gunnarre wrote:What is the model number of that board?
What is the PCIe width of the slots? Are they all x1? If so, even replacing the CPU might not be worth it - though the GT 730 is a small GPU so it might still work: viewtopic.php?p=338263#p338263
MeeLee wrote:I've already replied multiple times to this question.
It's up to you to find and accept those settings, or just go against it.
In most cases:
PCIE 1.0 x4 / 2.0 x2 / 3.0 x1 is not recommended for folding. You could fold on it, but will experience serious PPD penalties on budget to mid range GPUs.
PCIE 1.1 x16 / 2.0 x8 / 3.0 x4, good enough for GTX 1600 series GPUs under Linux (an RTX 2060 gets 975k PPD in Linux, which is slower than a Core 21 WU), or up to a GTX 1060 in Windows.
PCIE 2.0 x16 / 3.0 x8 is good enough for up to a 2080Ti under both Linux and Windows. Estimated upcoming 5000+ shader/core gpus might be limited in Windows, but should fold fine in Linux.
PCIE 3.0 x16, there's currently no GPU that would exceed this PCIE bandwidth, but if there were, it would be a GPU with 8000 cores or more.
That info, though correct at the time, is pretty much outdated by today's standards.
It was also aimed towards the latest GTX 10 and 16 series GPUs, and RTX GPUs.
It may not be reliable info anymore, especially with the latest core updates.
The reason his system takes so long finishing WUs, is because the GPUs are not even mid-class, but budget GPUs, with limited shaders.
They might run fine on a PCIE 2.0 x1 slot,
He may want to upgrade his CPU to a Celeron dual core 4 threads though (they have em nowadays running at 3Ghz, which will make it about 4x faster), although not sure if Celeron has a CPU that runs hyperthreading with DDR3 memory.
My real advice would be to buy a modern PC, with a single RTX GPU. It'll be much faster, smaller, and consume much less power and heat.
He is using an old mining rig, and as such, old mining rigs, outdated for mining, will be even more outdated for folding, as folding requires a much faster system than mining does.