I can't imagine keeping 40 systems going, but if he's got the resources to do it with then in my mind it's still an individual. And though buying new high end gear might produce more points, the fact that people keep older gear running and being productive is a good thing IMHO. And if it's the case of a large company testing servers, the load of F@H is a great test while helping science so I can't fault that at all either. I had never thought of that angle really.Joe_H wrote:That is quite a question, and hard to answer without a lot of qualifications. I only have 2 system running currently for about 110k PPD from CPU folding only as I run OS X. But 2 people on my team are generating much more points. One has over 40 systems running, all doing CPU work, and getting about 2.5M PPD. How is one individual doing that? Well from posts of his years ago in the forum where our team originated I learned he was running a computer business and keeps F@h running on many of the machines there Would you count that as a team by itself or as an individual that just happens to have access to greater computing resources.BobWilliams757 wrote:On another note, and simply curiosity.... what is the most client any one person here has running? I know quite a few people run several machines. This question was raised in my mind when I see individual user stats with huge numbers of clients, and I have to wonder if they actually run that many systems/servers/whatever.... and who is essentially a team but listed as individuals. Not that it matters much to me, but I know some of you guys run a lot of hardware.
The other person on my team has a single PC running a CPU slot and a GPU slot with an apparent high end card, about 4.5 PPD. Definitely an individual folder.
You can find people from both types, those with just 1 or 2 machines and those with access to many. There are also organization teams/usernames that get in there. Some are easy to tell and others not. At least several corporate usernames/teams have shown up over the years using F@h to stress test new server setups. Some only fold once during a period after the servers are installed, others periodically have come back as their setups changed or new server farms were added.
What I'm speaking of is people showing hundreds of clients, that appear to be much more likely to be a team really.
I might look into some cloud folding myself. As I'm not a gamer and really have no need for higher end gear other than for folding, it might be more productive until GPU prices come down to sane again. Even when that happens, I'll have cost in setting up a new rig probably, as the computer I currently fold on is used for all our other computer needs. I doubt my wife would tolerate anything that produces much heat or noise as the primary system.gunnarre wrote:Total score: 1309941767
Total WU's: 20473
Current Rank: FAH: 1407 of 2896102. EOC: 1386 of 1730296
Years folding: 1.5 (since March 13th 2020) (e: 13th, not 15th)
Do you have dedicated 24/7 folding rigs? Not anymore, but I used to experiment with cloud folding (vast.ai, and IBM cloud) in the summer of 2020. I now only fold on my work and gaming PCs.
Approximate cost per year in gear and electricity? Heating and wear only now. If I average what I spent on cloud folding and excess electricity in 2020, it's about $260 per year.
Yes, but that site is biased towards the top folders. Teams and individuals with less contributions don't get picked up by that site.MeeLee wrote:You can find a lot of this information on extremeoverclocking.com/
That's a lot of points for such a brief period of time. I'd imagine quite a few with newer hardware fold a lot more, then the thrill wanes as upgrade time comes. It's a shame that many people just seem to "drop out" once their productivity drops in comparison to new stuff, but then again any contribution is better than none.aetch wrote:Score: Fast approaching 1.6 Billion (yes, with a B)
Work units: Roughly 16K
Rank: Yes, don't come too close unless you're wearing a gasmask or breathing apparatus, none of your N95 stuff here. Currently 1,062 (for a few weeks there I added a GTX 1080Ti in a push to get sub 1K but stopped as my rigs were producing too much heat)
See signature image for current stats.
Joined: Right after Linus Tech Tips' FAH server build went out. I'm surprised I'm still here.
Dedicated rigs: Ryzen 9 3900X, RTX 2070 SUPER. While technically this is an upgraded gaming rig I actually have other systems I can game on.
Other rigs: I sometimes experiment with other graphics cards, processors, laptops I have. After seeing some recent threads on Raspberry PIs I might dabble with that, having a small stack of 3Bs sitting.
Comments: I wish the FAH client had a testing/benchmarking mode where it could feed your system a few well worn work units, which do not contribute to any ongoing projects, to help shake your system down. Few things stress your system like FAH.
As for a testing benchmark, by far F@H has got to be one of the most brutal. When tweaking memory setting I've tried running multiple benchmarks at one time, but even doing that doesn't generate the heat or load that F@H does. A good benchmark/torture test could surely be made by capturing various F@H work units for testing. It might also be a good tool for GPU assignment for actual projects.
Thanks for all the scoop everyone. For now, having missed the decent GPU prices while I was being indecisive, I'm just going to keep folding on this little iGPU until it's not making timeouts on a regular basis. My rank is in the 45K range, and really the only progress is moving past people that have quit folding, and slowly catching up to the back of the active folders. BUT..... it's better than not folding.