GPU WUs giving base points?

If you think it might be a driver problem, see viewforum.php?f=79

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Doctrinaire
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:28 am
Hardware configuration: Windows 10 x64-bit
F@H client: V7.5.1

Intel i5-7600k
AMD MSI RX 480 Gaming X 8gb
Location: Illinois, USA

GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by Doctrinaire »

Hello forum.

I've only been on F@H for about a week now. Was first brought to try it out and help contribute courteous to Linus Tech Tips.

Anyway onto my question. Currently I'm at 40 WUs completed with a total points of 104,028 and most of the time i'm running only GPU assignments. I do have a passkey that i got sometime before or just after the 10 WU minimum before it starts to give out the bonus. Although, my problems is that for most all of my completed WUs, i'm getting only base points.

Here's an example of my last WU. (p.s. feel free to let me know how to correctly show Log file text)

Code: Select all

00:53:11:WU01:FS01:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR[u][b] project:11761 [/b][/u]run:0 clone:10839 gen:22 core:0x22 unit:0x0000002b80fccb0a5e70ef0a2756be4a
00:53:12:WU01:FS01:Uploading 23.04MiB to 128.252.203.10
00:53:12:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 128.252.203.10:8080
00:53:16:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 65.254.110.245:8080
00:53:16:WARNING:WU00:FS01:Failed to get assignment from '65.254.110.245:8080': No WUs available for this configuration
00:53:16:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 18.218.241.186:80
00:53:16:WARNING:WU00:FS01:Failed to get assignment from '18.218.241.186:80': No WUs available for this configuration
00:53:16:ERROR:WU00:FS01:Exception: Could not get an assignment
00:53:27:WU01:FS01:Upload 0.27%
00:54:29:WU01:FS01:Upload 1.36%
00:54:35:WU01:FS01:Upload 7.59%
00:54:41:WU01:FS01:Upload 13.29%
00:54:47:WU01:FS01:Upload 19.26%
00:54:53:WU01:FS01:Upload 25.22%
00:54:59:WU01:FS01:Upload 31.19%
00:55:05:WU01:FS01:Upload 37.43%
00:55:11:WU01:FS01:Upload 43.94%
00:55:17:WU01:FS01:Upload 48.55%
00:55:23:WU01:FS01:Upload 54.25%
00:55:29:WU01:FS01:Upload 60.21%
00:55:35:WU01:FS01:Upload 65.37%
00:55:41:WU01:FS01:Upload 71.33%
00:55:47:WU01:FS01:Upload 77.57%
00:55:53:WU01:FS01:Upload 83.54%
00:55:53:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 65.254.110.245:8080
00:55:53:WARNING:WU00:FS01:Failed to get assignment from '65.254.110.245:8080': No WUs available for this configuration
00:55:53:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 18.218.241.186:80
00:55:54:WARNING:WU00:FS01:Failed to get assignment from '18.218.241.186:80': No WUs available for this configuration
00:55:54:ERROR:WU00:FS01:Exception: Could not get an assignment
00:55:59:WU01:FS01:Upload 88.69%
00:56:05:WU01:FS01:Upload 94.93%
00:56:12:WU01:FS01:Upload complete
00:56:12:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
00:56:12:WU01:FS01:Final credit estimate,[b][u] 60471.00 points[/u][/b]
00:56:12:WU01:FS01:Cleaning up

Before it completed the upload I had 93,000 something, and afterwards i'm now at 104,028. The base points for the WU 11761 showed 9400. Looking in the log shows it took about 3hrs 10 mins. Is this normal or am i getting only base points for some reason, ie no bonus??

My current setup is an I5-7600k and a MSI RX 480 gaming X 8gb

Mod Edit: Added Code Tags - PantherX
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by PantherX »

Welcome to the F@H Forum Doctrinaire,

It seems that some WUs are getting bonus while others aren't: https://apps.foldingathome.org/cpu?q=Doctrinaire

Can you please post your log file. Ensure that you have copied the System configuration which is present at the start of the log file: viewtopic.php?f=74&t=26036 :)
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Doctrinaire
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:28 am
Hardware configuration: Windows 10 x64-bit
F@H client: V7.5.1

Intel i5-7600k
AMD MSI RX 480 Gaming X 8gb
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by Doctrinaire »

Ignore the upload, that was a previous WU.

Code: Select all

21:25:38:WU01:FS01:Starting
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:\Users\bergs\AppData\Roaming\FAHClient\cores/cores.foldingathome.org/v7/win/64bit/Core_22.fah/FahCore_22.exe -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 705 -lifeline 5680 -checkpoint 30 -gpu-vendor amd -opencl-platform 0 -opencl-device 0 -gpu 0
21:25:38:WU00:FS01:Upload 15.40%
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 2764
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:Core PID:9416
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:FahCore 0x22 started
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:*********************** Log Started 2020-04-14T21:25:38Z ***********************
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:*************************** Core22 Folding@home Core ***************************
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Type: 0x22
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Core: Core22
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:    Website: https://foldingathome.org/
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:  Copyright: (c) 2009-2018 foldingathome.org
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:     Author: John Chodera <john.chodera@choderalab.org> and Rafal Wiewiora
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:             <rafal.wiewiora@choderalab.org>
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Args: -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 705 -lifeline 2764 -checkpoint 30
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:             -gpu-vendor amd -opencl-platform 0 -opencl-device 0 -gpu 0
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:     Config: <none>
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:************************************ Build *************************************
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:    Version: 0.0.2
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Date: Dec 6 2019
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Time: 21:30:31
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22: Repository: Git
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Revision: abeb39247cc72df5af0f63723edafadb23d5dfbe
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:     Branch: HEAD
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Compiler: Visual C++ 2008
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:    Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /wd4297 /wd4103 /Ox /MT
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:   Platform: win32 10
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Bits: 64
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:       Mode: Release
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:************************************ System ************************************
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:        CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7600K CPU @ 3.80GHz
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:     CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 9
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:       CPUs: 4
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:     Memory: 15.93GiB
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Free Memory: 10.07GiB
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:    Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22: OS Version: 6.2
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Has Battery: false
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22: On Battery: false
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22: UTC Offset: -5
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:        PID: 9416
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:        CWD: C:\Users\bergs\AppData\Roaming\FAHClient\work
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:         OS: Windows 10 Home
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:    OS Arch: AMD64
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:********************************************************************************
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Project: 11761 (Run 0, Clone 10839, Gen 22)
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Unit: 0x0000002b80fccb0a5e70ef0a2756be4a
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Reading tar file core.xml
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Reading tar file integrator.xml
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Reading tar file state.xml
21:25:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Reading tar file system.xml
21:25:39:WU01:FS01:0x22:Digital signatures verified
21:25:39:WU01:FS01:0x22:Folding@home GPU Core22 Folding@home Core
21:25:39:WU01:FS01:0x22:Version 0.0.2
21:25:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 0 out of 2000000 steps (0%)21:25:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Temperature control disabled. Requirements: single Nvidia GPU, tmax must be < 110 and twait >= 900
21:26:00:WU00:FS01:Upload 15.64%
21:26:00:WARNING:WU00:FS01:Exception: Failed to send results to work server: Transfer failed
21:26:00:WU00:FS01:Trying to send results to collection server
21:26:00:WU00:FS01:Uploading 131.49MiB to 52.224.109.74
21:26:00:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 52.224.109.74:8080
21:26:00:ERROR:WU00:FS01:Exception: Transfer failed
21:27:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 20000 out of 2000000 steps (1%)
21:28:49:WU00:FS01:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:14417 run:0 clone:455 gen:8 core:0x22 unit:0x0000000e0d5262775e84c8a6060ce321
21:28:49:WU00:FS01:Uploading 131.49MiB to 13.82.98.119
21:28:49:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 13.82.98.119:8080
21:28:55:WU00:FS01:Upload 0.67%
21:29:01:WU00:FS01:Upload 1.62%
21:29:07:WU00:FS01:Upload 2.14%
21:29:13:WU00:FS01:Upload 2.61%
21:29:19:WU00:FS01:Upload 3.33%
21:29:25:WU00:FS01:Upload 4.14%
21:29:31:WU00:FS01:Upload 5.13%
21:29:42:WU00:FS01:Upload 5.47%
21:29:42:WARNING:WU00:FS01:Exception: Failed to send results to work server: Transfer failed
21:29:42:WU00:FS01:Trying to send results to collection server
21:29:42:WU00:FS01:Uploading 131.49MiB to 52.224.109.74
21:29:42:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 52.224.109.74:8080
21:29:42:ERROR:WU00:FS01:Exception: Transfer failed
21:29:44:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 40000 out of 2000000 steps (2%)
21:31:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 60000 out of 2000000 steps (3%)
21:33:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 80000 out of 2000000 steps (4%)
21:35:45:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 100000 out of 2000000 steps (5%)
21:37:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 120000 out of 2000000 steps (6%)
21:39:47:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 140000 out of 2000000 steps (7%)
21:39:54:WU00:FS01:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:14417 run:0 clone:455 gen:8 core:0x22 unit:0x0000000e0d5262775e84c8a6060ce321
21:39:54:WU00:FS01:Uploading 131.49MiB to 13.82.98.119
21:39:54:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 13.82.98.119:8080
21:40:00:WU00:FS01:Upload 0.71%
21:40:06:WU00:FS01:Upload 1.85%
21:40:12:WU00:FS01:Upload 2.80%
21:40:18:WU00:FS01:Upload 3.90%
21:40:24:WU00:FS01:Upload 4.85%
21:40:30:WU00:FS01:Upload 5.85%
21:40:36:WU00:FS01:Upload 6.89%
21:40:42:WU00:FS01:Upload 7.70%
21:40:48:WU00:FS01:Upload 8.70%
21:40:54:WU00:FS01:Upload 9.74%
21:41:00:WU00:FS01:Upload 10.84%
21:41:06:WU00:FS01:Upload 11.88%
21:41:12:WU00:FS01:Upload 12.88%
21:41:18:WU00:FS01:Upload 13.69%
21:41:24:WU00:FS01:Upload 14.69%
21:41:30:WU00:FS01:Upload 15.64%
21:41:36:WU00:FS01:Upload 16.64%
21:41:42:WU00:FS01:Upload 17.16%
21:41:48:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 160000 out of 2000000 steps (8%)
21:41:48:WU00:FS01:Upload 17.78%
21:41:54:WU00:FS01:Upload 18.20%
21:42:00:WU00:FS01:Upload 18.63%
21:42:06:WU00:FS01:Upload 19.39%
21:42:12:WU00:FS01:Upload 20.44%
21:42:18:WU00:FS01:Upload 21.34%
21:42:24:WU00:FS01:Upload 22.39%
21:42:30:WU00:FS01:Upload 23.39%
21:42:36:WU00:FS01:Upload 24.34%
21:42:42:WU00:FS01:Upload 25.29%
21:42:48:WU00:FS01:Upload 26.09%
21:42:54:WU00:FS01:Upload 27.09%
21:43:00:WU00:FS01:Upload 27.76%
21:43:06:WU00:FS01:Upload 28.90%
21:43:12:WU00:FS01:Upload 30.04%
21:43:18:WU00:FS01:Upload 30.99%
21:43:24:WU00:FS01:Upload 31.99%
21:43:30:WU00:FS01:Upload 32.99%
21:43:36:WU00:FS01:Upload 34.08%
21:43:42:WU00:FS01:Upload 35.13%
21:43:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 180000 out of 2000000 steps (9%)
21:43:48:WU00:FS01:Upload 36.12%
21:43:54:WU00:FS01:Upload 37.17%
21:44:00:WU00:FS01:Upload 37.93%
21:44:08:WU00:FS01:Upload 38.64%
21:44:14:WU00:FS01:Upload 39.74%
21:44:20:WU00:FS01:Upload 40.88%
21:44:26:WU00:FS01:Upload 41.97%
21:44:32:WU00:FS01:Upload 43.02%
21:44:38:WU00:FS01:Upload 44.16%
21:44:44:WU00:FS01:Upload 45.30%
21:44:53:WU00:FS01:Upload 45.39%
21:44:59:WU00:FS01:Upload 45.68%
21:45:05:WU00:FS01:Upload 46.53%
21:45:11:WU00:FS01:Upload 47.63%
21:45:17:WU00:FS01:Upload 48.62%
21:45:23:WU00:FS01:Upload 49.67%
21:45:29:WU00:FS01:Upload 50.76%
21:45:35:WU00:FS01:Upload 51.76%
21:45:41:WU00:FS01:Upload 52.90%
21:45:41:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 200000 out of 2000000 steps (10%)
21:45:47:WU00:FS01:Upload 54.00%
21:45:53:WU00:FS01:Upload 55.14%
21:45:59:WU00:FS01:Upload 56.28%
21:46:05:WU00:FS01:Upload 57.37%
21:46:11:WU00:FS01:Upload 58.37%
21:46:17:WU00:FS01:Upload 59.41%
21:46:23:WU00:FS01:Upload 60.55%
21:46:29:WU00:FS01:Upload 61.70%
21:46:35:WU00:FS01:Upload 62.79%
21:46:41:WU00:FS01:Upload 63.93%
21:46:47:WU00:FS01:Upload 64.59%
21:46:53:WU00:FS01:Upload 65.64%
21:46:59:WU00:FS01:Upload 66.73%
21:47:05:WU00:FS01:Upload 67.83%
21:47:11:WU00:FS01:Upload 68.44%
21:47:17:WU00:FS01:Upload 69.11%
21:47:23:WU00:FS01:Upload 69.63%
21:47:29:WU00:FS01:Upload 70.01%
21:47:35:WU00:FS01:Upload 71.06%
21:47:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 220000 out of 2000000 steps (11%)
21:47:41:WU00:FS01:Upload 72.15%
21:47:47:WU00:FS01:Upload 73.29%
21:47:53:WU00:FS01:Upload 74.39%
21:47:59:WU00:FS01:Upload 75.48%
21:48:05:WU00:FS01:Upload 76.57%
21:48:11:WU00:FS01:Upload 77.71%
21:48:17:WU00:FS01:Upload 78.81%
21:48:23:WU00:FS01:Upload 79.95%
21:48:29:WU00:FS01:Upload 81.09%
21:48:35:WU00:FS01:Upload 82.23%
21:48:41:WU00:FS01:Upload 83.32%
21:48:47:WU00:FS01:Upload 84.37%
21:48:57:WU00:FS01:Upload 85.37%
21:49:03:WU00:FS01:Upload 86.46%
21:49:09:WU00:FS01:Upload 86.93%
21:49:15:WU00:FS01:Upload 87.98%
21:49:21:WU00:FS01:Upload 89.12%
21:49:27:WU00:FS01:Upload 90.12%
21:49:33:WU00:FS01:Upload 91.21%
21:49:34:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 240000 out of 2000000 steps (12%)
21:49:39:WU00:FS01:Upload 92.31%
21:49:49:WU00:FS01:Upload 93.40%
21:49:57:WU00:FS01:Upload 93.68%
21:50:03:WU00:FS01:Upload 94.16%
21:50:09:WU00:FS01:Upload 95.20%
21:50:34:WU00:FS01:Upload 95.63%
21:50:34:WARNING:WU00:FS01:Exception: Failed to send results to work server: Transfer failed
21:50:34:WU00:FS01:Trying to send results to collection server
21:50:34:WU00:FS01:Uploading 131.49MiB to 52.224.109.74
21:50:34:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 52.224.109.74:8080
21:50:35:ERROR:WU00:FS01:Exception: Transfer failed
21:51:34:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 260000 out of 2000000 steps (13%)
21:53:33:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 280000 out of 2000000 steps (14%)
21:55:30:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 300000 out of 2000000 steps (15%)
21:57:31:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 320000 out of 2000000 steps (16%)
21:57:51:WU00:FS01:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:14417 run:0 clone:455 gen:8 core:0x22 unit:0x0000000e0d5262775e84c8a6060ce321
21:57:51:WU00:FS01:Uploading 131.49MiB to 13.82.98.119
21:57:51:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 13.82.98.119:8080
21:57:57:WU00:FS01:Upload 0.95%
21:58:03:WU00:FS01:Upload 1.57%
21:58:09:WU00:FS01:Upload 2.33%
21:58:15:WU00:FS01:Upload 2.95%
21:58:21:WU00:FS01:Upload 3.95%
21:58:27:WU00:FS01:Upload 5.13%
21:58:33:WU00:FS01:Upload 6.23%
21:58:39:WU00:FS01:Upload 7.27%
21:58:45:WU00:FS01:Upload 8.37%
21:58:51:WU00:FS01:Upload 9.46%
21:59:00:WU00:FS01:Upload 9.74%
21:59:08:WU00:FS01:Upload 10.36%
21:59:14:WU00:FS01:Upload 11.45%
21:59:20:WU00:FS01:Upload 12.60%
21:59:26:WU00:FS01:Upload 13.69%
21:59:29:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 340000 out of 2000000 steps (17%)
21:59:32:WU00:FS01:Upload 14.73%
21:59:38:WU00:FS01:Upload 15.73%
21:59:44:WU00:FS01:Upload 16.87%
21:59:50:WU00:FS01:Upload 17.54%
21:59:56:WU00:FS01:Upload 18.11%
22:00:02:WU00:FS01:Upload 18.96%
22:00:08:WU00:FS01:Upload 20.06%
22:00:14:WU00:FS01:Upload 21.15%
22:00:20:WU00:FS01:Upload 22.29%
22:00:26:WU00:FS01:Upload 23.39%
22:00:32:WU00:FS01:Upload 24.43%
22:00:38:WU00:FS01:Upload 25.57%
22:00:44:WU00:FS01:Upload 26.71%
22:00:50:WU00:FS01:Upload 27.81%
22:00:56:WU00:FS01:Upload 28.85%
22:01:02:WU00:FS01:Upload 29.85%
22:01:08:WU00:FS01:Upload 30.90%
22:01:14:WU00:FS01:Upload 31.99%
22:01:20:WU00:FS01:Upload 33.08%
22:01:26:WU00:FS01:Upload 34.17%
22:01:30:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 360000 out of 2000000 steps (18%)
22:01:32:WU00:FS01:Upload 35.32%
22:01:38:WU00:FS01:Upload 36.41%
22:01:44:WU00:FS01:Upload 37.41%
22:01:50:WU00:FS01:Upload 38.41%
22:01:56:WU00:FS01:Upload 39.45%
22:02:02:WU00:FS01:Upload 40.59%
22:02:08:WU00:FS01:Upload 41.68%
22:02:14:WU00:FS01:Upload 42.78%
22:02:20:WU00:FS01:Upload 43.92%
22:02:26:WU00:FS01:Upload 45.01%
22:02:32:WU00:FS01:Upload 46.11%
22:02:38:WU00:FS01:Upload 47.25%
22:02:44:WU00:FS01:Upload 48.34%
22:02:54:WU00:FS01:Upload 49.38%
22:03:00:WU00:FS01:Upload 50.38%
22:03:06:WU00:FS01:Upload 51.52%
22:03:12:WU00:FS01:Upload 52.66%
22:03:18:WU00:FS01:Upload 53.81%
22:03:24:WU00:FS01:Upload 54.52%
22:03:26:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 380000 out of 2000000 steps (19%)
22:03:30:WU00:FS01:Upload 55.52%
22:03:36:WU00:FS01:Upload 56.18%
22:03:42:WU00:FS01:Upload 56.94%
22:03:48:WU00:FS01:Upload 57.94%
22:03:54:WU00:FS01:Upload 58.70%
22:04:00:WU00:FS01:Upload 59.41%
22:04:07:WU00:FS01:Upload 60.22%
22:04:13:WU00:FS01:Upload 61.31%
22:04:19:WU00:FS01:Upload 62.50%
22:04:25:WU00:FS01:Upload 63.60%
22:04:31:WU00:FS01:Upload 64.74%
22:04:37:WU00:FS01:Upload 65.83%
22:04:43:WU00:FS01:Upload 66.97%
22:04:50:WU00:FS01:Upload 67.68%
22:04:57:WU00:FS01:Upload 68.06%
22:05:03:WU00:FS01:Upload 68.78%
22:05:09:WU00:FS01:Upload 69.63%
22:05:15:WU00:FS01:Upload 70.73%
22:05:21:WU00:FS01:Upload 71.87%
22:05:22:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 400000 out of 2000000 steps (20%)
22:05:27:WU00:FS01:Upload 72.91%
22:05:33:WU00:FS01:Upload 74.05%
22:05:39:WU00:FS01:Upload 75.19%
22:05:45:WU00:FS01:Upload 76.29%
22:05:51:WU00:FS01:Upload 77.38%
22:05:57:WU00:FS01:Upload 78.52%
22:06:03:WU00:FS01:Upload 79.66%
22:06:09:WU00:FS01:Upload 80.80%
22:06:15:WU00:FS01:Upload 81.94%
22:06:21:WU00:FS01:Upload 82.99%
22:06:27:WU00:FS01:Upload 84.08%
22:06:33:WU00:FS01:Upload 85.18%
22:06:39:WU00:FS01:Upload 86.27%
22:06:45:WU00:FS01:Upload 87.31%
22:06:51:WU00:FS01:Upload 88.46%
22:06:57:WU00:FS01:Upload 89.55%
22:07:03:WU00:FS01:Upload 90.64%
22:07:09:WU00:FS01:Upload 91.78%
22:07:15:WU00:FS01:Upload 92.88%
22:07:19:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 420000 out of 2000000 steps (21%)
22:07:21:WU00:FS01:Upload 94.02%
22:07:27:WU00:FS01:Upload 95.11%
22:07:33:WU00:FS01:Upload 96.25%
22:07:39:WU00:FS01:Upload 97.39%
22:07:45:WU00:FS01:Upload 98.53%
22:07:51:WU00:FS01:Upload 99.67%
22:08:02:WU00:FS01:Upload 99.91%
22:08:04:WU00:FS01:Upload complete
22:08:04:WU00:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
22:08:04:WU00:FS01:Cleaning up
22:09:14:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 440000 out of 2000000 steps (22%)
22:11:07:FS01:Finishing
22:11:11:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 460000 out of 2000000 steps (23%)
22:13:10:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 480000 out of 2000000 steps (24%)
22:15:09:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 500000 out of 2000000 steps (25%)
22:17:10:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 520000 out of 2000000 steps (26%)
22:19:09:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 540000 out of 2000000 steps (27%)
22:21:10:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 560000 out of 2000000 steps (28%)
22:23:08:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 580000 out of 2000000 steps (29%)
22:25:07:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 600000 out of 2000000 steps (30%)
22:27:08:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 620000 out of 2000000 steps (31%)
22:29:06:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 640000 out of 2000000 steps (32%)
22:31:03:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 660000 out of 2000000 steps (33%)
22:32:58:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 680000 out of 2000000 steps (34%)
22:34:53:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 700000 out of 2000000 steps (35%)
22:36:51:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 720000 out of 2000000 steps (36%)
22:38:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 740000 out of 2000000 steps (37%)
22:40:43:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 760000 out of 2000000 steps (38%)
22:42:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 780000 out of 2000000 steps (39%)
22:44:34:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 800000 out of 2000000 steps (40%)
22:46:30:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 820000 out of 2000000 steps (41%)
22:48:26:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 840000 out of 2000000 steps (42%)
22:50:22:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 860000 out of 2000000 steps (43%)
22:52:18:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 880000 out of 2000000 steps (44%)
22:54:13:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 900000 out of 2000000 steps (45%)
22:56:10:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 920000 out of 2000000 steps (46%)
22:57:58:433:127.0.0.1:New Web connection
22:58:05:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 940000 out of 2000000 steps (47%)
23:00:04:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 960000 out of 2000000 steps (48%)
23:02:00:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 980000 out of 2000000 steps (49%)
23:03:55:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1000000 out of 2000000 steps (50%)
23:05:52:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1020000 out of 2000000 steps (51%)
23:07:51:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1040000 out of 2000000 steps (52%)
23:09:49:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1060000 out of 2000000 steps (53%)
23:11:45:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1080000 out of 2000000 steps (54%)
23:13:41:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1100000 out of 2000000 steps (55%)
23:15:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1120000 out of 2000000 steps (56%)
23:17:35:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1140000 out of 2000000 steps (57%)
23:19:32:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1160000 out of 2000000 steps (58%)
23:21:27:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1180000 out of 2000000 steps (59%)
23:23:22:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1200000 out of 2000000 steps (60%)
23:25:19:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1220000 out of 2000000 steps (61%)
23:27:14:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1240000 out of 2000000 steps (62%)
23:29:11:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1260000 out of 2000000 steps (63%)
23:31:07:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1280000 out of 2000000 steps (64%)
23:33:03:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1300000 out of 2000000 steps (65%)
23:35:00:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1320000 out of 2000000 steps (66%)
23:36:55:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1340000 out of 2000000 steps (67%)
23:38:52:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1360000 out of 2000000 steps (68%)
23:40:50:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1380000 out of 2000000 steps (69%)
23:42:47:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1400000 out of 2000000 steps (70%)
23:44:47:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1420000 out of 2000000 steps (71%)
23:46:44:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1440000 out of 2000000 steps (72%)
23:48:48:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1460000 out of 2000000 steps (73%)
23:50:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1480000 out of 2000000 steps (74%)
23:52:43:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1500000 out of 2000000 steps (75%)
23:54:41:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1520000 out of 2000000 steps (76%)
23:56:45:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1540000 out of 2000000 steps (77%)
23:58:47:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1560000 out of 2000000 steps (78%)
00:00:48:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1580000 out of 2000000 steps (79%)
00:02:51:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1600000 out of 2000000 steps (80%)
00:04:51:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1620000 out of 2000000 steps (81%)
00:06:49:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1640000 out of 2000000 steps (82%)
00:08:49:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1660000 out of 2000000 steps (83%)
00:10:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1680000 out of 2000000 steps (84%)
00:12:43:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1700000 out of 2000000 steps (85%)
00:14:42:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1720000 out of 2000000 steps (86%)
00:16:38:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1740000 out of 2000000 steps (87%)
00:18:35:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1760000 out of 2000000 steps (88%)
00:20:31:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1780000 out of 2000000 steps (89%)
00:22:26:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1800000 out of 2000000 steps (90%)
00:24:23:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1820000 out of 2000000 steps (91%)
00:26:18:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1840000 out of 2000000 steps (92%)
00:28:15:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1860000 out of 2000000 steps (93%)
00:30:10:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1880000 out of 2000000 steps (94%)
00:32:06:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1900000 out of 2000000 steps (95%)
00:34:04:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1920000 out of 2000000 steps (96%)
00:35:59:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1940000 out of 2000000 steps (97%)
00:37:56:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1960000 out of 2000000 steps (98%)
00:39:51:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 1980000 out of 2000000 steps (99%)
00:41:46:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 2000000 out of 2000000 steps (100%)
00:41:48:WU01:FS01:0x22:Saving result file ..\logfile_01.txt
00:41:48:WU01:FS01:0x22:Saving result file checkpointState.xml
00:41:48:WU01:FS01:0x22:Saving result file checkpt.crc
00:41:48:WU01:FS01:0x22:Saving result file positions.xtc
00:41:48:WU01:FS01:0x22:Saving result file science.log
00:41:48:WU01:FS01:0x22:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
00:41:48:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
00:41:48:WU01:FS01:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:11761 run:0 clone:10839 gen:22 core:0x22 unit:0x0000002b80fccb0a5e70ef0a2756be4a
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by PantherX »

Please note that the section which has the system configuration and client configuration is missing. You may need to refresh FAHControl to get that information. Here's what mine looks like (the pattern would be same on your system too):

Code: Select all

*********************** Log Started 2020-04-12T05:12:05Z ***********************
05:12:05:************************* Folding@home Client *************************
05:12:05:        Website: https://foldingathome.org/
05:12:05:      Copyright: (c) 2009-2018 foldingathome.org
05:12:05:         Author: Joseph Coffland <joseph@cauldrondevelopment.com>
05:12:05:           Args: 
05:12:05:         Config: C:\Users\PantherX-H\AppData\Roaming\FAHClient\config.xml
05:12:05:******************************** Build ********************************
05:12:05:        Version: 7.5.1
05:12:05:           Date: May 11 2018
05:12:05:           Time: 13:06:32
05:12:05:     Repository: Git
05:12:05:       Revision: 4705bf53c635f88b8fe85af7675557e15d491ff0
05:12:05:         Branch: master
05:12:05:       Compiler: Visual C++ 2008
05:12:05:        Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /wd4297 /wd4103 /Ox /MT
05:12:05:       Platform: win32 10
05:12:05:           Bits: 32
05:12:05:           Mode: Release
05:12:05:******************************* System ********************************
05:12:05:            CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz
05:12:05:         CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 94 Stepping 3
05:12:05:           CPUs: 8
05:12:05:         Memory: 31.94GiB
05:12:05:    Free Memory: 27.81GiB
05:12:05:        Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
05:12:05:     OS Version: 6.2
05:12:05:    Has Battery: false
05:12:05:     On Battery: false
05:12:05:     UTC Offset: 12
05:12:05:            PID: 8584
05:12:05:            CWD: C:\Users\PantherX-H\AppData\Roaming\FAHClient
05:12:05:             OS: Windows 10 Enterprise
05:12:05:        OS Arch: AMD64
05:12:05:           GPUs: 1
05:12:05:          GPU 0: Bus:1 Slot:0 Func:0 NVIDIA:8 GP102 [GeForce GTX 1080 Ti] 11380
05:12:05:  CUDA Device 0: Platform:0 Device:0 Bus:1 Slot:0 Compute:6.1 Driver:10.2
05:12:05:OpenCL Device 0: Platform:0 Device:0 Bus:1 Slot:0 Compute:1.2 Driver:442.19
05:12:05:  Win32 Service: false
05:12:05:***********************************************************************
05:12:05:<config>
05:12:05:  <!-- Network -->
05:12:05:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
05:12:05:
05:12:05:  <!-- Slot Control -->
05:12:05:  <power v='full'/>
05:12:05:
05:12:05:  <!-- User Information -->
05:12:05:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
05:12:05:  <team v='69411'/>
05:12:05:  <user v='PantherX'/>
05:12:05:
05:12:05:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
05:12:05:  <slot id='1' type='GPU'>
05:12:05:    <next-unit-percentage v='100'/>
05:12:05:    <pause-on-start v='true'/>
05:12:05:  </slot>
05:12:05:</config>
05:12:05:Trying to access database...
05:12:05:Successfully acquired database lock
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Doctrinaire
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:28 am
Hardware configuration: Windows 10 x64-bit
F@H client: V7.5.1

Intel i5-7600k
AMD MSI RX 480 Gaming X 8gb
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by Doctrinaire »

hmm how exactly would I refresh FAH control? Close the process and reopen it?
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by bruce »

I would also verify that you've enteren the same passkey in each of your machines. As you probably know, the first 10 WUs for each UserName/Passkey pair do not receive a bonus. According to the records I can see, you've got three physical machines. The third column below indicates 0 (no bonus) or 1 (bonus awarded)

D3 AMD 0 11778 0 7596 11

CB x86 1 14303 7 531 7
CC AMD 1 11778 0 18706 7

AC x86 0 14623 1681 4 5
AD AMD 0 11761 0 10839 22

If you display the log in FAHControl, the passkey is censored, but if you find the config.xml on disk, you can check it for errors.
Doctrinaire
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:28 am
Hardware configuration: Windows 10 x64-bit
F@H client: V7.5.1

Intel i5-7600k
AMD MSI RX 480 Gaming X 8gb
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by Doctrinaire »

Not sure how you see 3 machines. I've only got 1. I have uninstalled and reinstalled F@H control 2 or 3 times because it got hung up on 'Connecting' and wouldn't do anything.

Eventually on one of the reinstalls, it reconnected to the server. I reentered my username, passkey, and folding team, and it's been working. Just seems to only give base points
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by PantherX »

Each re-install would create a new UserID

There's a button on FAHControl in the lower right corner called "Refresh" and if you do that, ensure that you untick "Follow" so you can scroll to the top to get your log file.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by bruce »

The WUs are in chronological order, so Machine AC/AD is the active one. The last 4 numbers are the last WU returned by each slot as of when I looked at it.
Doctrinaire
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:28 am
Hardware configuration: Windows 10 x64-bit
F@H client: V7.5.1

Intel i5-7600k
AMD MSI RX 480 Gaming X 8gb
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by Doctrinaire »

Ah alright got ya Bruce.

Ok that makes since now, I kinda thought after I sent my last message that maybe each install would be a different user. So I wonder if the issue is if my passkey is applied to a previous install/userID.

I'll have to give the refresh a try later today when I get on my PC.

Thanks for the assistance PantherX, I'll update later.
Doctrinaire
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:28 am
Hardware configuration: Windows 10 x64-bit
F@H client: V7.5.1

Intel i5-7600k
AMD MSI RX 480 Gaming X 8gb
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by Doctrinaire »

I found the refresh, it loaded my full log file when viewed in F@H control so i can see the top of it. I'm starting a new search for another GPU WU. I'll keep an eye on the log and see if it lists system and client config before starting. Looking through the log file it seems not all WUs are listing my config info at all, and just starting the folding.

Not sure what happened but my last WU gave me a bonus. It did show the config, but not until 34% of the assignment had been completed. So i'm not sure what is going on with the WUs that dont list config. Guess those aren't getting bonus, and are the ones that i get base points from.


https://apps.foldingathome.org/cpu
Doctrinaire
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:28 am
Hardware configuration: Windows 10 x64-bit
F@H client: V7.5.1

Intel i5-7600k
AMD MSI RX 480 Gaming X 8gb
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by Doctrinaire »

I did have an issue with some WUs erroring out, but figured my GPU's overclock was causing problems. My RX480's base clock is 1303, and i've found 1385 to be about the limit on stability. So i backed it off to near base clock. Beyond that it starts to show signs that the core is being pushed ever so slightly too far and artifacts show up. Been running on the card at 1385 since last summer, if not longer, but from what i read in forums F@H can be more sensitive to OC.
Neil-B
Posts: 1996
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by Neil-B »

FAH will work your GPU far harder than just about anything else (including stress testing programs) - In a way that is what it is meant to do as it is a compute intensive task that has been optimised to get the most out of GPUs - and because of this any instability in a GPU is likely to become obvious where in other circumstances it might not so you might say that your GPU is sensitive to "FAH like" loads ;) ... It is not really the FAH software at fault, and not really the GPU either - it has been adjusted to be stable under less intensive loads ... It is simply one of those things where a balance needs to be found - which by the sounds of it you have done which is great :)

A car engine can be tuned to give great performance on a non oval sprint race track where the engine revs continually go up and down all around the laps for an hour or so ... run the same engine (without retuning it) on a high speed oval for twelve hours and it may well have issues running "hot" as it is simply not been tuned for extended high rev running ... even the daily commute compact can be tuned up to run twelve hour races - it may take a bit more work and no be quite as fast, but it can probably do it !!

Not making excuses for FAH software or blaming you GPU, just trying to show how something that works well (even perfectly) under one set of parameters can be less than optimal under others ... Really glad you have found and adjustment that works :)
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
Doctrinaire
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:28 am
Hardware configuration: Windows 10 x64-bit
F@H client: V7.5.1

Intel i5-7600k
AMD MSI RX 480 Gaming X 8gb
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by Doctrinaire »

@Neil-B

Make perfect since. A litttle similar to when i first OCed my card, course not exactly as comparing F@H to benchmark software. Running closer to 1400+ mhz, as apposed to 1385 that i settled on, in 3D Mark it did show artifacts/issues. But did in Unigine Heaven Benchmark i got no issue. Just a variance in the benchmark programs that tested the card a bit more than the other. Good thing i tested more than 1, because i was going to settle for higher speed in Heaven testing but ran 3Dmark as a double check.


I could put in the effort to try and find F@H's OC limit, although that is not as cut and dry as normal gpu oc testing. Much harder to find that sweet spot when i have no way of determining if it's stable until it isn's.
Neil-B
Posts: 1996
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: GPU WUs giving base points?

Post by Neil-B »

You should find that if you ask there will be many of the GPU folding community who will be willing to share their experiences and help you find the best approach to suit yourself ... I am but a simple CPU folder and as such my choices are less intricate (or that is what I let myself believe) ... Fold On :)
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
Post Reply