18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

geokilla
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Intel Core i5-10600KF @ 4.9Ghz @ 1.25V
MSI Z490 Gaming Edge Wi-Fi BIOS v17
XPG D50 32GB DDR4-3200 16-19-9-36 2T (Samsung M-Die)
XPG S11 Pro 1TB and Western Digital WD140EDFZ 14TB
EVGA RTX 3060 XC
Corsair RM650x
Phantek P360A with Noctua Exhaust Fans
Location: Toronto, Canada

18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by geokilla »

Any way to speed it up? TPF of 3m 7s and getting only 36h/48h for it to complete is not ideal when I don't leave my computer on to fold 24/7. I try to finish the projects before I turn it off at night or when I'm out for long periods of time but sometimes it just expires.
Intel Core i5-10600KF @ 4.9Ghz @ 1.25V
MSI Z490 Gaming Edge Wi-Fi BIOS v17
XPG D50 32GB DDR4-3200 16-19-9-36 2T (Samsung M-Die)
XPG S11 Pro 1TB and Western Digital WD140EDFZ 14TB
ASUS TUF RTX 3070 OC
Corsair RM650x
Phantek P360A with Noctua Exhaust Fans
kiore
Posts: 921
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by kiore »

You are not alone, I am afraid this one suits very few people, just how it goes with variation this is an outlier on the lower end of the scale. Finish it and hopefully draw a different one next time is my philosophy.
Image
i7 7800x RTX 3070 OS= win10. AMD 3700x RTX 2080ti OS= win10 .

Team page: https://www.rationalskepticism.org/viewtopic.php?t=616
BobWilliams757
Posts: 515
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:22 pm
Hardware configuration: ASRock X370M PRO4
Ryzen 2400G APU
16 GB DDR4-3200
MSI GTX 1660 Super Gaming X

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by BobWilliams757 »

It could be much worse, and the luck of the assignment server is just that. When they are slow and long it seems forever, but in reality if you think that you probably haven't folded on really slow gear lately.

Back when I was folding in my iGPU I was fine was frame time was "only" 10 minutes or so. Often they were over 20 minutes.

It's really not that hard to break 6 hours of folding down over a couple of days. We just want them short and sweet, and paying high points, much of the time. We can't always get that, so you give up points or let it run.
Fold them if you get them!
Mxyzptlk
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 8:55 pm
Hardware configuration: Lots... Look at my website: www.mxyzptlk.us
Location: California
Contact:

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by Mxyzptlk »

Cancer sucks.
So do Cancer WU’s.

This is the way.
I fold..... look at my folding setups here: https://mxyzptlk.us/about/
BobWilliams757
Posts: 515
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:22 pm
Hardware configuration: ASRock X370M PRO4
Ryzen 2400G APU
16 GB DDR4-3200
MSI GTX 1660 Super Gaming X

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by BobWilliams757 »

It's seems many people complain about this project. Is it really that bad on newer GPU's?

Though far from a top performer, I have several projects that give lower PPD on my 1660 Super. Some have more atoms, some have less, but none of the others seems to have created the dislike that 18717 has.
Fold them if you get them!
pyrocyborg
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2022 1:45 am
Hardware configuration: 3060 12GB, 3060 Ti, 3070, 3080, 3090, 6700 XT, 6800 XT, 6900 XT

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by pyrocyborg »

Not much you can do about it. We're talking an "ETA" of less than 3 hours 30 minutes on a 3070, so it's really not that hard to do on modern gear over the course of a day and a half or two days.
Last edited by pyrocyborg on Wed May 17, 2023 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pyrocyborg
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2022 1:45 am
Hardware configuration: 3060 12GB, 3060 Ti, 3070, 3080, 3090, 6700 XT, 6800 XT, 6900 XT

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by pyrocyborg »

BobWilliams757 wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 9:30 pm It's seems many people complain about this project. Is it really that bad on newer GPU's?
It's low PPD and it somehow takes a long time to complete despite lower than average PPD, but it's really not that bad on modern hardware. It takes roughly 3 hours and a half on a 3060 Ti or 3070. Less than 2 hours and a half with a 3080.

It takes a while on a 6700 XT, but these AMD cards aren't that great for folding to begin with, so it's nothing surprising.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6349
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by toTOW »

I heard that this project might be finishing soon ... ;)
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
promeneur
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:59 am
Hardware configuration: openSUSE Tumbleweed, x86_64,Asrock B760M-HDV/M.2 D4, Intel Core i3-12100, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 730, NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030, Edup-Love EP-9651GS Wi-Fi Bluetooth, multicard reader USB 3.0 startech.com 35fcreadbu3, Epson XP 7100, Headset Bluetooth 3.0 Philips SHQ7300

Project 18717, WU computing delay very short

Post by promeneur »

Each time WU computing delay about Project 18717 is very short, about 1.5 days.

Every time my PC fails to finish the WU computing.

Why such a short delay ?

For all the other projects the delay is a way bigger and my PC can finish all the WU computing.
Image
kiore
Posts: 921
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by kiore »

In a positive comment for this much maligned WU my geriatric GTX 980ti which folded full time for many years and now does a couple of days a week as it now lives in a young teen's bedroom computer likes these just fine, averaging 1.3 Mppd when its general range is 1-1.5 Mppd.
Image
i7 7800x RTX 3070 OS= win10. AMD 3700x RTX 2080ti OS= win10 .

Team page: https://www.rationalskepticism.org/viewtopic.php?t=616
belloq
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2020 12:58 pm

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by belloq »

WU from this Project don't even seem to be processing on my system. I get about 800k ppd on my laptop (RTX A1000), and now it got a 18717 (29, 47, 297), and hours have gone by and GPU-Z reports nothing is happening and no progress on the WU at all. Windows Task Manager Performance tab shows 0% for CUDA. Not even sure the core was successfully launched. I need to dump this WU.
bollix47
Posts: 2957
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by bollix47 »

FYI

P18717 uses a lot of memory(~18GB), especially at the beginning during initialization. Ensure you have a pagesys file (or swap in linux) of at least 24GB. Otherwise slow or failure is what you're going to get.

I have one running now where the swap file is 24GB and it is neither slow nor is it getting "Low PPD".
promeneur
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:59 am
Hardware configuration: openSUSE Tumbleweed, x86_64,Asrock B760M-HDV/M.2 D4, Intel Core i3-12100, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 730, NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030, Edup-Love EP-9651GS Wi-Fi Bluetooth, multicard reader USB 3.0 startech.com 35fcreadbu3, Epson XP 7100, Headset Bluetooth 3.0 Philips SHQ7300

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by promeneur »

The problem for me is not that it is slow, but the delay for computing is very short. Why ?

Why it is not possible to increase the delay for computing ?

I get a 16 GB ram and 16 GB Swap partition. I will monitor this next time I get a 18717 WU.
Image
bollix47
Posts: 2957
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by bollix47 »

Sorry, but I'm not familiar with "delay for computing" but I can tell you that a 16GB swap file/partition is not enough .... my current 18717 is showing a virt memory usage of over 17GB.

Also what o/s are you using? The reason I ask is that ubuntu no longer uses a swap partition.... it uses a swap file that is located in the / folder.
belloq
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2020 12:58 pm

Re: 18717 Is Super Slow & Low PPD

Post by belloq »

bollix47 wrote: Thu May 25, 2023 9:54 am FYI

P18717 uses a lot of memory(~18GB), especially at the beginning during initialization. Ensure you have a pagesys file (or swap in linux) of at least 24GB. Otherwise slow or failure is what you're going to get.

I have one running now where the swap file is 24GB and it is neither slow nor is it getting "Low PPD".
Interesting. I'll checkout the pagesys settings.

I found that it isn't "18717" in general that is an issue, but this one specific WU. I've processed other 18717s with no problem. Here's a snippet from my log showing 18717 (10, 11, 251) getting processed no problem, but then 18717 (29, 47, 297) comes in and it never seems to get going. And I stop it a little over 3 hours of no activity.

Code: Select all

17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:Project: 18717 (Run 10, Clone 11, Gen 251)
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:Digital signatures verified
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:Folding@home GPU Core22 Folding@home Core
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:Version 0.0.20
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:  Checkpoint write interval: 250000 steps (5%) [20 total]
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:  JSON viewer frame write interval: 50000 steps (1%) [100 total]
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:  XTC frame write interval: 50000 steps (1%) [100 total]
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:  Global context and integrator variables write interval: disabled
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:There are 4 platforms available.
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:Platform 0: Reference
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:Platform 1: CPU
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:Platform 2: OpenCL
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:  opencl-device 0 specified
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:Platform 3: CUDA
17:21:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:  cuda-device 0 specified
17:21:55:WU00:FS01:0x22:Attempting to create CUDA context:
17:21:55:WU00:FS01:0x22:  Configuring platform CUDA
17:21:57:WU00:FS01:0x22:  Using CUDA and gpu 0
17:21:58:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 500000 out of 5000000 steps (10%)
17:27:18:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 550000 out of 5000000 steps (11%)
17:32:39:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 600000 out of 5000000 steps (12%)
17:38:05:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 650000 out of 5000000 steps (13%)
17:43:33:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 700000 out of 5000000 steps (14%)
17:48:55:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 750000 out of 5000000 steps (15%)
17:48:56:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 750000
17:54:17:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 800000 out of 5000000 steps (16%)
17:59:38:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 850000 out of 5000000 steps (17%)
18:04:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 900000 out of 5000000 steps (18%)
18:10:19:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 950000 out of 5000000 steps (19%)
18:15:40:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1000000 out of 5000000 steps (20%)
18:15:40:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 1000000
18:21:02:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1050000 out of 5000000 steps (21%)
18:26:28:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1100000 out of 5000000 steps (22%)
18:31:49:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1150000 out of 5000000 steps (23%)
18:37:10:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1200000 out of 5000000 steps (24%)
18:42:30:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1250000 out of 5000000 steps (25%)
18:42:31:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 1250000
18:47:55:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1300000 out of 5000000 steps (26%)
18:53:18:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1350000 out of 5000000 steps (27%)
18:58:38:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1400000 out of 5000000 steps (28%)
19:03:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1450000 out of 5000000 steps (29%)
19:09:19:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1500000 out of 5000000 steps (30%)
19:09:19:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 1500000
19:14:39:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1550000 out of 5000000 steps (31%)
19:20:00:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1600000 out of 5000000 steps (32%)
19:25:21:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1650000 out of 5000000 steps (33%)
19:30:42:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1700000 out of 5000000 steps (34%)
19:36:02:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1750000 out of 5000000 steps (35%)
19:36:03:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 1750000
19:41:23:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1800000 out of 5000000 steps (36%)
19:46:44:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1850000 out of 5000000 steps (37%)
19:52:05:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1900000 out of 5000000 steps (38%)
19:57:28:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 1950000 out of 5000000 steps (39%)
20:02:52:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2000000 out of 5000000 steps (40%)
20:02:53:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 2000000
20:08:21:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2050000 out of 5000000 steps (41%)
20:13:48:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2100000 out of 5000000 steps (42%)
20:19:16:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2150000 out of 5000000 steps (43%)
20:24:45:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2200000 out of 5000000 steps (44%)
20:30:17:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2250000 out of 5000000 steps (45%)
20:30:17:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 2250000
20:35:46:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2300000 out of 5000000 steps (46%)
20:41:14:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2350000 out of 5000000 steps (47%)
20:46:43:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2400000 out of 5000000 steps (48%)
20:52:13:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2450000 out of 5000000 steps (49%)
20:57:40:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2500000 out of 5000000 steps (50%)
20:57:41:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 2500000
21:03:11:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2550000 out of 5000000 steps (51%)
21:08:34:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2600000 out of 5000000 steps (52%)
21:13:56:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2650000 out of 5000000 steps (53%)
21:19:16:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2700000 out of 5000000 steps (54%)
21:24:40:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2750000 out of 5000000 steps (55%)
21:24:41:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 2750000
21:30:03:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2800000 out of 5000000 steps (56%)
21:35:27:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2850000 out of 5000000 steps (57%)
21:40:50:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2900000 out of 5000000 steps (58%)
21:46:10:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 2950000 out of 5000000 steps (59%)
21:51:29:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3000000 out of 5000000 steps (60%)
21:51:30:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 3000000
21:56:49:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3050000 out of 5000000 steps (61%)
22:02:10:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3100000 out of 5000000 steps (62%)
22:07:30:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3150000 out of 5000000 steps (63%)
22:12:50:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3200000 out of 5000000 steps (64%)
22:18:24:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3250000 out of 5000000 steps (65%)
22:18:24:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 3250000
22:23:49:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3300000 out of 5000000 steps (66%)
22:29:10:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3350000 out of 5000000 steps (67%)
22:34:31:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3400000 out of 5000000 steps (68%)
22:39:52:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3450000 out of 5000000 steps (69%)
22:45:13:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3500000 out of 5000000 steps (70%)
22:45:13:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 3500000
22:50:39:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3550000 out of 5000000 steps (71%)
22:55:58:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3600000 out of 5000000 steps (72%)
23:01:18:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3650000 out of 5000000 steps (73%)
23:06:38:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3700000 out of 5000000 steps (74%)
23:12:00:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3750000 out of 5000000 steps (75%)
23:12:00:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 3750000
23:17:24:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3800000 out of 5000000 steps (76%)
******************************* Date: 2023-05-24 *******************************
23:22:43:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3850000 out of 5000000 steps (77%)
23:28:03:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3900000 out of 5000000 steps (78%)
23:33:22:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 3950000 out of 5000000 steps (79%)
23:38:41:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4000000 out of 5000000 steps (80%)
23:38:42:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 4000000
23:44:01:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4050000 out of 5000000 steps (81%)
23:49:21:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4100000 out of 5000000 steps (82%)
23:54:41:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4150000 out of 5000000 steps (83%)
00:00:02:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4200000 out of 5000000 steps (84%)
00:05:22:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4250000 out of 5000000 steps (85%)
00:05:22:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 4250000
00:10:42:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4300000 out of 5000000 steps (86%)
00:16:02:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4350000 out of 5000000 steps (87%)
00:21:23:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4400000 out of 5000000 steps (88%)
00:26:43:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4450000 out of 5000000 steps (89%)
00:32:03:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4500000 out of 5000000 steps (90%)
00:32:03:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 4500000
00:37:24:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4550000 out of 5000000 steps (91%)
00:42:43:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4600000 out of 5000000 steps (92%)
00:48:05:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4650000 out of 5000000 steps (93%)
00:53:28:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4700000 out of 5000000 steps (94%)
00:58:48:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4750000 out of 5000000 steps (95%)
00:58:48:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 4750000
01:04:08:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4800000 out of 5000000 steps (96%)
01:09:28:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4850000 out of 5000000 steps (97%)
01:14:48:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4900000 out of 5000000 steps (98%)
01:20:09:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 4950000 out of 5000000 steps (99%)
01:20:10:WU01:FS01:Connecting to assign1.foldingathome.org:80
01:20:11:WU01:FS01:Assigned to work server 34.72.228.44
01:20:11:WU01:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: gpu:1:0 GA107GLM [RTX A1000 Laptop GPU] from 34.72.228.44
01:20:11:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 34.72.228.44:8080
01:20:11:WU01:FS01:Downloading 6.37MiB
01:20:12:WU01:FS01:Download complete
01:20:12:WU01:FS01:Received Unit: id:01 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:18717 run:29 clone:47 gen:297 core:0x22 unit:0x0000002f000001290000491d0000001d
01:25:30:WU00:FS01:0x22:Completed 5000000 out of 5000000 steps (100%)
01:25:30:WU00:FS01:0x22:Average performance: 26.9663 ns/day
01:25:31:WU00:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 5000000
01:25:38:WU00:FS01:0x22:Saving result file ..\logfile_01.txt
01:25:38:WU00:FS01:0x22:Saving result file checkpointIntegrator.xml.bz2
01:25:38:WU00:FS01:0x22:Saving result file checkpointState.xml.bz2
01:25:38:WU00:FS01:0x22:Saving result file positions.xtc
01:25:38:WU00:FS01:0x22:Saving result file science.log
01:25:38:WU00:FS01:0x22:Saving result file xtcAtoms.csv.bz2
01:25:38:WU00:FS01:0x22:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
01:25:39:WU00:FS01:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
01:25:39:WU00:FS01:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:18717 run:10 clone:11 gen:251 core:0x22 unit:0x0000000b000000fb0000491d0000000a
01:25:39:WU00:FS01:Uploading 10.13MiB to 34.72.228.44
01:25:39:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 34.72.228.44:8080
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:Starting
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:\ProgramData\FAHClient\cores/cores.foldingathome.org/win/64bit/22-0.0.20/Core_22.fah/FahCore_22.exe -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 706 -lifeline 24532 -checkpoint 15 -opencl-platform 0 -opencl-device 0 -cuda-device 0 -gpu-vendor nvidia -gpu 0 -gpu-usage 100
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 43288
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:Core PID:6260
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:FahCore 0x22 started
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:*********************** Log Started 2023-05-25T01:25:40Z ***********************
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:*************************** Core22 Folding@home Core ***************************
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Core: Core22
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Type: 0x22
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:    Version: 0.0.20
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:     Author: Joseph Coffland <joseph@cauldrondevelopment.com>
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:  Copyright: 2020 foldingathome.org
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Homepage: https://foldingathome.org/
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Date: Jan 20 2022
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Time: 01:15:36
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Revision: 3f211b8a4346514edbff34e3cb1c0e0ec951373c
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:     Branch: HEAD
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Compiler: Visual C++
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:    Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /wd4297 /wd4103 /O2 /Zc:throwingNew /MT
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:             -DOPENMM_VERSION="\"7.7.0\""
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Platform: win32 10
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Bits: 64
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Mode: Release
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:Maintainers: John Chodera <john.chodera@choderalab.org> and Peter Eastman
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:             <peastman@stanford.edu>
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Args: -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 706 -lifeline 43288 -checkpoint 15
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:             -opencl-platform 0 -opencl-device 0 -cuda-device 0 -gpu-vendor
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:             nvidia -gpu 0 -gpu-usage 100
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:************************************ libFAH ************************************
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Date: Jan 20 2022
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Time: 01:14:17
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Revision: 9f4ad694e75c2350d4bb6b8b5b769ba27e483a2f
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:     Branch: HEAD
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Compiler: Visual C++
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:    Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /wd4297 /wd4103 /O2 /Zc:throwingNew /MT
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Platform: win32 10
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Bits: 64
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Mode: Release
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:************************************ CBang *************************************
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Date: Jan 20 2022
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Time: 01:13:20
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Revision: ab023d155b446906d55b0f6c9a1eedeea04f7a1a
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:     Branch: HEAD
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Compiler: Visual C++
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:    Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /wd4297 /wd4103 /O2 /Zc:throwingNew /MT
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Platform: win32 10
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Bits: 64
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Mode: Release
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:************************************ System ************************************
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:        CPU: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-12800H
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:     CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 154 Stepping 3
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:       CPUs: 20
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:     Memory: 31.68GiB
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:Free Memory: 19.37GiB
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:    Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22: OS Version: 6.2
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:Has Battery: true
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22: On Battery: false
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22: UTC Offset: -7
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:        PID: 6260
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:        CWD: C:\ProgramData\FAHClient\work
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:************************************ OpenMM ************************************
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:    Version: 7.7.0
01:25:40:WU01:FS01:0x22:********************************************************************************
01:25:45:WU00:FS01:Upload 49.96%
01:25:56:WU00:FS01:Upload complete
01:25:56:WU00:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
01:25:56:WU00:FS01:Final credit estimate, 209137.00 points
01:25:56:WU00:FS01:Cleaning up
04:07:31:FS01:Paused
04:07:31:FS01:Shutting core down
04:07:32:WU01:FS01:0x22:WARNING:Console control signal 1 on PID 6260
04:07:32:WU01:FS01:0x22:Exiting, please wait. . .
04:08:21:Removing old file 'configs/config-20230514-122213.xml'
04:08:21:Saving configuration to config.xml
04:08:21:<config>
04:08:21:  <!-- Slot Control -->
04:08:21:  <power v='FULL'/>
04:08:21:
04:08:21:  <!-- User Information -->
04:08:21:  <passkey v='*****'/>
04:08:21:  <team v='259998'/>
04:08:21:  <user v='belloq'/>
04:08:21:
04:08:21:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
04:08:21:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'>
04:08:21:    <paused v='true'/>
04:08:21:  </slot>
04:08:21:  <slot id='1' type='GPU'>
04:08:21:    <paused v='true'/>
04:08:21:    <pci-bus v='1'/>
04:08:21:    <pci-slot v='0'/>
04:08:21:  </slot>
04:08:21:</config>
04:08:30:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: INTERRUPTED (102 = 0x66)
Post Reply