6507 (Run 13, Clone 16, Gen 56)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
lanbrown
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:21 am

6507 (Run 13, Clone 16, Gen 56)

Post by lanbrown »

Bad WU or just one of those that is picky about the hardware?

Code: Select all

[01:03:36] Completed 180000 out of 250000 steps  (72%)
[01:30:34] Writing local files
[01:30:34] Completed 182500 out of 250000 steps  (73%)
[01:57:47] Writing local files
[01:57:47] Completed 185000 out of 250000 steps  (74%)
[02:24:47] Writing local files
[02:24:48] Completed 187500 out of 250000 steps  (75%)
[02:51:55] Writing local files
[02:51:55] Completed 190000 out of 250000 steps  (76%)
[02:59:06] Gromacs cannot continue further.
[02:59:06] Going to send back what have done.
[02:59:06] logfile size: 18487
[02:59:06] - Writing 19023 bytes of core data to disk...
[02:59:06] Done: 18511 -> 4237 (compressed to 22.8 percent)
[02:59:06]   ... Done.
[02:59:06] 
[02:59:06] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[02:59:08] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[02:59:09] Sending work to server
[02:59:09] Project: 6507 (Run 13, Clone 16, Gen 56)


[02:59:09] + Attempting to send results [September 7 02:59:09 UTC]
[02:59:12] + Results successfully sent
[02:59:12] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6455
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: 6507 (Run 13, Clone 16, Gen 56)

Post by toTOW »

There are not a lot of results yet, but the two I see are EUEs at the exact same point ... I think that's probably WU related.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
sortofageek
Site Admin
Posts: 3110
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Team Helix
Contact:

Re: 6507 (Run 13, Clone 16, Gen 56)

Post by sortofageek »

The WU (P6507,R13,C16,G56) has been reported as a bad WU.
Post Reply