PPD was hard to find
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
Peter_Hucker
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2022 1:18 am
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 9 3900XT: 24 cores, 128GB RAM, 1TB NVME, 4TB HDD, R9 Nano (Fiji) GPU.
Ryzen 9 3900X: 24 cores, 64GB RAM, 250GB NVME.
Xeon X5650 dual CPU server: 24 cores, 64GB RAM, 250GB NVME, R9 290(Hawaii) GPU.
Xeon X5650 dual CPU server: 24 cores, 64GB RAM, 250GB NVME.
I3-6100: 4 cores, 32GB RAM, 250GB NVME, 2 of R9 2980X (Tahiti) GPUs.
5 other smaller computers. - Location: Scotland
Re: PPD was hard to find
Difficult to tell, depending on the project, they always varied by a factor of 2 for me. My cards are all within the range I used to see on HFM. 200-400K/day on a 280X and 400-800K/day on a Nano. Judging by the relative SP speed of your card to mine, I would expect you to get 1.75M to 3.5M. Of course newer cards maybe add a little extra in the instruction set, and Cuda might be better than OpenCL in here.