Great ... thank you very muchkasson wrote:We have re-benchmarked project 5102. It is now valued at 3340 points, deadline 8 days.
5102 runing very slow
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: 5102 runing very slow
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:56 am
- Hardware configuration: ASUS P5K-E, Q6600/ 8 gig ram Win-7
2X ASUS z97-K 16 G Ram Win-7_64
Re: 5102 runing very slow
Great!, thank you for the quick response, and re-crunching the numbers.kasson wrote:We have re-benchmarked project 5102. It is now valued at 3340 points, deadline 8 days.
Now can we get greedy and ask for the extra points for the 5102's completed before today
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: 5102 runing very slow
This will never happen : as a general rule, when a WU has been credited to an Username/Teamnumber/PointValue, it will be for ever.dschief wrote:Now can we get greedy and ask for the extra points for the 5102's completed before today
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:51 pm
Re: 5102 runing very slow
I'm just happy they have re-benched and made the points realistic.toTOW wrote:This will never happen : as a general rule, when a WU has been credited to an Username/Teamnumber/PointValue, it will be for ever.dschief wrote:Now can we get greedy and ask for the extra points for the 5102's completed before today
I'm not sure when this WU was released but I don't think it's been out long so the low ppd issue has been rectified quickly (and over the weekend as it looks like a two day unit on the reference machine).
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:56 am
- Hardware configuration: ASUS P5K-E, Q6600/ 8 gig ram Win-7
2X ASUS z97-K 16 G Ram Win-7_64
Re: 5102 runing very slow
toTOW wrote:This will never happen : as a general rule, when a WU has been credited to an Username/Teamnumber/PointValue, it will be for ever.dschief wrote:Now can we get greedy and ask for the extra points for the 5102's completed before today
Your right; but I'm a shameless slut for points & had to try!
You'll note, that I did put the little Smilie face after the question
Re: 5102 runing very slow
Shameless sluts for points are accepted on this forum, especially if they smile.
Standard policy, though: Nobody gets retroactive points.
Standard policy, though: Nobody gets retroactive points.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
Re: 5102 runing very slow
thank's for having a look at this situation, and for taking the time to respond & react.
we fold for hope & hope to fold on and on....
we fold for hope & hope to fold on and on....
Re: 5102 runing very slow
Well, I'm still only getting 2/3 of what I got with 2605, but at least it isn't totally absurd anymore. Thanks.
Folding@home: 24/7
- RTX 4070 Ti
- RTX 4070 Ti
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: 5102 runing very slow
I think it's better to compare with p2665 because p2605 (or 2653) were designed for dual cores in the early days of the SMP client whereas p2665 and p5102 are new, and designed for quad cores that are most common now.
Re: 5102 runing very slow
Even a quad would still be getting less points on 5102 than even it would on the evil 2665.
If it is their wish that SMP points are cut by a third, that is fine, but I wish they would say so, instead of just having some evil work units that don't seem to jive (not even close) with the previous projects. With GPU2 ppd being so high, I question the timing of these new low point projects. Are we trying to be pushed from SMP to GPU2? If so, that's fine. I want Stanford to get what it wants, but I rather they be open about it if that is the case.
If it is their wish that SMP points are cut by a third, that is fine, but I wish they would say so, instead of just having some evil work units that don't seem to jive (not even close) with the previous projects. With GPU2 ppd being so high, I question the timing of these new low point projects. Are we trying to be pushed from SMP to GPU2? If so, that's fine. I want Stanford to get what it wants, but I rather they be open about it if that is the case.
Folding@home: 24/7
- RTX 4070 Ti
- RTX 4070 Ti
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: 5102 runing very slow
Keep in mind that this 5102 project is still using the old A1 core which doesn't scales well ...
The need of A2 core is still growing ... but it's still under development
The need of A2 core is still growing ... but it's still under development
-
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:47 pm
- Location: Colorado @ 10,000 feet
Re: 5102 runing very slow
And his machine isn't the same as the benchmark machine.toTOW wrote:Keep in mind that this 5102 project is still using the old A1 core which doesn't scales well ...
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:51 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires, ARG
Re: 5102 runing very slow
Can anyone say how large are these WUs download size and also the finished work? P2665 is something like 5Mb download and 27Mb upload.
Thanks!
Thanks!
_-_ThaNexus_-_ folding for Team Icrontic (93)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: 5102 runing very slow
I think it's only 22MB to upload on the p2665
For the p5101 : 2.8 MB to send, and 700 KB to download.
For the p5102 : 4 MB to send, and 987 KB to download.
For the p5101 : 2.8 MB to send, and 700 KB to download.
For the p5102 : 4 MB to send, and 987 KB to download.
Re: 5102 runing very slow
Project: 5102 (Run 0, Clone 109, Gen 0)
Download:
Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 987098)
Upload:
(Read 4100781 bytes from disk)
Download:
Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 987098)
Upload:
(Read 4100781 bytes from disk)