)
[06:14:12] Completed 1600000 out of 10000000 steps  (16%)
[06:26:00] Completed 1700000 out of 10000000 steps  (17%)
[06:37:47] Completed 1800000 out of 10000000 steps  (18%)
[06:44:56] - Autosending finished units... [June 30 06:44:56 UTC]
[06:44:56] Trying to send all finished work units
[06:44:56] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[06:44:56] - Autosend completed
[06:44:56] + Working...
[06:49:34] Completed 1900000 out of 10000000 steps  (19%)
[07:01:20] Completed 2000000 out of 10000000 steps  (20%)
[07:13:08] Completed 2100000 out of 10000000 steps  (21%)
[07:24:56] Completed 2200000 out of 10000000 steps  (22%)
[07:36:45] Completed 2300000 out of 10000000 steps  (23%)
[07:48:31] Completed 2400000 out of 10000000 steps  (24%)
[08:00:19] Completed 2500000 out of 10000000 steps  (25%)
[08:12:09] Completed 2600000 out of 10000000 steps  (26%)
[08:24:03] Completed 2700000 out of 10000000 steps  (27%)
[08:35:55] Completed 2800000 out of 10000000 steps  (28%)
[08:47:43] Completed 2900000 out of 10000000 steps  (29%)
[08:59:28] Completed 3000000 out of 10000000 steps  (30%)
[09:11:13] Completed 3100000 out of 10000000 steps  (31%)
[09:22:57] Completed 3200000 out of 10000000 steps  (32%)
[09:34:42] Completed 3300000 out of 10000000 steps  (33%)
[09:46:26] Completed 3400000 out of 10000000 steps  (34%)
[09:58:11] Completed 3500000 out of 10000000 steps  (35%)
[10:09:57] Completed 3600000 out of 10000000 steps  (36%)
[10:21:42] Completed 3700000 out of 10000000 steps  (37%)
[10:33:27] Completed 3800000 out of 10000000 steps  (38%)
[10:45:12] Completed 3900000 out of 10000000 steps  (39%)
[10:56:57] Completed 4000000 out of 10000000 steps  (40%)
[11:08:41] Completed 4100000 out of 10000000 steps  (41%)
[11:20:26] Completed 4200000 out of 10000000 steps  (42%)
[11:32:10] Completed 4300000 out of 10000000 steps  (43%)
[11:43:55] Completed 4400000 out of 10000000 steps  (44%)
[11:55:39] Completed 4500000 out of 10000000 steps  (45%)
[12:07:24] Completed 4600000 out of 10000000 steps  (46%)
[12:19:08] Completed 4700000 out of 10000000 steps  (47%)
[12:30:53] Completed 4800000 out of 10000000 steps  (48%)
[12:42:38] Completed 4900000 out of 10000000 steps  (49%)
[12:44:56] - Autosending finished units... [June 30 12:44:56 UTC]
[12:44:56] Trying to send all finished work units
[12:44:56] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[12:44:56] - Autosend completed
[12:44:56] + Working...
[12:54:22] Completed 5000000 out of 10000000 steps  (50%)
[13:06:07] Completed 5100000 out of 10000000 steps  (51%)
[13:17:52] Completed 5200000 out of 10000000 steps  (52%)
[13:29:37] Completed 5300000 out of 10000000 steps  (53%)
[13:41:22] Completed 5400000 out of 10000000 steps  (54%)
[13:53:07] Completed 5500000 out of 10000000 steps  (55%)
[14:04:52] Completed 5600000 out of 10000000 steps  (56%)
[14:16:37] Completed 5700000 out of 10000000 steps  (57%)
[14:28:21] Completed 5800000 out of 10000000 steps  (58%)
[14:40:06] Completed 5900000 out of 10000000 steps  (59%)
[14:51:50] Completed 6000000 out of 10000000 steps  (60%)
[15:03:35] Completed 6100000 out of 10000000 steps  (61%)
[15:15:20] Completed 6200000 out of 10000000 steps  (62%)
[15:27:05] Completed 6300000 out of 10000000 steps  (63%)
[15:38:51] Completed 6400000 out of 10000000 steps  (64%)
[15:50:36] Completed 6500000 out of 10000000 steps  (65%)
[16:02:22] Completed 6600000 out of 10000000 steps  (66%)
[16:14:06] Completed 6700000 out of 10000000 steps  (67%)
[16:25:52] Completed 6800000 out of 10000000 steps  (68%)
[16:37:55] Completed 6900000 out of 10000000 steps  (69%)
[16:49:40] Completed 7000000 out of 10000000 steps  (70%)
[17:01:24] Completed 7100000 out of 10000000 steps  (71%)
[17:13:08] Completed 7200000 out of 10000000 steps  (72%)
[17:24:52] Completed 7300000 out of 10000000 steps  (73%)
[17:36:36] Completed 7400000 out of 10000000 steps  (74%)
[17:48:19] Completed 7500000 out of 10000000 steps  (75%)
[18:00:04] Completed 7600000 out of 10000000 steps  (76%)
[18:11:47] Completed 7700000 out of 10000000 steps  (77%)
[18:23:31] Completed 7800000 out of 10000000 steps  (78%)
[18:35:15] Completed 7900000 out of 10000000 steps  (79%)
[18:44:56] - Autosending finished units... [June 30 18:44:56 UTC]
[18:44:56] Trying to send all finished work units
[18:44:56] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[18:44:56] - Autosend completed
[18:44:56] + Working...
[18:46:59] Completed 8000000 out of 10000000 steps  (80%)
[18:58:42] Completed 8100000 out of 10000000 steps  (81%)
[19:10:26] Completed 8200000 out of 10000000 steps  (82%)
[19:22:12] Completed 8300000 out of 10000000 steps  (83%)
[19:34:02] Completed 8400000 out of 10000000 steps  (84%)
[19:45:46] Completed 8500000 out of 10000000 steps  (85%)
[19:57:30] Completed 8600000 out of 10000000 steps  (86%)
[20:09:14] Completed 8700000 out of 10000000 steps  (87%)
[20:20:59] Completed 8800000 out of 10000000 steps  (88%)
[20:32:46] Completed 8900000 out of 10000000 steps  (89%)
[20:44:34] Completed 9000000 out of 10000000 steps  (90%)
[20:56:19] Completed 9100000 out of 10000000 steps  (91%)
[21:08:04] Completed 9200000 out of 10000000 steps  (92%)
[21:19:48] Completed 9300000 out of 10000000 steps  (93%)
[21:31:32] Completed 9400000 out of 10000000 steps  (94%)
[21:43:17] Completed 9500000 out of 10000000 steps  (95%)
[21:55:01] Completed 9600000 out of 10000000 steps  (96%)
[22:06:46] Completed 9700000 out of 10000000 steps  (97%)
[22:18:30] Completed 9800000 out of 10000000 steps  (98%)
[22:30:14] Completed 9900000 out of 10000000 steps  (99%)
[22:41:59] Completed 10000000 out of 10000000 steps  (100%)
[22:41:59] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
[22:42:09] 
[22:42:09] Finished Work Unit:
[22:42:09] - Reading up to 2113728 from "work/wudata_00.trr": Read 2113728
[22:42:09] trr file hash check passed.
[22:42:09] - Reading up to 220064 from "work/wudata_00.xtc": Read 220064
[22:42:09] xtc file hash check passed.
[22:42:09] edr file hash check passed.
[22:42:09] logfile size: 77787
[22:42:09] Leaving Run
[22:42:10] - Writing 2436051 bytes of core data to disk...
[22:42:10] Done: 2435539 -> 1891439 (compressed to 77.6 percent)
[22:42:10]   ... Done.
[22:42:11] - Shutting down core
[22:42:11] 
[22:42:11] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[22:42:13] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[22:42:13] Unit 0 finished with 93 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[22:42:13] Updated performance fraction: 0.893913
[22:42:13] Sending work to server
[22:42:13] Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0)
[22:42:13] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.


[22:42:13] + Attempting to send results [June 30 22:42:13 UTC]
[22:42:13] - Reading file work/wuresults_00.dat from core
[22:42:13]   (Read 1891951 bytes from disk)
[22:42:13] Connecting to http://129.74.85.15:8080/
[22:42:15] Posted data.
[22:42:15] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~924 kB/s
[22:42:15] - Averaged speed for that direction ~770 kB/s
[22:42:15] + Results successfully sent
[22:42:15] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[22:42:15] + Number of Units Completed: 945

[22:42:19] Trying to send all finished work units
[22:42:19] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[22:42:19] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[22:42:19] + Attempting to get work packet
[22:42:19] - Will indicate memory of 8183 MB
[22:42:19] - Connecting to assignment server
[22:42:19] Connecting to http://assign.stanford.edu:8080/
[22:42:21] Posted data.
[22:42:21] Initial: 4A81; - Successful: assigned to (129.74.85.15).
[22:42:21] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[22:42:21] Loaded queue successfully.
[22:42:21] Connecting to http://129.74.85.15:8080/
[22:42:22] Posted data.
[22:42:22] Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 45067)
[22:42:22] Conversation time very short, giving reduced weight in bandwidth avg
[22:42:22] - Downloaded at ~88 kB/s
[22:42:22] - Averaged speed for that direction ~119 kB/s
[22:42:22] + Received work.
[22:42:22] Trying to send all finished work units
[22:42:22] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[22:42:22] + Closed connections
[22:42:22] 
========
DrBB1
hammond
Pande Group Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:37 pm

Re: Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0): Incorrect Point

Post by hammond »

Thanks for the heads up, I'm looking into it right now.
izaguirr
Pande Group Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:37 pm

Re: Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0): Incorrect Point

Post by izaguirr »

We restarted the WS. Accidentally, a line that instructs the WS to give bonus points
in the XML configuration of the projects was missing.
It should give bonus points now. Thanks
for your help
Prof. Jesus A. Izaguirre, Ph.D.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Interdisciplinary Center for Network Science and Applications
University of Notre Dame, IN, USA
Member, Folding@Home Consortium, Stanford University, CA, USA
BonaSwirl
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 8:46 pm

Re: Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0): Incorrect Point

Post by BonaSwirl »

In a situation such as this, when a unit is submitted and hasn't received any bonus points, will the donor receive the bonus points they should have got at a later date or will it just be the base credit for the unit? I was just curious as to whether or not you guys had a way of backtracking?
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0): Incorrect Point

Post by PantherX »

Under some conditions, a manual re-credit is possible. However, it depends on the way the Project is setup and how it is handled. It is usually a time consuming work so only a PG Member can tell you if they plan to do it (now or at a later stage) or not.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
izaguirr
Pande Group Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:37 pm

Re: Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0): Incorrect Point

Post by izaguirr »

I will look into the possibility of manual re-crediting but I am not sure if that'll work
Prof. Jesus A. Izaguirre, Ph.D.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Interdisciplinary Center for Network Science and Applications
University of Notre Dame, IN, USA
Member, Folding@Home Consortium, Stanford University, CA, USA
izaguirr
Pande Group Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:37 pm

Re: Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0): Incorrect Point

Post by izaguirr »

I've confirmed that it is very difficult to do manual re-credit on these projects. However, it should be OK now
Prof. Jesus A. Izaguirre, Ph.D.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Interdisciplinary Center for Network Science and Applications
University of Notre Dame, IN, USA
Member, Folding@Home Consortium, Stanford University, CA, USA
DrBB1
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:30 am
Location: SE PA

Re: Project: 7004 (Run 1, Clone 235, Gen 0): Incorrect Point

Post by DrBB1 »

Well, glad I contributed to the fix with my post...here's to the greater good! Image
========
DrBB1
Post Reply