Expected PPD and Current Setup?
Moderator: Site Moderators
Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
Response from Microsoft. Since the sending domain is not inside your tenant you will need to work with the senders Admin and ask them to do a message trace and see if the message is leaving the @foldingathome.org environment. You should also ask if there is a delivery failure that they can reference. We need to see if it is leaving their environment and being rejected by our servers.
So who is in charge of this part of the program so I can talk/work with them?
So who is in charge of this part of the program so I can talk/work with them?
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
While I'm waiting for the contact information I took a look at what I can see about your current setup and see the following.
Currently the SPF record for foldingathome.org is
v=spf1 a include:_spf.google.com ~all
The a in the spf says to use the host in the domains A record but the A record points to 18.224.220.114 and you are sending from 65.254.110.241 (based on the email I had sent to my Gmail address)
You do have a ~all on the end which should generate a SoftFail which should still go through but not always.
At minimum I would suggest you change it to
v=spf1 a ip4:65.254.110.241 include:_spf.google.com ~all
Another method would be to actually use a email user account with credential to send the email. Based on the SPF I would say that it is GMAIL. This way it would come from a google address and be more likely to go through.
Currently the SPF record for foldingathome.org is
v=spf1 a include:_spf.google.com ~all
The a in the spf says to use the host in the domains A record but the A record points to 18.224.220.114 and you are sending from 65.254.110.241 (based on the email I had sent to my Gmail address)
You do have a ~all on the end which should generate a SoftFail which should still go through but not always.
At minimum I would suggest you change it to
v=spf1 a ip4:65.254.110.241 include:_spf.google.com ~all
Another method would be to actually use a email user account with credential to send the email. Based on the SPF I would say that it is GMAIL. This way it would come from a google address and be more likely to go through.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7922
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2 - Location: W. MA
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
We did get an update from the person maintaining the mail server, it might explain part of your issue, some other domains are also having issues getting emails sent. The mail server moved recently, and some of the rDNS settings did not get updated. He was working on getting that done, and getting them propagated out.
Originally the email was being sent from a gmail account, the large numbers of passkey emails sent hit a list set for sending and they stopped actually going out.
Originally the email was being sent from a gmail account, the large numbers of passkey emails sent hit a list set for sending and they stopped actually going out.
iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
Any update on this?
I see some changes but still no reply to the two accounts I tried today. (One corporate and on University both using 365).
Here is what Microsoft is asking.
We are looking to see if there is a delivery failure that is being generated on their side. Also if they could provide a message trace showing that it is being rejected by our servers that will help us.
Can you advise which third party application is being used? Is it WordPress? Are they using Contact Form 7?
I see some changes but still no reply to the two accounts I tried today. (One corporate and on University both using 365).
Here is what Microsoft is asking.
We are looking to see if there is a delivery failure that is being generated on their side. Also if they could provide a message trace showing that it is being rejected by our servers that will help us.
Can you advise which third party application is being used? Is it WordPress? Are they using Contact Form 7?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7922
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2 - Location: W. MA
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
I do know an update to the SPF record was made recently, Wednesday evening. Can you try now and see if an email comes through? If not, I can bring this topic to the attention of the person managing the passkey mailer.
iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
Still nothing.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7922
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2 - Location: W. MA
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
Okay, I have sent a note to the person handling the passkey mailer to see if he can take a look.
iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:42 pm
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
- Contact:
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
This is an example of the error I'm seeing many many times in our postfix mail logs:
Note, these emails are being generated by our system from the passkey request form on our Website. See https://apps.foldingathome.org/getpasskey So they are begin requested by the owner of the email. We are not sending any other emails. We've just had a massive increase in the number of passkey requests.
Code: Select all
Mar 28 23:58:07 foldingathome postfix/smtp[23424]: E03FA8155F: to=<redacted>, relay=cloud3d-ltd.mail.protection.outlook.com[104.47.4.36]:25, delay=1.5, delays=0.05/0/1.1/0.28, dsn=5.7.606, status=bounced (host cloud3d-ltd.mail.protection.outlook.com[104.47.4.36] said: 550 5.7.606 Access denied, banned sending IP [65.254.110.241]. To request removal from this list please visit https://sender.office.com/ and follow the directions. For more information please go to http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=526655 AS(1430) [AM5EUR02FT045.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com] (in reply to RCPT TO command))
Cauldron Development LLC
http://cauldrondevelopment.com/
http://cauldrondevelopment.com/
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2020 12:07 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i9 9900KF @4.9GHZ
MSI Z390M Gaming OC
64GB G-Skill Ripjaw 3200
Gigabyte RTX2060 Super Gaming OC
NZXT Kraken X63 AIO
Corsair RM850
Samsung 1TB Evo Pro NVMe - Location: Qatar
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
Has someone requested removal of the block?jcoffland wrote:This is an example of the error I'm seeing many many times in our postfix mail logs:
Note, these emails are being generated by our system from the passkey request form on our Website. See https://apps.foldingathome.org/getpasskey So they are begin requested by the owner of the email. We are not sending any other emails. We've just had a massive increase in the number of passkey requests.Code: Select all
Mar 28 23:58:07 foldingathome postfix/smtp[23424]: E03FA8155F: to=<redacted>, relay=cloud3d-ltd.mail.protection.outlook.com[104.47.4.36]:25, delay=1.5, delays=0.05/0/1.1/0.28, dsn=5.7.606, status=bounced (host cloud3d-ltd.mail.protection.outlook.com[104.47.4.36] said: 550 5.7.606 Access denied, banned sending IP [65.254.110.241]. To request removal from this list please visit https://sender.office.com/ and follow the directions. For more information please go to http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=526655 AS(1430) [AM5EUR02FT045.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com] (in reply to RCPT TO command))
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
Thanks for the update. It is being looked into. I will update when I have more info.
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
Response.
Unfortunately I can not tell if someone from the organization has requested the removal of the block, however this is something that they can easily do. For your reference I am providing you an article that will guide you through the process.
• https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/micros ... -worldwide
Unfortunately I can not tell if someone from the organization has requested the removal of the block, however this is something that they can easily do. For your reference I am providing you an article that will guide you through the process.
• https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/micros ... -worldwide
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
Has someone with access to that address completed the request yet? and if so can you send me the latest message received.
Re: Expected PPD and Current Setup?
After no update or response from F@H I will close the Microsoft ticket.