I have a Radeon card
06:32:57:W :CUDA not supported: Failed to open dynamic library 'libcuda.so': libcuda.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory06:32:57:I3:gpus = {
06:32:57:I3: "gpu:03:00:00": {
06:32:57:I3: "vendor": 4098,
06:32:57:I3: "type": "amd",
06:32:57:I3: "description": "gfx1034",
06:32:57:I3: "opencl": {"platform": 0, "device": 0, "compute": "2.0", "driver": "3614.0"},
06:32:57:I3: "device": 29759,
06:32:57:I3: "supported": true
06:32:57:I3: },
06:32:57:I3: "gpu:13:00:00": {
06:32:57:I3: "vendor": 4098,
06:32:57:I3: "type": "amd",
06:32:57:I3: "description": "gfx1036",
06:32:57:I3: "opencl": {"platform": 0, "device": 1, "compute": "2.0", "driver": "3614.0"},
06:32:57:I3: "device": 5710,
06:32:57:I3: "supported": true
06:32:57:I3: }
06:32:57:I3:}
I thought I was sunk, but... it appears to be working !
(and for reference I simply followed the AMD driver installation instructions , i.e. that uses 'amdgpu-install' under linux mint 21.1)
I'm a little fuzzy on all this cuda and opencl, is this message showing up simply because I'm not using an nvidia card ?
The other thing I was wondering - is there any way for me to gauge how much faster, or slower, the GPU card is than the CPU ?
Thanks!
dreaded failed to open libcuda.so but works ?
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:54 pm
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:33 am
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Contact:
Re: dreaded failed to open libcuda.so but works ?
That message is expected if you don’t have CUDA installed. Nothing to worry about, unless you’re trying to fold on nvidia.
GPUs are much faster than CPUs. You will see much higher estimated points per day.
GPUs are much faster than CPUs. You will see much higher estimated points per day.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:54 pm
Re: dreaded failed to open libcuda.so but works ?
So that's what PPD stands for ! lol
I've noticed the PPD numbers move around. The CPU was 700k and the GPU 200k about an hour ago, but now the CPU is 200k.
I'm reading through the DB trying to figure out what the expected performance is.
I've noticed the PPD numbers move around. The CPU was 700k and the GPU 200k about an hour ago, but now the CPU is 200k.
I'm reading through the DB trying to figure out what the expected performance is.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:33 am
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Contact:
Re: dreaded failed to open libcuda.so but works ?
It will vary wildly by project. It also won’t be accurate until a few percent done.
-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: 7950x3D, 5950x, 5800x3D, 3900x
7900xtx, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX 550 640SP - Location: London
- Contact:
Re: dreaded failed to open libcuda.so but works ?
Yes, AMD is not using CUDA (yet ). Developer likes this error message, so it is here to stay for us AMD people
FAH Omega tester
-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: 7950x3D, 5950x, 5800x3D, 3900x
7900xtx, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX 550 640SP - Location: London
- Contact:
Re: dreaded failed to open libcuda.so but works ?
You might want to either pause your gfx1036 (Radeon integrated graphics inside of your CPU), or disable it completely in BIOS (if you are not using it for something). That iGPU will not get any work, until HIP arrives, but even then, quite slow for FAH
FAH Omega tester