50% GPU Utilization
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: 50% GPU Utilization
Under the Sensors tab, look at GPU Load. Mine hovers between 98% and 100% on average while folding.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Re: 50% GPU Utilization
I generally look at two sensors. GPULoad and PerfCapReasonr0k0 wrote:i have gpu-z but in the sensor tab, what do i look for ?
You do have to consider the size of the protein being folded, however. For large proteins, performance is limited by the number of shaders. For small proteins, GPULoad will be limited by the Memory Controller Load and possibly by the Bus Interface Load. You can't make use of a large number of shaders if you can't get the data fast enough to keep them all busy.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 5:01 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i7 6850K - MSI Tomahawk - 32GB DDR4-3000 - Asus ROG 5700XT
Intel 2x Xeon X5675 - HP Board - 48GB DDR3-1333 ECC - nVIDIA Quadro K4000 - Location: Gatineau, QC
Re: 50% GPU Utilization
ahhh haha thanks guys
Main - Intel 10700K / Asus Z490-E / 32GBGB DDR4-3200 / 2080Ti
Folding - HP Z220 Xeon E3 1245 V2 / 16GB DDR3-1600 / GTX 1060 6GB
Folding - HP Z420 Xeon E5 2650 / 16GB DDR3-1600 ECC / GTX 1070Ti
Folding - HP Z800 2X Xeon X5675 / 48GB DDR3-1333 ECC / RX480
Folding - HP Z220 Xeon E3 1245 V2 / 16GB DDR3-1600 / GTX 1060 6GB
Folding - HP Z420 Xeon E5 2650 / 16GB DDR3-1600 ECC / GTX 1070Ti
Folding - HP Z800 2X Xeon X5675 / 48GB DDR3-1333 ECC / RX480
Re: 50% GPU Utilization
GPU load is the one to look at.
Re: 50% GPU Utilization
I am new at this, but I was wondering how do you tell the size of the protein? I have been trying to figure out the very erratic PPD numbers I get from my 4 identical 2080 Supers. I know this plays some part in it, but I think there is more going on than just that. I have two Identical machines with 2 2080's each all 4 the exact same card as well. My PPD can go from 2.9M est to 999k EST on any given WU, all while GPU Z tells me that 1 card in each machine never sees above a 68-69% workload on the GPU. The other is at 90-98%. It's driving me batty trying to figure it out. I have tried different drivers, I even swapped motherboards (brands as well) just to see. The lower Estimated PPD WU always coincided with the low utilization card as well.bruce wrote:I generally look at two sensors. GPULoad and PerfCapReasonr0k0 wrote:i have gpu-z but in the sensor tab, what do i look for ?
You do have to consider the size of the protein being folded, however. For large proteins, performance is limited by the number of shaders. For small proteins, GPULoad will be limited by the Memory Controller Load and possibly by the Bus Interface Load. You can't make use of a large number of shaders if you can't get the data fast enough to keep them all busy.
Any ideas?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7936
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2 - Location: W. MA
Re: 50% GPU Utilization
The size of the simulation is the number of atoms is listed in the Project Summary - https://apps.foldingathome.org/psummary - for every project. Currently that ranges from under 10,000 to over 400,000. That is not directly the "size of the protein as it includes the solvent around the protein, but is useful in a relative manner.saustin wrote:I am new at this, but I was wondering how do you tell the size of the protein?
iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3