Intel Quick Sync - Can it be used for FAH?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
brentpresley
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:05 am
Hardware configuration: Too many to list.
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Intel Quick Sync - Can it be used for FAH?

Post by brentpresley »

OK, just got through reading this article:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/the- ... 100-tested

What struck me most was the transcoding performance of the dedicated paths in the new Sandy Bridge CPU.
Image

Image

Image

Now, I know this is not CUDA or ATI's implementation for GPU transcoding, so things might not work right, but I just wanted the powers that be here to realize that there is potentially some really amazing performance in these new chips, if FAH GPU can be modified to work using the new Quick Sync hardware in Sandy Bridge.

Might not be possible, but if speeds like this pan out, we could be talking some pretty amazing results.
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Intel Quick Sync - Can it be used for FAH?

Post by PantherX »

IIRC, that is because of the implementation of AVX which gives the astounding performance during video en/de/transcoding. Furthermore, GROMACS will eventually support AVX (viewtopic.php?f=38&t=15257)
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Intel Quick Sync - Can it be used for FAH?

Post by 7im »

Yep, Gromacs.org will have to add this support first, then Stanford can give it a go.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Intel Quick Sync - Can it be used for FAH?

Post by bruce »

Technically, transcoding and Quick Sync are rather specific processes used in video processing, and because they're used a lot, it makes sense to design specialized hardware to speed up those exact processes. Gromacs doesn't do video processing so that specialized hardware will not be used by Gromacs.

AVX is also specialized hardware but is less specific and can be used for a variety of different things, including speeding up those portions of video processing that are not done by pure hardware . . . and speeding up things like Gromacs.
brentpresley
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:05 am
Hardware configuration: Too many to list.
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: Intel Quick Sync - Can it be used for FAH?

Post by brentpresley »

//hopes for implementation in the V7 client// ;)
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: Intel Quick Sync - Can it be used for FAH?

Post by P5-133XL »

brentpresley wrote://hopes for implementation in the V7 client// ;)
All the folding work is done by the cores, not the client so what you want is it to be implemented in some new cores.
Image
gwildperson
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:36 pm

Re: Intel Quick Sync - Can it be used for FAH?

Post by gwildperson »

. . . and a new client will continue to use the existing cores, at least until they're replaced by a new one (hopefully starting with the ATI core, which is most in need of being rewritten).

An AVX-based core isn't likely to appear soon. It will take a while before there are as many AVX-based computers as there are computers that can run SMP or GPU or Classic software.
kg4icg
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:13 pm

Re: Intel Quick Sync - Can it be used for FAH?

Post by kg4icg »

From what I'm seeing of a review site actually Folding a WU as a Benchmark test. The I7-2600k is going to be a nice cpu to get. Even just the regular I7-2600 should be a winner too for A3 smp's.
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1501/19/
Bobcat
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:08 am
Hardware configuration: i7-860 2.8 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 1 TB HD, Win7 64-bit
Sapphire (ATI) 5670 825 MHz, 1 GB DDR5 RAM
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Intel Quick Sync - Can it be used for FAH?

Post by Bobcat »

4.9 GHz !!!
Post Reply