Problems at WU termination

If you're new to FAH and need help getting started or you have very basic questions, start here.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Faissal
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 12:28 pm

Problems at WU termination

Post by Faissal »

When I check my completed WU's at https://apps.foldingathome.org/cpu , it only indicates the very first WU I finished, and the two I did after that one do not appear.

When I check the log file, for each WU, this is what I find:

1/ This one has completed seveal days ago, but is not credited on my account

Code: Select all

19:44:31:WU00:FS00:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:14328 run:1 clone:641 gen:24 unit:0x0000001a9bf7a4d65e6d13b7803e19c4
[…]
19:45:04:WU00:FS00:Upload complete
19:45:04:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
19:45:04:WU00:FS00:Final credit estimate, 485.00 points
19:45:04:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up
2/ this one is credited properly, it seems

Code: Select all

19:19:41:WU02:FS00:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
19:19:41:WU02:FS00:Sending unit results: id:02 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:14308 run:2 clone:29 gen:51 core:0xa7 unit:0x000000369bf7a4d55e655ebdf462ec63
19:19:41:WU02:FS00:Uploading 3.24MiB to 155.247.164.213
19:19:41:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 155.247.164.213:8080
19:19:45:WU02:FS00:Upload complete
19:19:45:WU02:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
19:19:45:WU02:FS00:Final credit estimate, 373.00 points
19:19:45:WU02:FS00:Cleaning up

Here the WU has completed but it seems it all crashed.I don't even get the WORK_ACK line, it looks like I ran the machine for several days for nothing

Code: Select all

08:45:49:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Saving result file ..\logfile_01.txt
08:45:49:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Saving result file frame1.edr
08:45:49:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Saving result file frame1.trr
08:45:49:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Saving result file frame1.xtc
08:45:49:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Saving result file md.log
08:45:49:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Saving result file science.log
08:45:49:WU00:FS00:0xa7:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
08:45:50:WU00:FS00:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
08:45:50:WU00:FS00:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:13850 run:0 clone:29638 gen:1 core:0xa7 unit:0x00000003287234c95e788ece706c5a29
08:45:50:WU00:FS00:Uploading 2.73MiB to 40.114.52.201
08:45:50:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 40.114.52.201:8080
[...]
08:46:11:WARNING:WU00:FS00:WorkServer connection failed on port 8080 trying 80
08:46:11:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 40.114.52.201:80
08:46:23:ERROR:Receive error: 10053: An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine.
08:46:32:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Exception: Failed to send results to work server: Failed to connect to 40.114.52.201:80: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.
08:46:32:WU00:FS00:Trying to send results to collection server
08:46:33:WU00:FS00:Uploading 2.73MiB to 128.252.203.2
08:46:33:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 128.252.203.2:8080
08:46:35:WU00:FS00:Upload complete
08:46:35:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_QUIT (404)
08:46:35:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping
08:46:35:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up
Jorgeminator
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:24 am
Location: Finland

Re: Problems at WU termination

Post by Jorgeminator »

Is your CPU overclocked? The third WU was likely corrupt and therefore dumped.
Image
Faissal
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 12:28 pm

Re: Problems at WU termination

Post by Faissal »

Hi Jorgeminator,

No I haven't overclocked the CPU. For the thirs task at some point, to speed the work, I went to FAHControl, and instead of choosing -1 for CPU, I put it to 4. Is it what you call overclocking? I didn't change anything in the laptop itself, only (temporarily) in FAHControl, because today I need my laptop for work so wouldn't be able to do any folding, so wanted to complete the WU before that.

Any idea of what could have happened?
When I connect to my workplace, I usually must activate the company VPN, could it be the cause of the problem?
Also any idea why only one out of the two other WU are counted in the stats?
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 8002
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Studio M1 Max 32 GB smp6
Mac Hack i7-7700K 48 GB smp4
Location: W. MA

Re: Problems at WU termination

Post by Joe_H »

Several possibilities. First is if one of the files that gets packed up with the WU results to be sent in was corrupted, possibly by an antivirus scan modifying it. That has been seen in the past, random data in the file happens to match a signature on a scan.

Another is a network transmission error between your system and the server.

Finally is a bad setting on the CS or WS that causes the WU to be rejected. This is harder to track down, we do watch for patterns of specific servers rejecting WUs from specific projects and request the persons running those projects to check when we see this happen.

Setting the CPU thread count to a different value should not cause a problem. Overclocking refers to the practice of some enthusiasts to increase the clock speed of their CPU or GPU to above standard. For example, a CPU is rated to run at 3 GHz, they may overclock it with extra cooling to run at 3.5 GHz.
Image
Faissal
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 12:28 pm

Re: Problems at WU termination

Post by Faissal »

Oh I see...That would give a reason of why the job 3/ gets wrong.


Any idea why the job 1/ does not appears in my stat? That one seems to have completed properly, and it's almost a week now.
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 8002
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Studio M1 Max 32 GB smp6
Mac Hack i7-7700K 48 GB smp4
Location: W. MA

Re: Problems at WU termination

Post by Joe_H »

Checking on the first one does show it recored in the database:
Hi Faissal (team 0), Your WU (P14328 R1 C641 G24) was added to the stats database on Invalid Date for 370 points of credit.
That may be base credit, I did not look up the project.
Image
Post Reply