Anyone else running Core Ultra cpu folding?

A forum for discussing FAH-related hardware choices and info on actual products (not speculation).

Moderator: Site Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Post Reply
notyettoday
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:08 pm
Hardware configuration: 4080S, 4070TI, 4070, 4060 ti, 4060 ti, 4060, 3080,
7950x, 7700x, 7600, 5800x, 5600x, 5600g, Ultra 7 265k

Anyone else running Core Ultra cpu folding?

Post by notyettoday »

Hello all,

I was surprised to see there wasn't any discussion about the Intel Core Ultra cpus. I suppose with GPU folding being much more efficient that makes sense. I decided to grab a 265K with some 7600mhz ram, So far I'm observing 550k-800k estimates in the v7 client on 19 cores, which is close to my 7950x rig, impressive. Power usage is hovering in the 160w area on average according to HWinfo. I'd be curious to hear other's results!
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7988
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: Anyone else running Core Ultra cpu folding?

Post by Joe_H »

People have not been commenting here much beyond gripes about Intel processors recently. The big-little configuration is not well utilized by the CPU folding core code. The Windows scheduler also has its quirks about dealing with big-little, often scheduling the folding threads on the efficiency cores instead of the performance cores. Utilizing the performance cores tends to slow down WU processing.

It would be interesting to see what processing on just the 8 performance cores gets for PPD. Under Windows that may take using a third party utility such as Process Lasso to get the CPU folding core threads assigned to the performance cores.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Post Reply