171.64.65.20 in Reject

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

anko1
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Location: SF Peninsula

171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by anko1 »

Rather than drag one of the older threads back up (and couldn't decide which one to pick ;-) ), I thought I'd post a new notice.

Tue Oct 14 21:35:20 PDT 2008 171.64.65.20 GPU vspg1 densign full Reject 0.02 3 38 17883

Edit: PS - in case this is one that's supposed to automatically restart after an hour, it's been down for about 1-1/2 hrs.

Tue Oct 14 19:55:20 PDT 2008 171.64.65.20 GPU vspg1 densign full Reject
ei57
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:23 am

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by ei57 »

FYI!

171.64.65.20 GPU vspg1 densign full Reject
mikeb12
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:51 am
Location: South Carolina USA

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by mikeb12 »

again http://171.64.65.20/
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/serverstat.html
171.64.65.20 GPU vspg1 densign full Reject
Razor_FX_II
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:21 am
Hardware configuration: Proud Member of the [H]orde
Proud Member of the [H]ard DC Commandos

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by Razor_FX_II »

Good decision on the thread anko1, I really couldn't bear to relive the nightmare of the previous like thread.
...and yes it's still down.
Proud Member of the [H]orde
Proud Member of the [H]ard DC Commandos
Teddy
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:05 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by Teddy »

Got 7 idle GPU clients here not to mention can't return work to 160 OR 42.
What a mess!

I think it might be time to shut the bulk of my farm down.

Teddy
MoneyGuyBK
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:40 am
Location: Team_XPS ..... OC, S. Calif

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by MoneyGuyBK »

+1






Peace
T.E.A.M. “Together Everyone Accomplishes Miracles!”
Image
OC, S. California ... God Bless All
osgorth
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:46 am

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by osgorth »

Working again! :)
Image
Teddy
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:05 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by Teddy »

Yep some of my boxen are getting work now...

time to partially crank the farm back..

Teddy
zxy
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:58 pm

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by zxy »

got mad about the poor server

Code: Select all

[07:39:00] - Writing 1293732 bytes of core data to disk...
[07:39:00] Done: 1293220 -> 1156128 (compressed to 89.3 percent)
[07:39:00]   ... Done.
[07:39:01] - Shutting down core 
[07:39:01] 
[07:39:01] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[07:39:04] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[07:39:04] Sending work to server
[07:39:04] Project: 5013 (Run 7, Clone 472, Gen 4)


[07:39:04] + Attempting to send results [October 24 07:39:04 UTC]
[07:39:05] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[07:39:05] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[07:39:05]     (171.64.65.20:8080)
[07:39:05] + Retrying using alternative port
[07:39:07] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[07:39:07] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[07:39:07]     (171.64.65.20:80)
[07:39:07] - Error: Could not transmit unit 06 (completed October 24) to work server.
[07:39:07]   Keeping unit 06 in queue.
[07:39:07] Project: 5013 (Run 7, Clone 472, Gen 4)


[07:39:07] + Attempting to send results [October 24 07:39:07 UTC]
[07:39:14] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[07:39:14] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[07:39:14]     (171.64.65.20:8080)
[07:39:14] + Retrying using alternative port
[07:39:18] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[07:39:18] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[07:39:18]     (171.64.65.20:80)
[07:39:18] - Error: Could not transmit unit 06 (completed October 24) to work server.


[07:39:18] + Attempting to send results [October 24 07:39:18 UTC]
[07:39:49] - Server does not have record of this unit. Will try again later.
[07:39:49]   Could not transmit unit 06 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[07:39:49] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[07:39:49] + Attempting to get work packet
[07:39:49] - Connecting to assignment server
[07:39:50] - Successful: assigned to (171.67.108.11).
[07:39:50] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[07:39:50] Loaded queue successfully.
[07:39:52] Project: 5013 (Run 7, Clone 472, Gen 4)


[07:39:52] + Attempting to send results [October 24 07:39:52 UTC]
[07:39:54] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[07:39:54] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[07:39:54]     (171.64.65.20:8080)
[07:39:54] + Retrying using alternative port
[07:39:56] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[07:39:56] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[07:39:56]     (171.64.65.20:80)
[07:39:56] - Error: Could not transmit unit 06 (completed October 24) to work server.


[07:39:56] + Attempting to send results [October 24 07:39:56 UTC]
[07:40:29] - Server does not have record of this unit. Will try again later.
[07:40:29]   Could not transmit unit 06 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[07:40:29] + Closed connections
Last edited by toTOW on Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Added code tags.
Image
osgorth
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:46 am

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by osgorth »

Yes, it's rejecting again.. :(
Image
mikeb12
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:51 am
Location: South Carolina USA

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by mikeb12 »

yup again this morning since

00:50:20 PDT 2008 171.64.65.20 GPU vspg1 densign full Reject
zxy
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:58 pm

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by zxy »

8gpu clients no work to do........
Image
Teddy
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:05 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by Teddy »

Not only are the GPU servers not working, the proteins sent earlier gave a stack of Eue's & these were on well cooled, stock graphics cards..
Stanford has a lot of problems on their hands...

Teddy
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6359
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by toTOW »

It's 4am in Stanford ... please be patient.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
rbrandman
Pande Group Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 4:11 pm

Re: 171.64.65.20 in Reject

Post by rbrandman »

should be back up now.

Relly
Post Reply