Will F@H finish?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Zarxrax
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:04 pm

Will F@H finish?

Post by Zarxrax »

Folding@Home has been around for a number of years now, and I was just starting to wonder, is this project something that can be completed, or will it be ongoing for the rest of the foreseeable future? If this project has a finish line, how close are we to reaching it?
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Post by 7im »

Most people have vowed to continue folding until every disease has a cure. (...or at least the last 2 people I asked... ;) )

Much progress has been made (see the Results page on the project web site) but much more has yet to be done. No finish line is forseeable as yet.
socceronly
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: Will F@H finish?

Post by socceronly »

Zarxrax wrote:Folding@Home has been around for a number of years now, and I was just starting to wonder, is this project something that can be completed, or will it be ongoing for the rest of the foreseeable future? If this project has a finish line, how close are we to reaching it?
I may be talking out the wrong part of my body... but....

I don't think so.

As more computers, and more powerful computers, are added, it will allow the scientists to do more complex things, or things they thought may have been previously impossible.

Will it always be the same? No, but I don't think scientists in any forseeable future are going to run out of things to do on a massive distributing computing environment.

Even if it means doing the same thing better, more accurately, or testing a theory in different ways.

Sure there is a forward march in computing that everyone is aware of. But ask the scientists involved if they thought at some point in the future they would have thousands of 4, 8 or 80 core CPUs or a quarter million game machines crunching away on stuff..... I would be surprised if they made that assumption (or any assumption for that matter).

So the very nature of the project may itself be a continuous evolving thing . I doubt in any way that it is a static entity with a finish line.
Rebel44
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: Prague - Czech Republic
Contact:

Post by Rebel44 »

7im wrote:Most people have vowed to continue folding until every disease has a cure. (...or at least the last 2 people I asked... ;) )

Much progress has been made (see the Results page on the project web site) but much more has yet to be done. No finish line is forseeable as yet.
QFT :!: - even with 10 times more powerfull computers it wouldnt be finished soon because we would be processing more complex simulations...
endrik
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: Wroclaw, Poland
Contact:

Post by endrik »

Add to this an inherent feature of scientific work - that each new answer gives grounds for ten new questions... it's snowballing, you know.
In a graphic example, if you picture our knowledge as a sphere, then as we increase the contents its radius grows by second power, in the same time increasing surface of the sphere (i.e. border with the uknown) by third power.

Of course it is not that bad with FAH, as we are doing rather 'laboratory', not the fundamental research - still I wouldn't be waiting for any definite end to the project. There is really a lot things that can be simulated, anyway ;)
yours,
endrik

*Bookworms will rule the world
(after we finish the background reading).
7up1n3
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:55 am
Contact:

Post by 7up1n3 »

God willing, someday we'll solve the riddle of protein mis-folding. Until then, I Fold.
Image
Rage3D Admin ~ The Fighting 300 ~ Team Rage3D Folding
RexB
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:09 pm

Re: Will F@H finish?

Post by RexB »

We're in it for the long haul .... I been on 3 teams in 4 years and we just Keep on Truc... er ... Folding 8-)
ruth
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:44 am

Re: Will F@H finish?

Post by ruth »

Is it possible to cure diseases that you get from others?
Like those that you infected with
vraa
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:36 am

Re: Will F@H finish?

Post by vraa »

I'm folding until this project is dismantled.
Then I'm doing whatever other distributed computing project exists.
v00d00
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:53 am
Hardware configuration: FX8320e (6 cores enabled) @ stock,
- 16GB DDR3,
- Zotac GTX 1050Ti @ Stock.
- Gigabyte GTX 970 @ Stock
Debian 9.

Running GPU since it came out, CPU since client version 3.
Folding since Folding began (~2000) and ran Genome@Home for a while too.
Ran Seti@Home prior to that.
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Will F@H finish?

Post by v00d00 »

ruth wrote:Is it possible to cure diseases that you can get from others?
Like those that you are infected with.
Probably, one day.

The scientific world is still in its infancy if you look at it in the grand scheme of things. Computers have only been around for a short while in a useful form. Distributed computing even less. But every simulation we run helps scientists understand the bigger picture a little better. With time new solutions will be found which will add up to new drugs and possibilities.
Image
Post Reply