Project: 2633 (Run 5, Clone 17, Gen 8)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
sirmonkey
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 8:51 am

Project: 2633 (Run 5, Clone 17, Gen 8)

Post by sirmonkey »

yep mine bit the dust too.. so promising.. i was loving the 3:12 TPF on my phenom II 940 @ 3.4ghz :(

Code: Select all

Launch directory: C:\Folding@home SMP
Executable: C:\Folding@home SMP\folding smp client.exe
Arguments: -smp -forceasm 

[07:36:38] - Ask before connecting: No
[07:36:38] - User name: sirmonkeyfileserver (Team 33)
[07:36:38] - User ID: 
[07:36:38] - Machine ID: 1
[07:36:38] 
[07:36:39] Loaded queue successfully.
[07:36:39] 
[07:36:39] + Processing work unit
[07:36:39] Core required: FahCore_a3.exe
[07:36:39] Core found.
[07:36:39] Working on queue slot 03 [August 30 07:36:39 UTC]
[07:36:39] + Working ...
[07:36:39] 
[07:36:39] *------------------------------*
[07:36:39] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[07:36:39] Version 2.22 (Mar 12, 2010)
[07:36:39] 
[07:36:39] Preparing to commence simulation
[07:36:39] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
[07:36:48] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[07:36:48] - Not checking prior termination.
[07:36:49] - Expanded 2330906 -> 2476225 (decompressed 106.2 percent)
[07:36:49] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=2330906 data_size=2476225, decompressed_data_size=2476225 diff=0
[07:36:49] - Digital signature verified
[07:36:49] 
[07:36:49] Project: 2633 (Run 5, Clone 17, Gen 8)
[07:36:49] 
[07:36:49] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[07:36:49] Entering M.D.
[07:36:55] Using Gromacs checkpoints
[07:36:55] Resuming from checkpoint
[07:36:55] Verified work/wudata_03.log
[07:36:55] Verified work/wudata_03.trr
[07:36:55] Verified work/wudata_03.xtc
[07:36:55] Verified work/wudata_03.edr
[07:36:55] Completed 17900 out of 625000 steps  (2%)
[07:37:21] Completed 18750 out of 625000 steps  (3%)
[07:40:28] Completed 25000 out of 625000 steps  (4%)
[07:43:46] Completed 31250 out of 625000 steps  (5%)
[07:46:58] Completed 37500 out of 625000 steps  (6%)
[07:50:14] Completed 43750 out of 625000 steps  (7%)
[07:53:28] Completed 50000 out of 625000 steps  (8%)
[07:56:41] Completed 56250 out of 625000 steps  (9%)
[08:00:04] Completed 62500 out of 625000 steps  (10%)
[08:03:28] Completed 68750 out of 625000 steps  (11%)
[08:07:38] Completed 75000 out of 625000 steps  (12%)
[08:11:50] Completed 81250 out of 625000 steps  (13%)
[08:14:39] mdrun returned 255
[08:14:39] Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=625000
[08:14:39] Work fraction=0.1372 steps=625000.
[08:14:43] logfile size=46026 infoLength=46026 edr=0 trr=25
[08:14:43] logfile size: 46026 info=46026 bed=0 hdr=25
[08:14:43] - Writing 46564 bytes of core data to disk...
[08:14:43]   ... Done.
[08:14:43] 
[08:14:43] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[08:14:47] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[08:14:47] Sending work to server
[08:14:47] Project: 2633 (Run 5, Clone 17, Gen 8)


[08:14:47] + Attempting to send results [August 30 08:14:47 UTC]
[08:14:48] + Results successfully sent
[08:14:48] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
sortofageek
Site Admin
Posts: 3110
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Team Helix
Contact:

Re: Project: 2633 (Run 5, Clone 17, Gen 8)

Post by sortofageek »

I split your post out of a thread in another forum to a new topic. This is the appropriate forum for reporting suspect WUs.

I looked this one up and, so far, I only see your report. There is not yet enough evidence to count it as a bad WU, but the mods will try to keep an eye on it until we can make a determination.

Hi sirmonkeyfileserver (team 33),
Your WU (P2633 R5 C17 G8) was added to the stats database on 2010-08-30 01:21:01 for 32.24 points of credit.
sortofageek
Site Admin
Posts: 3110
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Team Helix
Contact:

Re: Project: 2633 (Run 5, Clone 17, Gen 8)

Post by sortofageek »

This WU has now been completed by another folder and returned for full credit, not a bad WU.
sirmonkey
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 8:51 am

Re: Project: 2633 (Run 5, Clone 17, Gen 8)

Post by sirmonkey »

not really say its bad.. just saying it failed.. but from what i can gather from people on my team as well that its running fine on intel processors but failing on AMD processors.. so far 3 people have completed them on my team.. a C2D and 2 xeons.. and mine failed and the guy in the other threads failed which both of us are running AMD processors.. but thats my only conclusion so far since i haven't received another one.. out of the 700 or so SMP WU's I've done that's the first one I've ever had had fail on me and it wasn't from an unstable machine error either.. will see if i get another one though and see what happens..
Post Reply