CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
Moderator: Site Moderators
Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
Is there a guide somewhere that would explain some of these extra slot options (at least the ones that are not exclusively for use by the developers/beta testers)?
Paul
Paul
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
I'm not sure, but if there is one, it hasn't been updated to include the options discussed above which have not been online for a full week yet. In that regard, we are the best source of such information.psaam0001 wrote:Is there a guide somewhere that would explain some of these extra slot options (...?
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
I understand Bruce.... There is just so much that is changing with F@H (hardware/software update wise) right now, that the guide would be needing as much TLC as the servers (and client systems) do.
Paul
Paul
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
The second last post has the list of all Slot options and the description: viewtopic.php?f=38&t=26036psaam0001 wrote:Is there a guide somewhere that would explain some of these extra slot options (at least the ones that are not exclusively for use by the developers/beta testers)?...
When it comes to FahCore_XX flags, there's isn't a single source of truth that's documented. Instead, this Forum can be used for that time period only since the idea is that FahCore_XX should run within any baby-sitting or tweaks. Thus, the flags we provide is only for workarounds until a new version is available which can fix the issue completely, thus, removing the need to document those workarounds.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
Thanks! Ill try that for the next run. (in 20 hours)gunnarre wrote: Yes. [...] go to the Slots tab, select the slot, Edit, add an "Extra slot option" called "extra-core-args" and set it to "--disable-cuda" and save the settings. This setting will apply to only that slot.
There is another point I noticed after the Core update: Power consumption.
My first thought was maybe very stressful workloads but numbers are staying the same since then.
Compared to openCL my folding rig consumes a little bit more power since using Cuda.
The system is underclocked as before.
On oCL it was folding around 680-705W.
Now, using Cuda, its more like 695-720W overall.
24/7
1x i5 3470 @2Cores
1x GTX750 (GM107)
2x GTX750Ti (GM107)
1x i5 3470 @2Cores
1x GTX750 (GM107)
2x GTX750Ti (GM107)
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
I think that 15W is well-spent.Foliant wrote:...On oCL it was folding around 680-705W.
Now, using Cuda, its more like 695-720W overall.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 7:59 pm
- Hardware configuration: Core I7 7800
4 - 2080
3 - 2080 Super
32GB ram
Ubuntu OS.
All on an EK waterblock system - Location: Austin Tx.
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
It would be more intuitive if the options were available as a drop down list.
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
TYVM for that insight.... I was just curious as to what a few of the other "work around" flags were at the moment, and what they did. However, I'm just going to use foldy's help to get me through the next day or two on the Windows 7 system, till the new HD arrives, and I can give it a new OS.The second last post has the list of all Slot options and the description: viewtopic.php?f=38&t=26036
When it comes to FahCore_XX flags, there's isn't a single source of truth that's documented. Instead, this Forum can be used for that time period only since the idea is that FahCore_XX should run within any baby-sitting or tweaks. Thus, the flags we provide is only for workarounds until a new version is available which can fix the issue completely, thus, removing the need to document those workarounds.
Paul (off topic on this thread for the last time)
-
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:01 am
- Location: Willis, Texas
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
I have a windows 10 rig with 2-1080 FE I leave run year round till winter then crank up the 1080TI. I noticed PPD went from around 800k each card to 1.2k each I have not done anything...
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
800K for 1080 Ti is low. On OpenCL, 1080 Ti is between 1.3 to 1.6 Million. On CUDA, it hovers between 2.3 to 2.6 Million
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
I think he's referring to the performance on the 1080FE not the TI.PantherX wrote:800K for 1080 Ti is low. On OpenCL, 1080 Ti is between 1.3 to 1.6 Million. On CUDA, it hovers between 2.3 to 2.6 Million
For reference, with the 149xx units my 1070's were getting over 1.2m, have just dropped back with these new 1730x units.
single 1070
-
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:01 am
- Location: Willis, Texas
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
Yes these are the very first founders edition when 1080 came out. I have 6 - 1080TI thats is my winter heat have not turned them on yet..
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
Happily got 2/2 NVIDIA carded Fedora 32 systems running on the CUDA cores. Using driver version 450.80.02.
Paul
Paul
-
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:01 am
- Location: Willis, Texas
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
Ran a 1080 TI last night just to see what it would do..
Min. Time / Frame : 00:01:01 - 2,529,052.0 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:02 - 2,468,110.3 PPD
Min. Time / Frame : 00:01:01 - 2,529,052.0 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:02 - 2,468,110.3 PPD
Re: CUDA Update to FAHCore_22
Good, that's what you can expect for a non-Moonshot work unit on CUDA. I've seen Moonshot WUs get 3M PPD on the 1080 Ti.
Online: GTX 1660 Super + occasional CPU folding in the cold.
Offline: Radeon HD 7770, GTX 1050 Ti 4G OC, RX580