Hello everyone,
some weeks ago I noticed an issue with the timeout of project 16815 being very short, but now they have gone too far as now it shows 0 days on psummary. This doesn't make any sense and it causes rapid reassignments of the WUs in progress. I think there should be a lower limit to prevent dynamic timeout to reach zero, or am I missing something?
Cheers,
ComputerUser
Project 16815 timeout 0 days
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7927
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2 - Location: W. MA
Re: Project 16815 timeout 0 days
They are aware of the problem, it should be fixed for now.
Projects from that server were included in a test of dynamic adjustments to the timeout, the problem occurred when this project was set to not get a dynamic timeout.
Projects from that server were included in a test of dynamic adjustments to the timeout, the problem occurred when this project was set to not get a dynamic timeout.
iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:06 pm
- Hardware configuration: iMac 2017 Intel Quad-Core i5 3,4 GHz, 8 GB RAM, Radeon Pro 560 4 GB, typically with the latest macOS update. 5 Raspberry Pi 4B (2 GB).
- Location: Oberhausen, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Project 16815 timeout 0 days
The issue is back. WP 16815 (27, 551, 99) is running on my Mac right now. FAH control shows the same date/time for assigned and timeout: 2021-06-03T17:33:49Z. Also the timeout is 0 days in the project summary page.
My Raspberry Pi folding rack: http://www.anne-emscher.net/fah/
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:06 pm
- Hardware configuration: iMac 2017 Intel Quad-Core i5 3,4 GHz, 8 GB RAM, Radeon Pro 560 4 GB, typically with the latest macOS update. 5 Raspberry Pi 4B (2 GB).
- Location: Oberhausen, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Project 16815 timeout 0 days
The WP is now finished. I got 8779,2 credit points, while the base credit is 3100. So just the displayed timeout was 0 days. Points were calculated based on some timeout > 0.
https://apps.foldingathome.org/wu?p=168 ... 551&gen=99
Now it runs the next WP from project 16815 displaying a zero timeout. Some folks at home may scratch their heads if they don't find this thread.
https://apps.foldingathome.org/wu?p=168 ... 551&gen=99
Now it runs the next WP from project 16815 displaying a zero timeout. Some folks at home may scratch their heads if they don't find this thread.
My Raspberry Pi folding rack: http://www.anne-emscher.net/fah/
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7927
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2 - Location: W. MA
Re: Project 16815 timeout 0 days
It should be fixed now.
iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3