ETA nonsensical after reboot

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Peter_Hucker
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2022 1:18 am
Hardware configuration: Ryzen 9 3900XT: 24 cores, 128GB RAM, 1TB NVME, 4TB HDD, R9 Nano (Fiji) GPU.
Ryzen 9 3900X: 24 cores, 64GB RAM, 250GB NVME.
Xeon X5650 dual CPU server: 24 cores, 64GB RAM, 250GB NVME, R9 290(Hawaii) GPU.
Xeon X5650 dual CPU server: 24 cores, 64GB RAM, 250GB NVME.
I3-6100: 4 cores, 32GB RAM, 250GB NVME, 2 of R9 2980X (Tahiti) GPUs.
5 other smaller computers.
Location: Scotland

ETA nonsensical after reboot

Post by Peter_Hucker »

If you reboot the computer, it shows the ETA to be something like 40 seconds instead of 2 hours. Looks like it's thinking the 65% already completed before rebooting took only a minute, when actually it was just reading it from the checkpoint.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6411
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: ETA nonsensical after reboot

Post by toTOW »

I guess it's from the CPU core ? If yes, v7 was showing the same behaviour and it's because of how CPU core handles checkpoints.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Peter_Hucker
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2022 1:18 am
Hardware configuration: Ryzen 9 3900XT: 24 cores, 128GB RAM, 1TB NVME, 4TB HDD, R9 Nano (Fiji) GPU.
Ryzen 9 3900X: 24 cores, 64GB RAM, 250GB NVME.
Xeon X5650 dual CPU server: 24 cores, 64GB RAM, 250GB NVME, R9 290(Hawaii) GPU.
Xeon X5650 dual CPU server: 24 cores, 64GB RAM, 250GB NVME.
I3-6100: 4 cores, 32GB RAM, 250GB NVME, 2 of R9 2980X (Tahiti) GPUs.
5 other smaller computers.
Location: Scotland

Re: ETA nonsensical after reboot

Post by Peter_Hucker »

No, this is GPU tasks.
Post Reply