small arm64 sbc - folding stuck @ 1%

A forum for discussing FAH-related hardware choices and info on actual products (not speculation).

Moderator: Site Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Post Reply
nada391
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2025 10:46 am

small arm64 sbc - folding stuck @ 1%

Post by nada391 »

Hello ,

have installed the folding software for arm64 on a small mini-pc
based on arm64 architecture;

have noticed that it begins to fold, but then stops at 1% mark;

there is no error present,
but there is sort of warning in yellow that is not easily legible
like

20:28:11:W :Unrecognized option 'gpu'
20:28:11:W :Unrecognized option 'power'

do i need the hardware get approved beforehand or is it simply not being considered for further processing?

thanks
Last edited by nada391 on Sun Feb 22, 2026 10:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6537
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: small arm64 sbc - folding stuck @ 1%

Post by toTOW »

Post some logs from the client.

And don't have high expectations for such low power things, if it's less powerful than a RPi 5, it won't make the deadlines and will be useless.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
muziqaz
Posts: 2443
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
Hardware configuration: 9950x, 9950x3d, 7950x3d, 5950x, 5800x3d
7900xtx, RX9070, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX550, Intel B580
Location: London
Contact:

Re: small arm64 sbc - folding stuck @ 1%

Post by muziqaz »

nada391 wrote: Sun Feb 22, 2026 9:27 pm Hello ,

have installed the folding software for arm64 on a small mini-pc
based on arm64 architecture;

have noticed that it begins to fold, but then stops at 1% mark;

there is no error present,
but there is sort of warning in yellow that is not easily legible
like

20:28:11:W :Unrecognized option 'gpu'
20:28:11:W :Unrecognized option 'power'

do i need the hardware get approved beforehand or is it simply not being considered for further processing?

thanks
It is not stuck, it is probably too slow to fold and is just simply still trying to get through that 1st percentage
your log snippet is remnants of your move from v7 to v8, and has no bearing on your hardware not being able to fold fast enough
FAH Omega tester
Image
nada391
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2025 10:46 am

Re: small arm64 sbc - folding stuck @ 1%

Post by nada391 »

am simply wondering since had older smaller sbc folding and those wnt through,
it could be that something changed lately and the small sbc no longer being considered powerful? enough.
will seen if can find any logs, true , the sbc is already bit outdated, but still powerful (if compared to raspberry pi4 for example)

EDIt: oh, sorry, it went further, now it sits at 1,6%; just foalse alarm; please consider topic closed, thanks.
muziqaz
Posts: 2443
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
Hardware configuration: 9950x, 9950x3d, 7950x3d, 5950x, 5800x3d
7900xtx, RX9070, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX550, Intel B580
Location: London
Contact:

Re: small arm64 sbc - folding stuck @ 1%

Post by muziqaz »

rPI were never considered powerful enough for FAH. If it barely makes the deadlines that is not powerful enough, that is just barely powerful
FAH Omega tester
Image
nada391
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2025 10:46 am

Re: small arm64 sbc - folding stuck @ 1%

Post by nada391 »

still powerful enough to get a proper software version, but yes, thanks again, the number went down from 36.000 to around 1.500; thought have a powerful player in the house; will find some other use for it :)

best of wishes.
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 8341
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Studio M1 Max 32 GB smp6
Mac Hack i7-7700K 48 GB smp4
Location: W. MA

Re: small arm64 sbc - folding stuck @ 1%

Post by Joe_H »

Also check that it isn't going into a power saving mode and slowing down processing. Depending on the OS and version systems may do that unless disabled when no interactive usage is detected by the OS.
Image
Post Reply