I'm not sure why, but the performance on the work unit seems to be all over the place. Take, for example, my RTX 2070. It's only managing 751K PPD, when this card is capable of doing well over 1.5M PPD.
Example:
RTX 2070 (only using 60% of my GPU)
https://prnt.sc/thfxg5
Compared to WU 11748
https://prnt.sc/thfyl7
GTX 1070
https://prnt.sc/thfwl3
Wondering if there is an explanation to how/why this work unit's performance is all over the place, and is not consistent?
Poor performance on WU 13416
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
Neil-B
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
- Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21 - Location: UK
Re: Poor performance on WU 13416
There are a good few threads discussing this ... tldr: these are urgent experimental projects that are using new approaches and are being adjusted/tuned/tested on the fly (or there abouts)
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)