Comfortable Hardware Temperature
Moderator: Site Moderators
Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Please read the forum rules before posting.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 11:46 am
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
One RTX 2060 and another RTX 2060KO. They're crammed just above a power supply with a tiny WiFi card between them. When they're both running work units, one (I forget which) is always over 70C and occasionally as high as 77C. The other is at least 60C and occasionally as high as 72. Lots of case fans in a big case; I wish there were an easy way to mount the GPU cards far apart but I can't think of one. Also the Ryzen 5 1600AF usually has 10 threads running a work unit and two to tend to the GPUs, stock AMD cooler that came with it, around 60C I think but could be higher.
I'm a bit worried about all this but only a bit. If they die, they die. Still haven't seen a full month's power bill and I expect this whole thing is using 12 kWh a day. I believe I'm paying US$0.10/kWh for what's probably from the local nuke plant...
I'm a bit worried about all this but only a bit. If they die, they die. Still haven't seen a full month's power bill and I expect this whole thing is using 12 kWh a day. I believe I'm paying US$0.10/kWh for what's probably from the local nuke plant...
-
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 1:20 am
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
Recently, I've noticed a relationship between GPU clock speed and a few degrees temperature change on my GTX 1650 Super.
With the fan in auto speed mode, which stays at 25-35% fan speed, the GPU temp fluctuates between 57-62C but mostly stays around 60C. The clock runs at 1905 MHz in this temp range.
When I set the fan speed manually as high as 50%, the GPU clock increases to 1920 MHz and the temp stays in the 55-60C range.
With the fan speed at 55% or higher, the clock increases to 1935 MHz and temp stays under 55C. The speed does not increase beyond 1935 MHz even with the fan at higher speeds.
This appears to be NVIDIA's GPU Boost 3.0 feature adjusting the clock in 15 MHz increments. When testing the fan speed changes, it always takes a few minutes for the temp to stabilize before it will boost the clock.
Even though this is only about a 1.5% increase, it's a safe way to boost speed without risking bad work unit errors from regular overclocking.
With the fan in auto speed mode, which stays at 25-35% fan speed, the GPU temp fluctuates between 57-62C but mostly stays around 60C. The clock runs at 1905 MHz in this temp range.
When I set the fan speed manually as high as 50%, the GPU clock increases to 1920 MHz and the temp stays in the 55-60C range.
With the fan speed at 55% or higher, the clock increases to 1935 MHz and temp stays under 55C. The speed does not increase beyond 1935 MHz even with the fan at higher speeds.
This appears to be NVIDIA's GPU Boost 3.0 feature adjusting the clock in 15 MHz increments. When testing the fan speed changes, it always takes a few minutes for the temp to stabilize before it will boost the clock.
Even though this is only about a 1.5% increase, it's a safe way to boost speed without risking bad work unit errors from regular overclocking.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2020 11:11 pm
- Hardware configuration: 2,3 GHz Dual-Core Intel Core i5 Mac OS
- Location: Brasília, DF, Brazil
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
I am doing this on my Mac, I am not sure how big of a difference it makes for my CPU.bikeaddict wrote:Even though this is only about a 1.5% increase, it's a safe way to boost speed without risking bad work unit errors from regular overclocking.
Creator, Owner, and administrator of team Seriös.
https://stats.foldingathome.org/donor/NunoReifschneider
https://stats.foldingathome.org/team/264998
https://stats.foldingathome.org/donor/NunoReifschneider
https://stats.foldingathome.org/team/264998
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7937
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2 - Location: W. MA
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
iMac CPUs are desktop models, the GPUs have been mobile chip based. Some CPUs even have been on socketed logic boards potentially allowing for a CPU upgrade for those willing to do the disassembly needed to get there. Have not checked the GPUs for the latest high end iMac's or the iMac Pros.NRT_AntiKytherA wrote:Amusingly it's hotter here in North Wales today than it is in Brasilia, I only looked because of that Core i5's temperature. However, it's an iMac (all-in-one?) according to NBR's profile so no doubt has a laptop processor and cooling system.
iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2020 11:50 pm
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
They are still essentially a desktop replacement laptop bolted to the rear of a screen and share many of the same cooling compromises. So using an i5 or i7 from the extensive range available with a high TJunction value is to be expected.
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2020 2:38 pm
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
So long as it is below the limit specified by the manufacturer (and above the dew point technically), the processor should be fine for a long period of time. As far as GPUs are concerned, a fan will probably fail before the silicon and the motherboard, PSU, or RAM will probably fail before a CPU. The exception is if you have an amazing cooling solution and are overvolting. In that case, you could be operating within the "safe" temperatures I mentioned, but have enough current to cause electromigration within the processor. Best case scenario, this will cause increased resistance across the internal circuits, therefore requiring higher and higher voltages over time to maintain the same clock rates, until eventually it will no longer be stable at any voltage or clock rate.
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2020 11:50 pm
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
There's also the issue of M.2 slots for nvme drives in close proximity to PCI-E slots on motherboards. Anything over 55C is flagged as too hot for an EVO 970 for example by Samsung Magician software. They use PCI-E bus so the circuit layout partly dictates the location just as much as the required footprint but it's really a stupid place to have the drive when a high-end GPU is spewing out hot air onto that area. Unless you have decent cooling and no cables fouling air flow, you better be prepared for a slow performing and early failing nvme drive.
Before anyone says fit a heat spreader, they are next to useless. It's actually better to have direct airflow over the nvme rather than a lump of metal covering the chips on the drive absorbing more heat from the surrounding components.
Before anyone says fit a heat spreader, they are next to useless. It's actually better to have direct airflow over the nvme rather than a lump of metal covering the chips on the drive absorbing more heat from the surrounding components.
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
Depends.
I've done a test on one of the TV boxes I own, and the bare chip gets hot really quickly (80C).
The factory cooling solution was a thick thermal pad, with a steel plate doing the cooling.
Reached perhaps 2-5C lower.
I replaced it with sticking on a cheap heat sink you can find on Amazon.
Results between the 'thermal tape sticky heat sinks', and a 'bare heat sink, using dual-sided tape' where identical. Temps dropped by over 10C.
And of course, a small fan added a lot more cooling.
A lot of people stick heat sinks on their SSDs for best cooling. Especially on the controller chip. The memory modules don't really get that hot.
I've done a test on one of the TV boxes I own, and the bare chip gets hot really quickly (80C).
The factory cooling solution was a thick thermal pad, with a steel plate doing the cooling.
Reached perhaps 2-5C lower.
I replaced it with sticking on a cheap heat sink you can find on Amazon.
Results between the 'thermal tape sticky heat sinks', and a 'bare heat sink, using dual-sided tape' where identical. Temps dropped by over 10C.
And of course, a small fan added a lot more cooling.
A lot of people stick heat sinks on their SSDs for best cooling. Especially on the controller chip. The memory modules don't really get that hot.
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:24 am
- Hardware configuration: Rig1 (Dedicated SMP): AMD Phenom II X6 1100T, Gigabyte GA-880GMA-USB3 board, 8 GB Kingston 1333 DDR3 Ram, Seasonic S12 II 380 Watt PSU, Noctua CPU Cooler
Rig2 (Part-Time GPU): Intel Q6600, Gigabyte 965P-S3 Board, EVGA 460 GTX Graphics, 8 GB Kingston 800 DDR2 Ram, Seasonic Gold X-650 PSU, Artic Cooling Freezer 7 CPU Cooler - Location: United States
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
I run my GPUs up to 85, no problems in my multi GPU rig (4 blower style cards in one tower). CPU is typically 50-60, but up to 95 overclocked. Still no problems...the constant load of F@h is better than things that thermally cycle the chips. The cycling causes more stress.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 9:18 pm
- Hardware configuration: Luna-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ stock | Noctua NH-U9s with 2 Noctua B9 Redux 1600 92mm Fans
MSI B450 Tomahawk Max Revision 1.0 BIOS version 3.F0
Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x8GB DDR4-3000 | Timings 16-18-18-36
Sapphire Radeon RX 590 Nitro+ 8GB
SeaSonic M12II 850w 80+Bronze PSU
Terra-
Intel Core i5-4690K @ 4.20GHz with Vcore of 1.138v | Corsair H100i V2 with 2 Corsair SP120 120mm fans
Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H BIOS version 10b
Crucial Ballistix Sport 2x4GB DDR3-1600 | Timings 9-9-9-24
Sapphire Radeon RX 570 Pulse 4GB -100mV undervolt
OCZ Technology ZS Series 550w 80+Bronze PSU
Anubis-
Intel Core i7-5820K @3.80GHz with Vcore of 1.089v | Cooler Master Hyper 212 with Noctua NF-F12 120mm IPPC 3000 fan
Gigabyte X99-SOC Champion BIOS version F23c
G.Skill Trident Z RGB 2x8GB DDR4-3000 @ 2400 | Timings 15-15-15-36
Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB -25mV undervolt
SeaSonic Prime Platinum 750w 80+Platinum PSU
All machines running F@H v7.6.21 - Location: Lincolnshire, UK
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
Nice, got any pictures also what kind of PPD are you getting with that setup?Paragon wrote:I run my GPUs up to 85, no problems in my multi GPU rig (4 blower style cards in one tower). CPU is typically 50-60, but up to 95 overclocked. Still no problems...the constant load of F@h is better than things that thermally cycle the chips. The cycling causes more stress.
Do you even fold bro?
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:24 am
- Hardware configuration: Rig1 (Dedicated SMP): AMD Phenom II X6 1100T, Gigabyte GA-880GMA-USB3 board, 8 GB Kingston 1333 DDR3 Ram, Seasonic S12 II 380 Watt PSU, Noctua CPU Cooler
Rig2 (Part-Time GPU): Intel Q6600, Gigabyte 965P-S3 Board, EVGA 460 GTX Graphics, 8 GB Kingston 800 DDR2 Ram, Seasonic Gold X-650 PSU, Artic Cooling Freezer 7 CPU Cooler - Location: United States
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
Ha! you would laugh if you saw this build. It's intent wasn't so much for PPD but for making heat for my house in the winter (we have solar panels so I wanted to build a solar powered folding at home computer space heater). I am working on an article on this for my blog.FireFox-89 wrote:Nice, got any pictures also what kind of PPD are you getting with that setup?Paragon wrote:I run my GPUs up to 85, no problems in my multi GPU rig (4 blower style cards in one tower). CPU is typically 50-60, but up to 95 overclocked. Still no problems...the constant load of F@h is better than things that thermally cycle the chips. The cycling causes more stress.
Basically, this machine is an old nForce 680i EVGA board that has 3 PCI-E X-16 slots and one PCI-E X1 slot. I am running two old GTX 480 (fermi based) cards and a GTX580 in the X16 slots, and am using a riser extension to mount a GTX460 off the X1 slot (installed it with a custom bracket I made out of velcro and an old CD drive). So three of these cards dump heat out the back, one dumps heat out the drive bay. This is powered by a Core2Quad Q6600 to have one dedicated CPU core per GPU. It's got 4GB of DDR2 ram and is running Ubuntu. It's got a 1300 watt Seasonic power supply in it.
Average power consumption when folding full-tilt is 980 watts, measured at the wall. This makes it a pretty good space heater...I control the heat output by switching on and off the GPUs remotely using Teamviewer. Since this is running really old hardware, the efficiency is terrible...total PPD on the system is about 50K, so 50,000 PPD / 1000 watts = 50 PPD/Watt. Not so good.
The cool thing is, this entire machine and these GPUs were obtained for less than $150. This is stuff that was otherwise destined for the land fill. Instead of me using a conventional 1500 watt resisitive heat space heater in the winter, I can run this thing, and convert solar energy from my roof to heat for the room, while doing a small amount of science at the same time.
I have some pictures, as well as thermal images from my FLIR camera that are really awesome. I'm writing up that blog post so I'll link it up when it's finished.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 9:18 pm
- Hardware configuration: Luna-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ stock | Noctua NH-U9s with 2 Noctua B9 Redux 1600 92mm Fans
MSI B450 Tomahawk Max Revision 1.0 BIOS version 3.F0
Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x8GB DDR4-3000 | Timings 16-18-18-36
Sapphire Radeon RX 590 Nitro+ 8GB
SeaSonic M12II 850w 80+Bronze PSU
Terra-
Intel Core i5-4690K @ 4.20GHz with Vcore of 1.138v | Corsair H100i V2 with 2 Corsair SP120 120mm fans
Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H BIOS version 10b
Crucial Ballistix Sport 2x4GB DDR3-1600 | Timings 9-9-9-24
Sapphire Radeon RX 570 Pulse 4GB -100mV undervolt
OCZ Technology ZS Series 550w 80+Bronze PSU
Anubis-
Intel Core i7-5820K @3.80GHz with Vcore of 1.089v | Cooler Master Hyper 212 with Noctua NF-F12 120mm IPPC 3000 fan
Gigabyte X99-SOC Champion BIOS version F23c
G.Skill Trident Z RGB 2x8GB DDR4-3000 @ 2400 | Timings 15-15-15-36
Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB -25mV undervolt
SeaSonic Prime Platinum 750w 80+Platinum PSU
All machines running F@H v7.6.21 - Location: Lincolnshire, UK
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:24 am
- Hardware configuration: Rig1 (Dedicated SMP): AMD Phenom II X6 1100T, Gigabyte GA-880GMA-USB3 board, 8 GB Kingston 1333 DDR3 Ram, Seasonic S12 II 380 Watt PSU, Noctua CPU Cooler
Rig2 (Part-Time GPU): Intel Q6600, Gigabyte 965P-S3 Board, EVGA 460 GTX Graphics, 8 GB Kingston 800 DDR2 Ram, Seasonic Gold X-650 PSU, Artic Cooling Freezer 7 CPU Cooler - Location: United States
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
Here you go...I'll throw a thread in the hardware forums on this as well
https://greenfoldingathome.com/2020/05/ ... u-want-to/
https://greenfoldingathome.com/2020/05/ ... u-want-to/
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 9:18 pm
- Hardware configuration: Luna-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ stock | Noctua NH-U9s with 2 Noctua B9 Redux 1600 92mm Fans
MSI B450 Tomahawk Max Revision 1.0 BIOS version 3.F0
Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x8GB DDR4-3000 | Timings 16-18-18-36
Sapphire Radeon RX 590 Nitro+ 8GB
SeaSonic M12II 850w 80+Bronze PSU
Terra-
Intel Core i5-4690K @ 4.20GHz with Vcore of 1.138v | Corsair H100i V2 with 2 Corsair SP120 120mm fans
Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H BIOS version 10b
Crucial Ballistix Sport 2x4GB DDR3-1600 | Timings 9-9-9-24
Sapphire Radeon RX 570 Pulse 4GB -100mV undervolt
OCZ Technology ZS Series 550w 80+Bronze PSU
Anubis-
Intel Core i7-5820K @3.80GHz with Vcore of 1.089v | Cooler Master Hyper 212 with Noctua NF-F12 120mm IPPC 3000 fan
Gigabyte X99-SOC Champion BIOS version F23c
G.Skill Trident Z RGB 2x8GB DDR4-3000 @ 2400 | Timings 15-15-15-36
Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB -25mV undervolt
SeaSonic Prime Platinum 750w 80+Platinum PSU
All machines running F@H v7.6.21 - Location: Lincolnshire, UK
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
Haha that is awesomeParagon wrote:Here you go...I'll throw a thread in the hardware forums on this as well
https://greenfoldingathome.com/2020/05/ ... u-want-to/
Do you even fold bro?
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2020 11:50 pm
Re: Comfortable Hardware Temperature
that dust cake , my main folding system (also primarily my gaming rig) is a nice space heater even at 380W power consumption which can get annoying in the Summer but is fantastic over Winter. I clean out my systems every 12 months even though I have an air purifier plus they have both the standard washable mesh and/or expanded polyurethane vacuum motor dust filters on all openings because finer lint still finds a way in eventually. I tried using HEPA style but it restricted the airflow too much, so I use vacuum cleaner motor filter material instead. Without all that I'd clean it out every 6 months to avoid the evil dust bunnies leaving their droppings everywhere and baking those GPU and CPU heat sink cakes.
Nice write up though and good to see kit avoiding landfill being put to a useful purpose other than just heating your room
Nice write up though and good to see kit avoiding landfill being put to a useful purpose other than just heating your room