Shorter WUs possible

If you're new to FAH and need help getting started or you have very basic questions, start here.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Mortivor_81
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2020 8:49 am

Shorter WUs possible

Post by Mortivor_81 »

Hi there,

I'm releatively new to F@H (I registered a few days ago). At the moment, I receive Work-Units which each have a ETA of around 2 - 2.5 days while the deadline in most cases is around 5 days in the future. Since I don't have the most recent hardware (Core i5 m430) and do not run my pc for multiple hourse per day I wonder if it's possible to get shorter Work-Units, maybe with an ETA of at most a day. The would fit much better for "folding in spare (idle) time".
JimboPalmer
Posts: 2522
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:12 am
Location: Greenwood MS USA

Re: Shorter WUs possible

Post by JimboPalmer »

I see two issues:

F@H really wants you to fold 24/7 as a project can't proceed until all existing Work Units are received back at the servers. So days later is slowing, rather than speeding up the search for a treatment.

Since the middle of March the servers have been hammered by about 10 times as many volunteers. Cutting Work Units in half would require twice as many servers to get the same work done.

Sorry.
Tsar of all the Rushers
I tried to remain childlike, all I achieved was childish.
A friend to those who want no friends
emf
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:35 pm

Re: Shorter WUs possible

Post by emf »

It actually seems like they've been making the WU's larger lately; my guess is to spread out the network load on the work servers.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Shorter WUs possible

Post by bruce »

When you say WUs are getting larger, you might mean that the number of atoms is increasing. That's driven entirely by science. You can't simulate half a protein and you have to simulate it in a suitable volume of solvent. Larger proteins take much longer to simulate each step or each nanosecond.

When you say WUs are getting larger, you might mean they run longer. The number of steps per WU can be adjusted by the project owner. Typically, a project with lots of atoms will receive a reduced number of steps per WU. which means it takes more WUs to create the same trajectory length.
HugoNotte
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:09 pm

Re: Shorter WUs possible

Post by HugoNotte »

Mortivor_81 wrote:Hi there,

I'm releatively new to F@H (I registered a few days ago). At the moment, I receive Work-Units which each have a ETA of around 2 - 2.5 days while the deadline in most cases is around 5 days in the future. Since I don't have the most recent hardware (Core i5 m430) and do not run my pc for multiple hourse per day I wonder if it's possible to get shorter Work-Units, maybe with an ETA of at most a day. The would fit much better for "folding in spare (idle) time".
Don't mean to chase you away from FAH, but as mentioned before, the best way of contributing is 24/7 folding. The work servers would already assign the lightest work units available in order to match your hardware.
If you want to contribute to science but are unable or not willing to fold 24/7, have you considered signing up with Rosetta@home via BOINC? Their deadlines are much longer usually and the entire setup seems more suitable for part time folders.

The way FAH projects are structured, WUs need to be returned as quickly as possible since the following generation of WUs, bringing the project forward, depends on the previous gen outcome.
Post Reply