Time to get a SMP client (by Q4 08) with more than 4 fahcores.excerpt from article wrote:Dunnington, Intel's 45nm six-core Xeon processor from the Penryn family, will succeed the Xeon Tigerton processor. Whereas Tigerton is essentially two 65nm Core 2 Duo processors fused on one package, Dunnington will be Intel's first Core 2 Duo processor with three dual-core banks.
Dunnington includes 16MB of L3 cache shared by all six processors. Each pair of cores can also access 3MB of local L2 cache.
Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 10179
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
http://www.dailytech.com/Sun+Leaks+6cor ... e10834.htm
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
Maybe in 2017
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
We'll have a F@H SMP core ready by that time that can handle the required number of CPU cores.
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
That's really cool, tho unfortunately that would mean a person like myself(I'm completely linux stupid) would have to upgrade to vista, since XP would see that as three processors.
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:08 pm
- Location: Central New York
- Contact:
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
from this page.Windows XP Professional can support up to two processors regardless of the number of cores on the processor.
Microsoft Windows XP Home supports one processor
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:45 pm
- Location: Oklahoma
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
Sure you will.kasson wrote:We'll have a F@H SMP core ready by that time that can handle the required number of CPU cores.
Facts are not truth. Facts are merely facets of the shining diamond of truth.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:44 pm
- Hardware configuration: Q6600 G0 @3.0GHz - 9657AB, OCZ600SXS 2x8800GS 1x running GPU2, VM-Notfred SMP (2), Vista 32bit
Q6600 G0 @3.0GHz -IP35V, EA430, Notfred SMP diskless
Q6600 G0 @3.0GHz -IP35E, Antec 650W. Notfred SMP diskless
X3210 B3 @3.0GHz - P5B-965 Deluxe EA430, Notfred SMP diskless
X3210 G0 @2.8GHz - GA-G31M-S2L EA380, Notfred SMP diskless
E6300 B2 @3.0GHz - GA-965P-DS3,, CP-500T, HD3870 GPU2, XP MCE
E2160@1.8GHz generic emachine, EA380, 9600GSO GPU2,1 CPU client, vista 32bit
P4@3.2GHz generic emachine, NEO380, 8800GT GPU2, XP MCE
Athlon64@2.2GHz - NFK8AB-RS, EA430, 8800GT GPU2, XP Pro 32bit - Location: Wichita
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
et tu cabler?
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
This is one physical processor, one socket if you like it better. Logical processors (Hyperthreading) and cores in the same processors are all on the same socket, so it is supported.Flathead74 wrote:from this page.Windows XP Professional can support up to two processors regardless of the number of cores on the processor.Microsoft Windows XP Home supports one processor
P.S : XP Pro supports two physical processors (I run a bi-opteron 2212 under XP Pro, which is a dual socket F system : two physical processors, four cores (2*2))
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
I was told that the Intel chips, in the case of the Quad, 2 dual cores on one socket, but still counted as two processors, each with two cores. Thus a box with two of AMD's Quad's would work under XP Pro, but two of Intel's would not. Is this actually not the case? XP just displays each core as a processor under Device Manager. If I am mistaken, I take back my previous comment.
Edit: Sentence didn't make much sense, still is a bit off, but meh, its comprehensible.
Edit: Sentence didn't make much sense, still is a bit off, but meh, its comprehensible.
-
- Posts: 10179
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
You were told incorrectly.zanth wrote:I was told that the Intel chips, in the case of the Quad, 2 dual cores on one socket, but still counted as two processors, each with two cores. Thus a box with two of AMD's Quad's would work under XP Pro, but two of Intel's would not. Is this actually not the case? XP just displays each core as a processor under Device Manager. If I am mistaken, I take back my previous comment.
Edit: Sentence didn't make much sense, still is a bit off, but meh, its comprehensible.
I published the list of supported processor sockets per MS operating system in the Known Bugs List sticky post at the top of the Windows SMP Beta section of the forum. MS only looks at sockets, not cores, and doesn't care about Intel vs. AMD. My list probably came from the same link Flathead74 posted above.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:15 pm
- Location: Michigan
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
I'm running a q6600 with XP Home- 4 cores, one socket, works fine.
Proud to crash my machines as a Beta Tester!
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:29 pm
- Hardware configuration: Various platforms all sporting graphics cards: two x86-64 systems running Windws-10; four x86-64 systems running AlmaLinux-8 (the defacto distro for people that used to run CentOS)
- Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
- Contact:
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
Here are two more articles:7im wrote:http://www.dailytech.com/Sun+Leaks+6cor ... e10834.htm
Time to get a SMP client (by Q4 08) with more than 4 fahcores.excerpt from article wrote:Dunnington, Intel's 45nm six-core Xeon processor from the Penryn family, will succeed the Xeon Tigerton processor. Whereas Tigerton is essentially two 65nm Core 2 Duo processors fused on one package, Dunnington will be Intel's first Core 2 Duo processor with three dual-core banks.
Dunnington includes 16MB of L3 cache shared by all six processors. Each pair of cores can also access 3MB of local L2 cache.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20 ... essor.html
http://gizmodo.com/360476/intels-6+core ... ors-leaked
Neil Rieck
Kitchener/Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Neil Rieck
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Re: Sun Leaks 6-core Intel Xeon, Nehalem Details
Ah, thats very good to know, thank you for setting me straight. The more you know and all that.7im wrote:You were told incorrectly.zanth wrote:I was told that the Intel chips, in the case of the Quad, 2 dual cores on one socket, but still counted as two processors, each with two cores. Thus a box with two of AMD's Quad's would work under XP Pro, but two of Intel's would not. Is this actually not the case? XP just displays each core as a processor under Device Manager. If I am mistaken, I take back my previous comment.
Edit: Sentence didn't make much sense, still is a bit off, but meh, its comprehensible.
I published the list of supported processor sockets per MS operating system in the Known Bugs List sticky post at the top of the Windows SMP Beta section of the forum. MS only looks at sockets, not cores, and doesn't care about Intel vs. AMD. My list probably came from the same link Flathead74 posted above.